he recently suffered a menatl breakdown but still had access to weapons and the ability to waltz out of a heavily fortified base...
w t f
w t f
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Give enough people weapons, a ton of stress, and extend the mission over a 10 year period and you're bound to get a few psychotic breaks. This isn't the first incident, and I doubt it will be the last if we stay much longer.
That said, the military still has the death penalty so I hope he swings.
That said, the military still has the death penalty so I hope he swings.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
I'm kinda pissed that a Norwegian still holds the High Score.
m3thod wrote:
he recently suffered a menatl breakdown but still had access to weapons and the ability to waltz out of a heavily fortified base...
w t f
Yea... and Yea... god damn.Jay wrote:
Give enough people weapons, a ton of stress, and extend the mission over a 10 year period and you're bound to get a few psychotic breaks. This isn't the first incident, and I doubt it will be the last if we stay much longer.
That said, the military still has the death penalty so I hope he swings.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Gotta roll eyes at the Taliban expressing outrage at the incident. Why do I get the feeling that their argument is less "You killed our women and children!" and more "You dumbass, you're supposed to torture them first!"
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
I'm kinda glad that nobody has beaten it.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
I'm kinda pissed that a Norwegian still holds the High Score.
Not parrot a meme I saw on the internet for starters.Roc18 wrote:
What Uganda do about it?Jaekus wrote:
Shit posting style.
m3thod wrote:
he recently suffered a menatl breakdown but still had access to weapons and the ability to waltz out of a heavily fortified base...
w t f
I'm a bit of both of these viewpoints. In reality it's impossible to always prevent these things 100% of the time. We just hear about it when the shit hits the fan, not all the other times the shit was prevented from hitting the fan.Jay wrote:
Give enough people weapons, a ton of stress, and extend the mission over a 10 year period and you're bound to get a few psychotic breaks. This isn't the first incident, and I doubt it will be the last if we stay much longer.
That said, the military still has the death penalty so I hope he swings.
All that aside I hope they throw the book at him. What he did was inexcusable.
And is CO, for letting someone who has had a breakdown access to weapons, and for such poor base security he was able to get out unnoticed.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Yeah, spread the blame around. Everyone is a mind reader.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
When I was denied leave for my final week in the Army I walked out anyway and walked back in the following sunday and nobody knew a thing. That was the 2nd largest military base in Europe and I just strolled back in, didn't join the sign in queue and headed straight for my baracks.
The blame lies squarely on the soldier that did it.
The blame lies squarely on the soldier that did it.
Apparently 6 US soldiers were killed by Afghan army soldiers after the Quran burning thing. The military leadership has been delusional for some time now, but this is just becoming insane. How many more "we're sorry it was a mistake"'s can these people take?
If anything it seems that our "pre-withdrawal strategy" aimed at making things better after we leave is doing the exact opposite. Would like to hear what Feos has to say on this one.
If anything it seems that our "pre-withdrawal strategy" aimed at making things better after we leave is doing the exact opposite. Would like to hear what Feos has to say on this one.
Last edited by Spearhead (2012-03-12 12:49:43)
Santorum slams global warming 'hoax'
Santorum wrote:
The dangers of carbon dioxide? Tell that to a plant, how dangerous carbon dioxide is.
And suddenly all the internet news sites are abuzz with how Romney can't win the conservative base.
Morons.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
And suddenly all the internet news sites are abuzz with how Romney can't win the conservative base.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
*MormonsWar Man wrote:
Morons.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
And suddenly all the internet news sites are abuzz with how Romney can't win the conservative base.
Same thing.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
*MormonsWar Man wrote:
Morons.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
And suddenly all the internet news sites are abuzz with how Romney can't win the conservative base.
What's up with the republican attacks on science? Seriously. Tell them that academics provide evidence and proofs against or for anything, and the response is that scientists are liars and liberals with an agenda.
Are they just going through a craxy phase right now, or have they been veering off the cliff for some time resulting in Palin ans Santorum sand they are seen as truly representative of Americans?
i voted for Reagan, and consider myself a fiscal conservative.AussieReaper wrote:
truly representative of Americans?
today's republicans belong to a party that i am not familiar with. they invited in the religious zealots, in hopes of breaking a democratically controlled house.
they co-opted the tea bagger movement, in hopes of breaking a democrat controlled senate.
they have run to the right of starboard, in hopes of recapturing the presidency, and in the process are alienating women - statically a little more than half the voting public.
I just realized that none of the Republican candidates are known by their legal names.
WALL OF TEXT.Ty wrote:
We've always had our fair share of religious nuts here. Just look at how many of the modern religions we've spawned: Mormonism, Scientology, Pentacostals etc. (This is a tradition carried over from Merry Ol' England)AussieReaper wrote:
Same thing.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
*MormonsWar Man wrote:
Morons.
What's up with the republican attacks on science? Seriously. Tell them that academics provide evidence and proofs against or for anything, and the response is that scientists are liars and liberals with an agenda.
Are they just going through a craxy phase right now, or have they been veering off the cliff for some time resulting in Palin ans Santorum sand they are seen as truly representative of Americans?
Aside from the Amish who are anti-science by default, I think the distrust of science begins and ends with evolution. Evolution is an attack on Creationism and since fools like you constantly try to misuse science in your pro-atheism arguments, we've reached the point where the religious distrust all science. Science is now equated with atheism.
As for the attacks on global warming, well, that's just part of the fake dichotomy that Reps and Dems use to try to differentiate themselves. Al Gore is a global warming activist? Then Reps must denounce global warming at every opportunity. This also has the added benefit of helping them land campaign money from oil and energy companies.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
You mean he voluntarily chose the name Newt?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
I just realized that none of the Republican candidates are known by their legal names.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Newton Leroy Gingrich (né McPherson).Jay wrote:
You mean he voluntarily chose the name Newt?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
I just realized that none of the Republican candidates are known by their legal names.
