unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6825|PNW

Yes, they would, and it would be terrible. It wouldn't solve the problem of insufficient budget, because they [government] would just find more things to spend it on.

Like diamond-studded police cars.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5412|London, England

Reciprocity wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Not openly. It would be political suicide. Too many people still believe in the myth of Reaganomics for them to have any chance of bringing back those tax rates. But, they would if they could. Trust me.
well, when it becomes an obama talking point, you just let me know.
Yeah, because he's open with his agenda
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6634|the dank(super) side of Oregon

JohnG@lt wrote:

Yeah, because he's open with his agenda
Now you sound like ATG.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5412|London, England

Reciprocity wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Yeah, because he's open with his agenda
Now you sound like ATG.
Believe what you want. Believe that they've been completely honest with the American people. If there wasn't a mid-term election coming up and they weren't terrified of losing, believe me, Pelosi would be running buck wild trying to reshape the whole of America in California's image.

When it comes to politicians, always expect the worst. There isn't an honest man or woman among the scum that inhabit Washington.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6825|PNW

And when it comes to plumbers, always expect the worst.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5412|London, England

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

And when it comes to plumbers, always expect the worst.
Yes. Ass crack all out and about. What kind of crap is that?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6634|the dank(super) side of Oregon
I don't believe any of them.  But I also don't doubt that both parties are restrained by political realities.  both sides are always terrified of losing.  That's what keeps us from becoming either a socialist state or a completely unrestrained free market christian theocracy.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5412|London, England

Reciprocity wrote:

I don't believe any of them.  But I also don't doubt that both parties are restrained by political realities.  both sides are always terrified of losing.  That's what keeps us from becoming either a socialist state or a completely unrestrained free market christian theocracy.
Really need to separate the belief that having a free market is somehow associated with a christian theocracy. The two ideas couldn't be more at odds. It's why the Republican Party doesn't make any sense.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|6761|67.222.138.85
This is JohnG@lt missing the point that because both sides are terrified of losing, we will have neither the socialist state the Democrats want or the completely unrestrained free market christian theocracy the Republicans want.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6634|the dank(super) side of Oregon

JohnG@lt wrote:

Really need to separate the belief that having a free market is somehow associated with a christian theocracy.
me? I don't.  It's them.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5412|London, England

Reciprocity wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Really need to separate the belief that having a free market is somehow associated with a christian theocracy.
me? I don't.  It's them.
Marriage of convenience foisted on the country by McCarthy

You know, the biggest mistake Marx ever made was attacking religion. Socialism lines up pretty brilliantly with the core Christian values but they'll forever be at odds because of his one stated conviction. Yay for me
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5639

JohnG@lt wrote:

You know, the biggest mistake Marx ever made was attacking religion. Socialism lines up pretty brilliantly with the core Christian values
Christianity and communism don't fit together at all really. To get them to work together would mean one or the other would have to give up a lot of their beliefs and basis.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6634|the dank(super) side of Oregon

Macbeth wrote:

Christianity and communism don't fit together at all really. To get them to work together would mean one or the other would have to give up a lot of their beliefs and basis.
republicans did what communists weren't willing to do.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5412|London, England

Macbeth wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

You know, the biggest mistake Marx ever made was attacking religion. Socialism lines up pretty brilliantly with the core Christian values
Christianity and communism don't fit together at all really. To get them to work together would mean one or the other would have to give up a lot of their beliefs and basis.
The core of each is personal sacrifice. Love thy neighbor also plays in heavily with both. Sacrificing your worldly ambitions for a better place in the afterlife would've been the perfect vehicle for Marxism.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6160|eXtreme to the maX

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

We aren't committing atrocities and using sheer brutality on the Afghans.
But you are invading and dominating, and there have been multiple atrocities.

Dilbert_X wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

The point is Dilbert is talking hate
Where exactly?

Dilbert_X wrote:

Only an American could misinterpret 'Express outrage' as 'Invade'

Dilbert_X wrote:

Thats the convenient self-serving intellectual dishonesty which lets [America] trade with despots.
Pointing out entrenched hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty isn't 'hate'.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6634|the dank(super) side of Oregon

Dilbert_X wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

We aren't committing atrocities and using sheer brutality on the Afghans.
But you are invading and dominating, and there have been multiple atrocities.
Relatively speaking, it could be much worse.

Last edited by Reciprocity (2010-08-01 21:41:21)

Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6160|eXtreme to the maX

Reciprocity wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:


But you are invading and dominating, and there have been multiple atrocities.
Relatively speaking, it could be much worse.
Relatively speaking the bubonic plague could have been a lot worse, so what?
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5412|London, England

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

This is JohnG@lt missing the point that because both sides are terrified of losing, we will have neither the socialist state the Democrats want or the completely unrestrained free market christian theocracy the Republicans want.
Lol, are you really this mad that my argument didn't line up exactly with what you read in the criticism section of his wikipedia page so you don't know how to counter? Get over yourself. You're not nearly as smart as you think you are. You've got the wisdom and life experience of a fruit fly.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6634|the dank(super) side of Oregon

Dilbert_X wrote:

so what?
it could always be worse.  right now we restrain ourselves to our own detriment, but that's just the cost of waging modern war against insurgents.  and I'm not the biggest fan of this war or any war.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5639

JohnG@lt wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

You know, the biggest mistake Marx ever made was attacking religion. Socialism lines up pretty brilliantly with the core Christian values
Christianity and communism don't fit together at all really. To get them to work together would mean one or the other would have to give up a lot of their beliefs and basis.
The core of each is personal sacrifice. Love thy neighbor also plays in heavily with both. Sacrificing your worldly ambitions for a better place in the afterlife would've been the perfect vehicle for Marxism.
Despite the fact I have work in the morning, I'll write you a very short list of reasons why Christianity wouldn't work with communism.
Sacrificing your worldly ambitions for a better place in the afterlife would've been the perfect vehicle for Marxism.
Christianity and a belief in the afterlife does more to make people care less about this life. The idea that 'I'll get a better deal in the next life' makes people care less about this life and do only what they have to in order to make it into the next life with a good deal. Marxism would require people to care about improving their life in this world because 'this is the only one I'll get'.
Love thy neighbor also plays in heavily with both.
Unless your neighbor is a homosexual, a nonbeliever, a adulterer, etc. Christianity does more to set people apart for arbitrary reasons then bring them together. Furthermore, the idea of a 'chosen people' would not fit with the Marxist goal of 'economic equality'. Following Christian logic, if a person or group of people were Gods favorite then power and money they have over others is okay since 'God wills it'. This logic was the same as as the logic the Euro Kings used who claimed Divine Rights since 'if it's happening God must be cool with it.'

I could keep going but I have to get some medically induced sleep. So if you want me to post more tomorrow, it's up to you.
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|6761|67.222.138.85
To boil Macbeth's post down, you can't sacrifice yourself twice. You can only sacrifice yourself to the state if there is no God in need of your full attention.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6634|the dank(super) side of Oregon
religion is a very pliable utility of control.
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|6761|67.222.138.85

Dilbert_X wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

We aren't committing atrocities and using sheer brutality on the Afghans.
But you are invading and dominating, and there have been multiple atrocities.
And yet we are not even close to bringing the full force of our military might into the engagement, at the cost of (amongst other things) American lives. Making the whole area a glass parking lot is the easy example, but there are a lot more reasonable middle grounds in conventional warfare that we are not at either.

Dilbert_X wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

The point is Dilbert is talking hate
Where exactly?

Dilbert_X wrote:

Only an American could misinterpret 'Express outrage' as 'Invade'

Dilbert_X wrote:

Thats the convenient self-serving intellectual dishonesty which lets [America] trade with despots.
Pointing out entrenched hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty isn't 'hate'.
It's small-minded stereotyping across an entire nation. Not hate my ass.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6634|the dank(super) side of Oregon

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

To boil Macbeth's post down, you can't sacrifice yourself twice. You can only sacrifice yourself to the state if there is no God in need of your full attention.
you can always sacrifice yourself to the state in the name of god.
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|6761|67.222.138.85

JohnG@lt wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

This is JohnG@lt missing the point that because both sides are terrified of losing, we will have neither the socialist state the Democrats want or the completely unrestrained free market christian theocracy the Republicans want.
Lol, are you really this mad that my argument didn't line up exactly with what you read in the criticism section of his wikipedia page so you don't know how to counter? Get over yourself. You're not nearly as smart as you think you are. You've got the wisdom and life experience of a fruit fly.
Your "argument" could have been a copy/paste job out of any piece of material telling early twenty somethings to avoid taking out a loan to buy their first car. It demonstrated no understanding of the time value of money.

You have never read/understood the fiscal policy section of Wikipedia, much less an economics textbook.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard