Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|6239|...
evieira, evolution doesn't stop if the weaker aren't eliminated.

Last edited by dayarath (2011-01-26 09:53:13)

inane little opines
Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|6239|...

JohnG@lt wrote:

tl;dr









Someone had to
let's just hope shifty reads it
inane little opines
Winston_Churchill
Bazinga!
+521|6978|Toronto | Canada

SenorToenails wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

or appendix?  why do we even have it? it has a high likelihood of being infected and cause death and serves little to no purpose.  before modern medicine it was literally a time bomb sitting inside of us, if there was a problem you died.
You'll find this article interesting...  Apparently, it's useful...for a time.
As with most scientific studies, I'd wait for several to confirm that it actually has a significant function.  There are quite a few saying it has little to no use and even more showing that it has an overall negative effect.  Also, an "intelligent designer" wouldnt make something that had a small function for 1% of life and then becomes a serious problem for the rest of life.

EVieira wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

or appendix?  why do we even have it? it has a high likelihood of being infected and cause death and serves little to no purpose.  before modern medicine it was literally a time bomb sitting inside of us, if there was a problem you died.
Because of modern science, which has screwed up the evolutionary process. If people with appendicitis were left to die, like they should, eventually they're genes would leave the gene pool and babies would start being born without and appendix.
And doesnt that support evolution...?  That natural selection acts on the population to remove negative aspects, therefore taking out the whole "not-so-intelligent designer" out of the equation.  And it takes hundreds of thousands of years for something like that to happen, not likely we'd see something that significant happen anytime soon

Last edited by Winston_Churchill (2011-01-26 10:40:52)

Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6861|London, England

dayarath wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

tl;dr









Someone had to
let's just hope shifty reads it
It's less tl;dr and more "I know this shit already" for the vast majority of people on bf2s

Except for Shifty. They teach this shit at school, Shifty isn't being religious by saying stupid things, he's just being a dumbass, and if he never bothered to learn it at school because it conflicts with his own views, then he's an ignorant dumbass.
Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|6239|...

Mekstizzle wrote:

It's less tl;dr and more "I know this shit already" for the vast majority of people on bf2s

Except for Shifty. They teach this shit at school, Shifty isn't being religious by saying stupid things, he's just being a dumbass, and if he never bothered to learn it at school because it conflicts with his own views, then he's an ignorant dumbass.
dunno what they teach in the US, post was meant for him anyway.
inane little opines
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6370|North Tonawanda, NY

JohnG@lt wrote:

SenorToenails wrote:

EVieira wrote:

Because of modern science, which has screwed up the evolutionary process. If people with appendicitis were left to die, like they should, eventually they're genes would leave the gene pool and babies would start being born without and appendix.
Ridiculous.
He's borrowing heavily from the dark side of eugenics but the logic is pretty sound.
It really sounds like this person is linking appendicitis to some genetic cause.  Having an appendix does not guarantee appendicitis, but it is true that one needs to have an appendix to get the condition.  But that brings me to my next point--the incidence of appecidicitis is only 1 in 400.  That's hardly a 'selection force' selecting against having an appendix.

Of course, for this evolutionary stage to occur, there must be a genetic mutation that completely removes the appendix which would also provide a significant boost to survivability for it to become the norm (and with a 1 in 400 incidence rate, and I don't know what the lethality is if untreated, but you can see where I'm going).  I'm not saying it can't happen, but as worded, it's ridiculous.  More likely would be a genetic 'resistance' to inflammation of the appendix.  Less prone to blockage, better immune system, etc... are far more probable than removing an organ structure entirely.  That's assuming appendicitis were some significant selection force.

Edit: I guess I should say I'm thinking on timescales based on how long man has existed so far.

Last edited by SenorToenails (2011-01-26 11:02:39)

Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6821|SE London

Stingray24 wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:


The system determines our destiny in evolution, yes?  We are merely grains of sand in the cosmos etc etc
No. There is no destiny. There is no fate. Mutations occur randomly due to radiation exposure and other causes. They are not predestined to occur. Now, like I said, feel free to chalk those mutations up to the will of your god. At least then you'll be halfway correct instead of wholly wrong.
Ok, so for the sake of argument "destiny" is poor choice of words in the evolutionary cycle.  However, there is an end result not governed by the individual, but by the evolutionary system, yes?
How is a completely random system of pure chance in any way a control system? Randomness is not control, it's the complete opposite.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6840|132 and Bush

Winston_Churchill wrote:

didnt the pope say that the big bang theory happened? only that god was behind it or something...
The big bang was propsed by a catholic priest.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6840|132 and Bush

Uzique wrote:

kmar i know you're pretty into your space shit but this is honestly one of the dumbest fucking threads i have encountered in D&ST

sci-fi chats ---->
Well excuse me for trying to change up the monotonous bush is hitler and obama is a terrorist crap.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6370|North Tonawanda, NY

Kmar wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

didnt the pope say that the big bang theory happened? only that god was behind it or something...
The big bang was propsed by a catholic priest.
I did not know that!

Georges Lemaitre proposed the hypothesis of the primeval atom back in the 1920's.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6392|what

EVieira wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

EVieira wrote:

That's about as hard to prove as the existence of God. Maybe even harder...
I know where I'd place my $
They aren't antagonists. The big bang does not disprove God. Its just that when he said "And let there the light" and hit the switch, there was a really  big bang.
You realise that the Bible states God said let there be light after he had created the Heavens and the Earth?

Why is it Atheists know more about the Bible. ffs
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5418|Sydney

Kmar wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

didnt the pope say that the big bang theory happened? only that god was behind it or something...
The big bang was propsed by a catholic priest.
Yes...
















...proposed to altar boys
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,741|6977|Cinncinatti

AussieReaper wrote:

EVieira wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:


I know where I'd place my $
They aren't antagonists. The big bang does not disprove God. Its just that when he said "And let there the light" and hit the switch, there was a really  big bang.
You realise that the Bible states God said let there be light after he had created the Heavens and the Earth?

Why is it Atheists know more about the Bible. ffs
who cares its just a story
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+796|6924|United States of America

AussieReaper wrote:

EVieira wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:


I know where I'd place my $
They aren't antagonists. The big bang does not disprove God. Its just that when he said "And let there the light" and hit the switch, there was a really  big bang.
You realise that the Bible states God said let there be light after he had created the Heavens and the Earth?

Why is it Atheists know more about the Bible. ffs
That just means we can explain the "flaws" because God did it in the dark.
-Sh1fty-
plundering yee booty
+510|5713|Ventura, California

AussieReaper wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

I still haven't seen anything in the Bible, other than the concept of God, "Proven" false. Everything just connects! There are so many explanations for the reason the Earth is the way it is now in the Bible.
If God created the world for humans, why is it that of all the water on Earth, 70% is salt water?
If you would study the book of Genesis you might figure that out. Man fked that up, not God. If you'll look into it you'll also find out why man could live so long, why there's several continents instead of a Pangaea, and just generally why Earth is the way it is.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6392|what

-Sh1fty- wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

I still haven't seen anything in the Bible, other than the concept of God, "Proven" false. Everything just connects! There are so many explanations for the reason the Earth is the way it is now in the Bible.
If God created the world for humans, why is it that of all the water on Earth, 70% is salt water?
If you would study the book of Genesis you might figure that out. Man fked that up, not God. If you'll look into it you'll also find out why man could live so long, why there's several continents instead of a Pangaea, and just generally why Earth is the way it is.
This isn't the post Ted was talking about.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6914|Canberra, AUS
Lemaitre was a physicist first and priest second it should be said. One of a few outstanding physicists running around in the first half of last century.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
-Sh1fty-
plundering yee booty
+510|5713|Ventura, California

EVieira wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:



No but seriously, I don't understand how a bing bang makes sense. "So first, we had nothing and that nothing MAGICALLY evolved from a little cell to 6 billion humans, a motherfreaking huge earth with diverse and complex ecosystems and weather.

All this from nothing...

sure

From a non-religious point of view, it makes more sense that it was somehow created by somebody or something than it just magically materializing.

lol nothing -> something

makes perfect sense
Shifty is right on this point. Science is completely stumped as to what happened before the big bang. We are supposed to accept that there is no "before" the big bang, because theoretically time didn't exist before the big bang. That's about as hard to prove as the existence of God. Maybe even harder...
Nice to see somebody debate in a civil manner.

Wish ya'll could be like him.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5941|College Park, MD

-Sh1fty- wrote:

why there's several continents instead of a Pangaea
Plate tectonics
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6740|so randum

AussieReaper wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:


If God created the world for humans, why is it that of all the water on Earth, 70% is salt water?
If you would study the book of Genesis you might figure that out. Man fked that up, not God. If you'll look into it you'll also find out why man could live so long, why there's several continents instead of a Pangaea, and just generally why Earth is the way it is.
This isn't the post Ted was talking about.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6392|what

-Sh1fty- wrote:

EVieira wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:



No but seriously, I don't understand how a bing bang makes sense. "So first, we had nothing and that nothing MAGICALLY evolved from a little cell to 6 billion humans, a motherfreaking huge earth with diverse and complex ecosystems and weather.

All this from nothing...

sure

From a non-religious point of view, it makes more sense that it was somehow created by somebody or something than it just magically materializing.

lol nothing -> something

makes perfect sense
Shifty is right on this point. Science is completely stumped as to what happened before the big bang. We are supposed to accept that there is no "before" the big bang, because theoretically time didn't exist before the big bang. That's about as hard to prove as the existence of God. Maybe even harder...
Nice to see somebody debate in a civil manner.

Wish ya'll could be like him.
Source your material are we will debate better.

Please note "The Bible" is not a source. Fictional materials may not be used as evidence.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5477|Cleveland, Ohio
mods fail
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6392|what

11 Bravo wrote:

mods fail
It's all part of Gods plan. He works in mysterious ways.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5477|Cleveland, Ohio

AussieReaper wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

mods fail
It's all part of Gods plan. He works in mysterious ways.
you are god apprently because you can run around here and nothing happens to you.  i bow to you.
-Sh1fty-
plundering yee booty
+510|5713|Ventura, California

AussieReaper wrote:

Source your material are we will debate better.

Please note "The Bible" is not a source. Fictional materials may not be used as evidence.
You don't know if it's fictional or not. You assume it is fictional.

Well here's the thing guys, tonight I have Bible study so you can expect a veryyyyyy long reply to dayarath's TL:DR text (No, I did read it).

So get some popcorn.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard