Pages: 1 2 3 4

 

2010-12-23 11:16:41
Morpheus
This shit still going?
+508|6274|The Mitten

Kmar wrote:

Morpheus wrote:

I'm also curious how many people (critics of it) have read the book - at least, it would be interesting to see if it has any value for law enforcement/legal prosecution.... or if they're simply reacting to the title (kind of like Andres Serrano's Piss Chirst...)
I would hope that officers, detectives, parental educators, criminal profilers, and other investigators read it .. since it is a supposed how to book. It should be full of clues and signs.
Yea.
That's what I mean.
It could even be useful in something such as exposing any loopholes... actual loopholes, not semantic bullshit.
EE (hats
2010-12-23 11:19:32
EVieira
Member
+105|6753|Lutenblaag, Molvania

Macbeth wrote:

Why?
Well, I'm guessing you don't have kids. But let's say you did, would you be confortable knowing the guy who wrote a pedophile's guide is loose?
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
2010-12-23 11:22:05
Morpheus
This shit still going?
+508|6274|The Mitten

EVieira wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Why?
Well, I'm guessing you don't have kids. But let's say you did, would you be confortable knowing the guy who wrote a pedophile's guide is loose?
...There's a reason Macbeth doesn't have kids



EE (hats
2010-12-23 11:22:35
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5633|London, England

EVieira wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Why?
Well, I'm guessing you don't have kids. But let's say you did, would you be confortable knowing the guy who wrote a pedophile's guide is loose?
Umm, why not? Better the evil you know...
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
2010-12-23 11:26:00
EVieira
Member
+105|6753|Lutenblaag, Molvania

JohnG@lt wrote:

EVieira wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Why?
Well, I'm guessing you don't have kids. But let's say you did, would you be confortable knowing the guy who wrote a pedophile's guide is loose?
Umm, why not? Better the evil you know...
Better the evil I know locked up...
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
2010-12-23 11:35:21
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5860

EVieira wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Why?
Well, I'm guessing you don't have kids. But let's say you did, would you be confortable knowing the guy who wrote a pedophile's guide is loose?
Yeah since the vast majority of sexual crimes agaisnt kids are done by relatives and the random pedo snatching a kid thing is very very rare.
2010-12-23 11:36:43
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5633|London, England
https://the-grayline.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/free-candy-van.jpg
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
2010-12-23 11:38:36
Morpheus
This shit still going?
+508|6274|The Mitten

JohnG@lt wrote:

https://the-grayline.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/free-candy-van.jpg
I dunno. Seems legit.
Is that your car?
EE (hats
2010-12-23 11:39:56
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5633|London, England

Morpheus wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

http://the-grayline.com/wp-content/uplo … dy-van.jpg
I dunno. Seems legit.
Is that your car?
Macbeth rocks dat shiz.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
2010-12-23 11:44:43
13rin
Member
+977|6754

Kmar wrote:

tuckergustav wrote:

Kmar wrote:


Serious.. in fact the guy said he has never abused a child, because the kid was ok with it.
wut.  That's disgusting.
Let me give you the short version of what the sheriff did. He asked the author of the book in colorado to send him an autographed copy to florida.  He did, and now he is being arrested for distributing child porn.. or some charge like that.
Obscenity charge.  I hope he rots in jail.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
2010-12-23 11:46:23
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5633|London, England

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Kmar wrote:

tuckergustav wrote:


wut.  That's disgusting.
Let me give you the short version of what the sheriff did. He asked the author of the book in colorado to send him an autographed copy to florida.  He did, and now he is being arrested for distributing child porn.. or some charge like that.
Obscenity charge.  I hope he rots in jail.
So much for your belief in small government.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
2010-12-23 14:15:07
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6680|North Carolina

Macbeth wrote:

Is there anyone here who seriously thinks this guy should go to prison for writing this book?
*shrugs*  I don't have kids, so I really don't know how I'd feel if I did, but as a single person without kids, honestly...

I'm not sure if I care either way.  You could say it's First Amendment protected speech in some ways, but the opposing argument is valid as well.

It's basically rights vs. security.  I often lean in favor of security, but I'm not sure where to lean on this one.
2010-12-23 15:39:22
Ticia
Member
+73|5610
At least the title of the book says it all, don't like it don't buy it.

Lolita would never be published today and Lewis Carrol of Alice in the Wonderland  fame would be locked up for life these days.
2010-12-23 15:40:32
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6680|North Carolina

Ticia wrote:

At least the title of the book says it all, don't like it don't buy it.

