ATG
Banned
+5,233|6814|Global Command
Here we go again.

Remember you heard it from me first; this will become another epic cluster fuck.

We have BP doing ' risky ' drilling having been given special rights to drill offshore after having created an artificial island.


But BP’s project, called Liberty, has been exempted as regulators have granted it status as an “onshore” project even though it is about three miles off the coast in the Beaufort Sea. The reason: it sits on an artificial island — a 31-acre pile of gravel in about 22 feet of water — built by BP.
It really sucks being right about so many bad things.

Rather than conducting their own independent analysis, federal regulators, in a break from usual practice, allowed BP in 2007 to write its own environmental review for the project as well as its own consultation documents relating to the Endangered Species Act, according to two scientists from the Alaska office of the federal Mineral Management Service that oversees drilling.
Oh. My. God.

“The whole process for approving Liberty was bizarre,” one of the federal scientists said.

The scientists and other critics say they are worried about a replay of the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico because the Liberty project involves a method of drilling called extended reach that experts say is more prone to the types of gas kicks that triggered the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon.

“It makes no sense,” said Rebecca Noblin, the Alaska director for the Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental watchdog group. “BP pushes the envelope in the gulf and ends up causing the moratorium. And now in the Arctic they are forging ahead again with untested technology, and as a result they’re the only ones left being allowed to drill there.”

BP has defended the project in its proposal, saying it is safe and environmentally friendly. It declined to respond to requests for further comment.
Sound familiar???


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/24/us/24rig.html

Last edited by ATG (2010-06-24 20:07:08)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina
...and people say we have too much regulation.

It's not that it's too much...  it's just fucking ridiculous.  If we were serious about protecting the environment, we would've made the switch away from fossil fuels and to nuclear power years ago.

With respect to America, environmental policy is almost as much of a joke as the enforcement of its immigration laws are.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6814|Global Command
I so would like to be at the day when there is an alternative to gas powered cars.

Pollution sucks.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6833|San Diego, CA, USA

ATG wrote:

I so would like to be at the day when there is an alternative to gas powered cars.

Pollution sucks.
It would be nice we wouldn't need petroleum products to run our world, but until then we need to keep drilling and exploring while exacting the energy responsibly.  We should continue to invest in technologies that eventually, one day, would not require us to use a drop of oil, but until then....*clear throat*...Drill baby drill.


With all the lack of regulations (which I though Liberal Democrats were all about), lately I'm surprised we haven't seen more of these types of disasters.

Oh, and for the record, this buddy-buddy lack of oversight goes back through Bush and into the Clinton years according to all accounts so far.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6866|the dank(super) side of Oregon

Harmor wrote:

Oh, and for the record, this buddy-buddy lack of oversight goes back through Bush and into the Clinton years according to all accounts so far.
It goes back further than Clinton.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6833|San Diego, CA, USA

Reciprocity wrote:

Harmor wrote:

Oh, and for the record, this buddy-buddy lack of oversight goes back through Bush and into the Clinton years according to all accounts so far.
It goes back further than Clinton.
I'm interested how far back this lack of oversight goes back?  Can we pin point it to a specific date or administration?
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Harmor wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

Harmor wrote:

Oh, and for the record, this buddy-buddy lack of oversight goes back through Bush and into the Clinton years according to all accounts so far.
It goes back further than Clinton.
I'm interested how far back this lack of oversight goes back?  Can we pin point it to a specific date or administration?
George Washington, April 30, 1789.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6814|Global Command
Cmon.

GW was the perfect politician/leader.

What are you trying to say???
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6866|the dank(super) side of Oregon

Harmor wrote:

I'm interested how far back this lack of oversight goes back?  Can we pin point it to a specific date or administration?
Since inception, from what I've read and heard.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Harmor wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:


It goes back further than Clinton.
I'm interested how far back this lack of oversight goes back?  Can we pin point it to a specific date or administration?
George Washington, April 30, 1789.
Most of the problems actually stem from Nixon's era.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Harmor wrote:


I'm interested how far back this lack of oversight goes back?  Can we pin point it to a specific date or administration?
George Washington, April 30, 1789.
Most of the problems actually stem from Nixon's era.
I'd thrust the blame on FDR. The office of the president wasn't seen as omnipotent until he came into power. The country has been fucked ever since.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


George Washington, April 30, 1789.
Most of the problems actually stem from Nixon's era.
I'd thrust the blame on FDR. The office of the president wasn't seen as omnipotent until he came into power. The country has been fucked ever since.
Lack of proper regulations allowed the Stock Market Crash to occur.  The hands-off approach of people like Harding and Coolidge was shown to be just as ineffective with market policy as it was with sectional interests when Buchanan sat back and let things degenerate into secession.

The point is...  sometimes, the government has to get involved.  The Great Depression was one of those periods.  If FDR had been hands-off through that time, we never would've been ready to enter WW2.  In fact, we probably wouldn't have entered it at all.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,816|6391|eXtreme to the maX
I bet if you looked into what any oil company is doing you'd find something, the mess in Nigeria for a start.
Fuck Israel

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard