Go back and reread what I've said in this thread. We can't expect a eastern euro country to have the same sort of infrastructure and ability we have in disposing of animals humanely.jord wrote:
What circumstances would condone someone choosing to drown animals rather than smply hit them with a blunt object? I can't think of any and I have somewhat of an imagination.Macbeth wrote:
Again we don't know the overall circumstances to make any assumptions.jord wrote:
Are soviet weapons and ammunition really that expensive in the eastern bloc?
Do they not have animal centres?
Even if its a no to both, one strong blow from a blunt object is more humane than drowning. Or can they not afford blunt objects in this backwards states?
Also to kill a baby seal it sometimes takes two or three whacks...
2,3,4,5 whacks, its always going to be quicker. Blunt trauma to the head is less painful than drowning.
Secondly holding down a puppy and smashing it's head in 5 times with a brick hurts a lot more than drowning. Their little lungs would fill up with water very quickly.