http://news.yahoo.com/s/dailycaller/201 … RlbnRvYmE-
At least he isn't beating around the bush, and is telling us what he "meant" .
At least he isn't beating around the bush, and is telling us what he "meant" .
Last edited by Blue Herring (2011-05-26 17:03:02)
Ahhhh, so this is the first time you have heard accusations of racism regarding anything and everything Obama does in the negative? Where ya been Macbeth...Macbeth wrote:
A single representative (out of the 535 Congressmen we have) claims most of the backlash against Obama is racist. There just happens to be a single black person in congress who happens to feel that Obama hasn't been given a fair shot because of the color of skin and only you had the foresight to predict this.
Threads like these really don't help people not think you are at least a little racist dude. Honestly I don't see where this thread can possibility go.
and Iam saying this person is a govt official not some shuck off the street. It matters. Oh and it has been more than 1 person over the past coupla years.Macbeth wrote:
No of course not. I'm saying: it doesn't matter what one person says, it doesn't prove anything one way or another. Honestly I really don't see what you are reaching for with this thread.
It was also agreed upon by everyone that there would be at least some accusations of racism by Obama supporters. This is not surprising to anyone. Not to say they aren't right at least every so often...
"I do not care what people think of me, I simply ask if you are going to throw accusations, at least has something to back them up. and to date, no one has. "
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNFokenPInk
There are 535 people in Congress. This one guy represents less than a fifth of 1% of everyone in Congress. Now throw in retired elected officials, leaders of state governments, etc. and we're around in the low thousands. Within that group you could find Holocaust deniers, moon landing hoaxers, Kennedy conspiracy theorist etc. Even if you manage to get 50 of them to agree with the him you would still have proven nothing.lowing wrote:
and Iam saying this person is a govt official not some shuck off the street. It matters. Oh and it has been more than 1 person over the past coupla years.Macbeth wrote:
No of course not. I'm saying: it doesn't matter what one person says, it doesn't prove anything one way or another. Honestly I really don't see what you are reaching for with this thread.
It was also agreed upon by everyone that there would be at least some accusations of racism by Obama supporters. This is not surprising to anyone. Not to say they aren't right at least every so often...
"I do not care what people think of me, I simply ask if you are going to throw accusations, at least has something to back them up. and to date, no one has. "
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNFokenPInk
Some accusations? SOME?! Accusations of racism is all it has been when speaking of Obama's performance in the negative.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library … onkey3.htm hummmmm, I don't recall racism being an issue when this came out. Care to explain the difference/double standard?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 … 163811.htmCrude historical depictions of African Americans as ape-like may have disappeared from mainstream U.S. culture, but research presented in a new paper by psychologists at Stanford, Pennsylvania State University and the University of California-Berkeley reveals that many Americans subconsciously associate blacks with apes.
In addition, the findings show that society is more likely to condone violence against black criminal suspects as a result of its broader inability to accept African Americans as fully human, according to the researchers.
How you can dismiss this as "just one guy", when since Obama has been elected, everyone and everything that opposed him, from NOT voting for him to Obamacare has been met with accusations of racism, and the fact that, that opposition had anything to do with a difference of opinion or agenda has been largely dismissed. "Just one guy", are you serious?Macbeth wrote:
There are 535 people in Congress. This one guy represents less than a fifth of 1% of everyone in Congress. Now throw in retired elected officials, leaders of state governments, etc. and we're around in the low thousands. Within that group you could find Holocaust deniers, moon landing hoaxers, Kennedy conspiracy theorist etc. Even if you manage to get 50 of them to agree with the him you would still have proven nothing.lowing wrote:
and Iam saying this person is a govt official not some shuck off the street. It matters. Oh and it has been more than 1 person over the past coupla years.Macbeth wrote:
No of course not. I'm saying: it doesn't matter what one person says, it doesn't prove anything one way or another. Honestly I really don't see what you are reaching for with this thread.
It was also agreed upon by everyone that there would be at least some accusations of racism by Obama supporters. This is not surprising to anyone. Not to say they aren't right at least every so often...
"I do not care what people think of me, I simply ask if you are going to throw accusations, at least has something to back them up. and to date, no one has. "
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNFokenPInk
Some accusations? SOME?! Accusations of racism is all it has been when speaking of Obama's performance in the negative.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library … onkey3.htm hummmmm, I don't recall racism being an issue when this came out. Care to explain the difference/double standard?
It's well known that monkey's have been used to dehumanize blacks since the oh 1700's. It's obviously racist.http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 … 163811.htmCrude historical depictions of African Americans as ape-like may have disappeared from mainstream U.S. culture, but research presented in a new paper by psychologists at Stanford, Pennsylvania State University and the University of California-Berkeley reveals that many Americans subconsciously associate blacks with apes.
In addition, the findings show that society is more likely to condone violence against black criminal suspects as a result of its broader inability to accept African Americans as fully human, according to the researchers.
http://images.sciencedaily.com/2008/02/080207163811.jpg
"Some accusations? SOME?! Accusations of racism is all it has been when speaking of Obama's performance in the negative."
It never comes up here except when you bring it up. Soooooo
http://forums.bf2s.com/sphinx.php?q=rac … rch=Submit
Of course I realize I'm wasting my fucking time. So i'll just leave this here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamenta … tion_error
Just close this thread.
Last edited by lowing (2011-05-27 01:27:54)
Well the article you posted was just one guy. So if you would like to post some further evidence feel free.lowing wrote:
How you can dismiss this as "just one guy", when since Obama has been elected, everyone and everything that opposed him, from NOT voting for him to Obamacare has been met with accusations of racism, and the fact that, that opposition had anything to do with a difference of opinion or agenda has been largely dismissed. "Just one guy", are you serious?
I posted this because it is the LATEST example, and the position of an elected official, not because it was the only example. do ou honestly think there is no more "evidence" to be had?Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Well the article you posted was just one guy. So if you would like to post some further evidence feel free.lowing wrote:
How you can dismiss this as "just one guy", when since Obama has been elected, everyone and everything that opposed him, from NOT voting for him to Obamacare has been met with accusations of racism, and the fact that, that opposition had anything to do with a difference of opinion or agenda has been largely dismissed. "Just one guy", are you serious?
Or we can argue on generalisations and hearsay like usual.
Well count me as part of that 85% I guess because I am not sure who you are addressing that to.Kmar wrote:
I'm always amused when someone plays the victim of someone playing the victim.
85% of you wont understand that.
A good point Ty, but isn't there a difference between blaming Bush for the weather, (and yes by and large Bush himslef was accused as being a racist) and opposing Obamacare, for example?Ty wrote:
Some old fart Democrat from South Carolina said something dumb, why is this worth commenting on? We're talking South Carolina Democrats here, where Alvin Greene can win a Senate primary due to sheer stupidity and fairy dust. It isn't exactly beyond belief that a politician like Clyburn would reflect the thick-head argument for Obama.
I mentioned this in another thread but when Bush was in power anyone in opposition to him was dismissed as "Bush-Bashing", which sounded like it was some new popular trend. With Obama it's "racism". It's exactly the same thing but in both cases it is not a majority opinion and both of them are as false as each other. Why dignify people like Clyburn with any attention?
After remembering SOOOO many chimped-out George W. pics, it's difficult for me to take this guy seriously.“When he sees his face being put on a chimpanzee’s body; do you think he didn’t see that?” Clyburn asked. “I suspect they send the same faxes to his office they send to mine.”
Regardless, you began the thread with the opinion of one man. Then you were surprised when people commented that it was the opinion of one man...lowing wrote:
I posted this because it is the LATEST example, and the position of an elected official, not because it was the only example. do ou honestly think there is no more "evidence" to be had?Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Well the article you posted was just one guy. So if you would like to post some further evidence feel free.lowing wrote:
How you can dismiss this as "just one guy", when since Obama has been elected, everyone and everything that opposed him, from NOT voting for him to Obamacare has been met with accusations of racism, and the fact that, that opposition had anything to do with a difference of opinion or agenda has been largely dismissed. "Just one guy", are you serious?
Or we can argue on generalisations and hearsay like usual.
surprised? not hardly, in fact, I anticipated the very dismissals and denials the issue has received since his election .Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Regardless, you began the thread with the opinion of one man. Then you were surprised when people commented that it was the opinion of one man...lowing wrote:
I posted this because it is the LATEST example, and the position of an elected official, not because it was the only example. do ou honestly think there is no more "evidence" to be had?Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Well the article you posted was just one guy. So if you would like to post some further evidence feel free.
Or we can argue on generalisations and hearsay like usual.
Well maybe, but that's probably because Bush generally implimented his policies before people started criticising him about them. With Obama it's happens before he impliments them. People, (supporters,) are asking themselves "well why is this?" and are incorrectly coming to the conclusion that this is because of underlying racism, (which actually speaks more to their racism than anyone else's.)lowing wrote:
A good point Ty, but isn't there a difference between blaming Bush for the weather, (and yes by and large Bush himslef was accused as being a racist) and opposing Obamacare, for example?Ty wrote:
Some old fart Democrat from South Carolina said something dumb, why is this worth commenting on? We're talking South Carolina Democrats here, where Alvin Greene can win a Senate primary due to sheer stupidity and fairy dust. It isn't exactly beyond belief that a politician like Clyburn would reflect the thick-head argument for Obama.
I mentioned this in another thread but when Bush was in power anyone in opposition to him was dismissed as "Bush-Bashing", which sounded like it was some new popular trend. With Obama it's "racism". It's exactly the same thing but in both cases it is not a majority opinion and both of them are as false as each other. Why dignify people like Clyburn with any attention?