Lolita would never be published today and Lewis Carrol of Alice in the Wonderland  fame would be locked up for life these days.
Well, neither of them were quite as direct about it as this guy though....
2010-12-23 15:40:39
13rin
Member
+977|6754

JohnG@lt wrote:

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Kmar wrote:


Let me give you the short version of what the sheriff did. He asked the author of the book in colorado to send him an autographed copy to florida.  He did, and now he is being arrested for distributing child porn.. or some charge like that.
Obscenity charge.  I hope he rots in jail.
So much for your belief in small government.
What?  How does me wanting to lock up peods trash my liking of small government?  Ever heard of private prisons?  They're all the rage nowadays...
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
2010-12-23 15:41:46
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5534|foggy bottom
with a title like that and a photo of an under aged child, its a crime.  no debate about it.
Tu Stultus Es
2010-12-23 15:44:24
Ticia
Member
+73|5610

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:

At least the title of the book says it all, don't like it don't buy it.

Lolita would never be published today and Lewis Carrol of Alice in the Wonderland  fame would be locked up for life these days.
Well, neither of them were quite as direct about it as this guy though....
Exactly. No false advertising, if this book ends up in your hand then is all on you,man.
2010-12-23 15:45:43
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6680|North Carolina

Ticia wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:

At least the title of the book says it all, don't like it don't buy it.

Lolita would never be published today and Lewis Carrol of Alice in the Wonderland  fame would be locked up for life these days.
Well, neither of them were quite as direct about it as this guy though....
Exactly. No false advertising, if this book ends up in your hand then is all on you,man.
lol...  I don't know..  The girl in Lolita was older than the kids this guy is targeting....
2010-12-23 15:50:34
Ticia
Member
+73|5610

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Well, neither of them were quite as direct about it as this guy though....
Exactly. No false advertising, if this book ends up in your hand then is all on you,man.
lol...  I don't know..  The girl in Lolita was older than the kids this guy is targeting....


https://img688.imageshack.us/img688/7629/pedophile.jpg
2010-12-23 15:55:49
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6680|North Carolina

Ticia wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:


Exactly. No false advertising, if this book ends up in your hand then is all on you,man.
lol...  I don't know..  The girl in Lolita was older than the kids this guy is targeting....


http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/7629/pedophile.jpg
lol...   but seriously...  even though both actions are illegal, an adult having sex with a 16 year old is different from an adult having sex with an 8 year old.   Both are considered pedophilia by the law, but clinically, the term pedophilia specifically references prepubescent minors.

Again, it's a gross topic, but it's a distinction worth mentioning....
2010-12-23 15:58:52
Ticia
Member
+73|5610

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


lol...  I don't know..  The girl in Lolita was older than the kids this guy is targeting....


http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/7629/pedophile.jpg
lol...   but seriously...  even though both actions are illegal, an adult having sex with a 16 year old is different from an adult having sex with an 8 year old.   Both are considered pedophilia by the law, but clinically, the term pedophilia specifically references prepubescent minors.

Again, it's a gross topic, but it's a distinction worth mentioning....
Lolita was 12 and a half.
2010-12-23 15:59:25
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6680|North Carolina

Ticia wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:




http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/7629/pedophile.jpg
lol...   but seriously...  even though both actions are illegal, an adult having sex with a 16 year old is different from an adult having sex with an 8 year old.   Both are considered pedophilia by the law, but clinically, the term pedophilia specifically references prepubescent minors.

Again, it's a gross topic, but it's a distinction worth mentioning....
Lolita was 12 and a half.
Shit...   I guess I should have read the book...  I only saw part of the newer movie.
2010-12-23 18:45:32
EVieira
Member
+105|6753|Lutenblaag, Molvania
Lolita is a story, its not a fucking pedophile guide. Plenty of books talk of murders, that dosen't make them murder guides.
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
2010-12-23 19:23:46
mikkel
Member
+383|6876

Kmar wrote:

Yea, and there are worse things that can happen to you besides a conviction. If pedoman is going to scurf the line why not scurf the line with him?
Well, government isn't supposed to "scurf the line" with anyone. Either it's illegal or it isn't. Harassing an individual with procedural annoyances is an abuse of mandate.
2010-12-23 20:37:19
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6876|132 and Bush

DBBrinson1 wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

DBBrinson1 wrote:


Obscenity charge.  I hope he rots in jail.
So much for your belief in small government.
What?  How does me wanting to lock up peods trash my liking of small government?  Ever heard of private prisons?  They're all the rage nowadays...
Vigilante justice fits right in with small government.



Lol
Xbone Stormsurgezz

 

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard