This may surprise some
"Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan" is "My ultimate Ayn Rand porn".
Politics: More fun with anagrams.
Politics: More fun with anagrams.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
We can't just yet.Frank Reynolds wrote:
for fucks sake can we please get the fuck out of trashcanistan now
The suits in DC are busy with more important things, like an election cycle.
They can't be bothered to remember we're in a war while they're busy shopping for votes.
Besides, if we're not in a'stan, we're in Syria or Iran.
What's your hurry? Change of scenery?
id like to change them into a parking lot for solar panels tbhrdx-fx wrote:
We can't just yet.Frank Reynolds wrote:
for fucks sake can we please get the fuck out of trashcanistan now
The suits in DC are busy with more important things, like an election cycle.
They can't be bothered to remember we're in a war while they're busy shopping for votes.
Besides, if we're not in a'stan, we're in Syria or Iran.
What's your hurry? Change of scenery?
What are you looking at dicknose
For the same amount of money spent (with no appreciable effect) on Afghanistan and Iraq, we could probably have manned colonies on the moon and Mars.Frank Reynolds wrote:
id like to change them into a parking lot for solar panels tbh
There is a big difference between arguing about moral/ethical paradigms and not understanding the practical methods (a phrase not interchangeable with compromise mind you) necessary to effect change in that direction.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
It's not bumping if you reply with something relevant to the subject instead of "ur dumb lol".
MacBeth, Flaming Maniac had common sense but lacked the ability to apply real world variables to the ideals that he touted. There is something to be said about defending and holding on to certain ideals. However, if you cannot understand how to fit your political ideology into the world we live in, you are doing a disservice to yourself and the views you espouse. It's kind of like morals - you have a general guideline, but you have to react differently to different situations, sometimes compromising certain ideologies to deal with unpredictable human tendencies. Of course flaming maniac wouldn't see that, because he saw a compromise of ideology and morals as the attributes of a lesser man - which is stupid.
And hearing someone argue about tax rates when they don't pay taxes is funny too.
However, if you disagree on a fundamental level, arguing about practical implementations is worthless. e.g. arguing about specific healthcare proposals when there is a basic difference of opinion regarding the monetary value of human life is pointless unless you are on the Senate floor.
Consistency is vital - inconsistency renders thoughts worthless. If consistency is a given, solidify your fundamentals and all else follows.
p.s. My name is Flaming_Maniac, please spell it right.
there goes the neighnorhood.
Exactly how closed minded wing nuts are created.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
There is a big difference between arguing about moral/ethical paradigms and not understanding the practical methods (a phrase not interchangeable with compromise mind you) necessary to effect change in that direction.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
It's not bumping if you reply with something relevant to the subject instead of "ur dumb lol".
MacBeth, Flaming Maniac had common sense but lacked the ability to apply real world variables to the ideals that he touted. There is something to be said about defending and holding on to certain ideals. However, if you cannot understand how to fit your political ideology into the world we live in, you are doing a disservice to yourself and the views you espouse. It's kind of like morals - you have a general guideline, but you have to react differently to different situations, sometimes compromising certain ideologies to deal with unpredictable human tendencies. Of course flaming maniac wouldn't see that, because he saw a compromise of ideology and morals as the attributes of a lesser man - which is stupid.
And hearing someone argue about tax rates when they don't pay taxes is funny too.
However, if you disagree on a fundamental level, arguing about practical implementations is worthless. e.g. arguing about specific healthcare proposals when there is a basic difference of opinion regarding the monetary value of human life is pointless unless you are on the Senate floor.
Consistency is vital - inconsistency renders thoughts worthless. If consistency is a given, solidify your fundamentals and all else follows.
p.s. My name is Flaming_Maniac, please spell it right.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Macbeth is going to jizz in his underwear.13urnzz wrote:
there goes the neighnorhood.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
well shit
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
in unrelated news, i disagree with that compass test;
I didn't realise underscores were so important to a username other than when logging in.
whoa he livesFlaming_Maniac wrote:
There is a big difference between arguing about moral/ethical paradigms and not understanding the practical methods (a phrase not interchangeable with compromise mind you) necessary to effect change in that direction.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
It's not bumping if you reply with something relevant to the subject instead of "ur dumb lol".
MacBeth, Flaming Maniac had common sense but lacked the ability to apply real world variables to the ideals that he touted. There is something to be said about defending and holding on to certain ideals. However, if you cannot understand how to fit your political ideology into the world we live in, you are doing a disservice to yourself and the views you espouse. It's kind of like morals - you have a general guideline, but you have to react differently to different situations, sometimes compromising certain ideologies to deal with unpredictable human tendencies. Of course flaming maniac wouldn't see that, because he saw a compromise of ideology and morals as the attributes of a lesser man - which is stupid.
And hearing someone argue about tax rates when they don't pay taxes is funny too.
However, if you disagree on a fundamental level, arguing about practical implementations is worthless. e.g. arguing about specific healthcare proposals when there is a basic difference of opinion regarding the monetary value of human life is pointless unless you are on the Senate floor.
Consistency is vital - inconsistency renders thoughts worthless. If consistency is a given, solidify your fundamentals and all else follows.
p.s. My name is Flaming_Maniac, please spell it right.
i've seen him on eve a fair bit tbf. though i haven't run into him (which is a shame, because then i could shoot him)
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
how's he supposed to run a search if ppl don't spell his username right? lol, i used to name pictures "lowing" so when he would search he would have to look at them . . .Jaekus wrote:
I didn't realise underscores were so important to a username other than when logging in.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
I bet you have fired a gun as many times ad you have been in a street fight.Spark wrote:
i've seen him on eve a fair bit tbf. though i haven't run into him (which is a shame, because then i could shoot him)
Oh, and hi FM.
Hi F_M
I roughly expected that.
do you try to be this dense or is it just a giftMacbeth wrote:
I bet you have fired a gun as many times ad you have been in a street fight.Spark wrote:
i've seen him on eve a fair bit tbf. though i haven't run into him (which is a shame, because then i could shoot him)
Oh, and hi FM.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
MehSpark wrote:
do you try to be this dense or is it just a giftMacbeth wrote:
I bet you have fired a gun as many times ad you have been in a street fight.Spark wrote:
i've seen him on eve a fair bit tbf. though i haven't run into him (which is a shame, because then i could shoot him)
Oh, and hi FM.
I just find it funny a nerdy Asian kid was lecturing people on proper self defense even though he had never had a fight in his life.
- globefish23
- sophisticated slacker
- +334|6541|Graz, Austria
Spark gave a lecture? what?Macbeth wrote:
MehSpark wrote:
do you try to be this dense or is it just a giftMacbeth wrote:
I bet you have fired a gun as many times ad you have been in a street fight.
Oh, and hi FM.
I just find it funny a nerdy Asian kid was lecturing people on proper self defense even though he had never had a fight in his life.
