fail
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
troll?HaiBai wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:
The correct list:
Worth a buy - Must haves or you should atleast try them out before moving on!
- Mass Effect 2
- Fallout 3
- Empire: Total War
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Worth a try - Some love them others loathe them
- Resident Evil 5
- Batman: Arkham Asylum
- Grand Theft Auto: Episodes from Liberty City
- BioShock 2
- Dragon Age: Origins
- The Lord of the Rings Online: Siege of Mirkwood
- Need for Speed Shift
- Left 4 Dead
- Left 4 Dead 2
Oldies but goldies - Games that are not recent but still worth a try!
- Black & White
- Half-Life 2
- Bioshock
- Unreal Tournament
- Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Chaos Theory
- Starcraft
- Half-Life
- Homeworld
- Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri
- The Sims
- F1 Challenge '99-'02
- Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Pandora Tomorrow
- Madden NFL 2005
- The Orange Box
---
megafail
Interesting thread. I have played only Mass effect from these games. May be that is because I don't find PC games that much interesting as the consoles and play stations. There is more fun in that games rather than PC games. I think PC games need to give some interesting and different flavors.
Oh boy...nairatyler wrote:
Interesting thread. I have played only Mass effect from these games. May be that is because I don't find PC games that much interesting as the consoles and play stations. There is more fun in that games rather than PC games. I think PC games need to give some interesting and different flavors.
red faction
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
nairatyler wrote:
Interesting thread. I have played only Mass effect from these games. May be that is because I don't find PC games that much interesting as the consoles and play stations. There is more fun in that games rather than PC games. I think PC games need to give some interesting and different flavors.
either he is a troll or a complete idiot... but equally uselessNordemus wrote:
http://nolifing.com/files/e3f292844a15.jpgnairatyler wrote:
Interesting thread. I have played only Mass effect from these games. May be that is because I don't find PC games that much interesting as the consoles and play stations. There is more fun in that games rather than PC games. I think PC games need to give some interesting and different flavors.
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
it's androoz you moronsFloppY_ wrote:
either he is a troll or a complete idiot... but equally uselessNordemus wrote:
http://nolifing.com/files/e3f292844a15.jpgnairatyler wrote:
Interesting thread. I have played only Mass effect from these games. May be that is because I don't find PC games that much interesting as the consoles and play stations. There is more fun in that games rather than PC games. I think PC games need to give some interesting and different flavors.
there's quite a few of us playing WoW now @ Ravenholdt EU. very enjoyable, active server. newcomers and old-timers alike. TS fun. casual gang-banging. griefing. much chatting of shit. message me if you want to get involved . . . it beats omgpop. yeah, im looking at you, matty.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Playing warcraft there ziquey???Uzique wrote:
there's quite a few of us playing WoW now @ Ravenholdt EU. very enjoyable, active server. newcomers and old-timers alike. TS fun. casual gang-banging. griefing. much chatting of shit. message me if you want to get involved . . . it beats omgpop. yeah, im looking at you, matty.
I still think RA3 is more of a worth a try than a failgame. It feel s exactly like Red Alert 2, has full motion video and gives us a third faction that isn't alien.
Hitman series
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
RA3 felt nothing like RA2unnamednewbie13 wrote:
I still think RA3 is more of a worth a try than a failgame. It feel s exactly like Red Alert 2, has full motion video and gives us a third faction that isn't alien.
RA2 YR has a 3rd faction that isn't alien.
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
I was talking about the Scrin from C&C3/4, tbh, and Yuri doesn't really count because he originates from the Soviet campaign along with an improved version of the cloning stuff. In RA3, when time gets messed up (again), it creates the vastly different Empire of Japan, led at first by SULU. The interface is tweaked a bit, but it doesn't hamper the feel. Overall, the game has Red Alert 2's spirit of goofiness.FloppY_ wrote:
RA3 felt nothing like RA2unnamednewbie13 wrote:
I still think RA3 is more of a worth a try than a failgame. It feel s exactly like Red Alert 2, has full motion video and gives us a third faction that isn't alien.
RA2 YR has a 3rd faction that isn't alien.
Bear cannon =/= giant ants.
Plus, who can say no to Soviet/Hell March music?
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2010-05-11 14:37:04)
The UI was completely thrown away and replaced by one similar to Generals / Starcraftunnamednewbie13 wrote:
I was talking about the Scrin from C&C3/4, tbh, and Yuri doesn't really count because he originates from the Soviet campaign along with an improved version of the cloning stuff. In RA3, when time gets messed up (again), it creates the vastly different Empire of Japan, led at first by SULU. The interface is tweaked a bit, but it doesn't hamper the feel. Overall, the game has Red Alert 2's spirit of goofiness.FloppY_ wrote:
RA3 felt nothing like RA2unnamednewbie13 wrote:
I still think RA3 is more of a worth a try than a failgame. It feel s exactly like Red Alert 2, has full motion video and gives us a third faction that isn't alien.
RA2 YR has a 3rd faction that isn't alien.
Bear cannon =/= giant ants.
Plus, who can say no to Soviet/Hell March music?
Yuri's army was completely different in playstyle from the soviets
RA3 is too goofy tbh
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
What, and giant ants and Russians fighting dinosaurs wasn't? Plus Yuri like the reincarnation of 50's cheese. RA3 didn't even have a moon base of doom.FloppY_ wrote:
The UI was completely thrown away and replaced by one similar to Generals / Starcraftunnamednewbie13 wrote:
I was talking about the Scrin from C&C3/4, tbh, and Yuri doesn't really count because he originates from the Soviet campaign along with an improved version of the cloning stuff. In RA3, when time gets messed up (again), it creates the vastly different Empire of Japan, led at first by SULU. The interface is tweaked a bit, but it doesn't hamper the feel. Overall, the game has Red Alert 2's spirit of goofiness.FloppY_ wrote:
RA3 felt nothing like RA2
RA2 YR has a 3rd faction that isn't alien.
Bear cannon =/= giant ants.
Plus, who can say no to Soviet/Hell March music?
Yuri's army was completely different in playstyle from the soviets
RA3 is too goofy tbh
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2010-05-11 14:44:31)
Meh...unnamednewbie13 wrote:
What, and giant ants and Russians fighting dinosaurs wasn't? Plus Yuri like the reincarnation of 50's cheese. RA3 didn't even have a moon base of doom.FloppY_ wrote:
The UI was completely thrown away and replaced by one similar to Generals / Starcraftunnamednewbie13 wrote:
I was talking about the Scrin from C&C3/4, tbh, and Yuri doesn't really count because he originates from the Soviet campaign along with an improved version of the cloning stuff. In RA3, when time gets messed up (again), it creates the vastly different Empire of Japan, led at first by SULU. The interface is tweaked a bit, but it doesn't hamper the feel. Overall, the game has Red Alert 2's spirit of goofiness.
Bear cannon =/= giant ants.
Plus, who can say no to Soviet/Hell March music?
Yuri's army was completely different in playstyle from the soviets
RA3 is too goofy tbh
I still think RA3 sucked balls where RA2 was pure win
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
normally i'd say "sadly... yes".SonderKommando wrote:
Playing warcraft there ziquey???Uzique wrote:
there's quite a few of us playing WoW now @ Ravenholdt EU. very enjoyable, active server. newcomers and old-timers alike. TS fun. casual gang-banging. griefing. much chatting of shit. message me if you want to get involved . . . it beats omgpop. yeah, im looking at you, matty.
but "sadly", there are no other good games that hold as much attention and have as much of a lulz-factor
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
I found my install discs yesterday and was like hmmmmmmmmm... but i bought those back in 2008, would take a year and half to patch up at this point, right?
(tell me yes to keep me from playing)
(tell me yes to keep me from playing)
no the game actually streamlines content-delivery now. it downloads new continents, areas, items etc. in the background as you play
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
wow was actually sort of fun.Uzique wrote:
no the game actually streamlines content-delivery now. it downloads new continents, areas, items etc. in the background as you play
i just felt like it didnt have a point.
i got to level 60, spent 2 weeks grinding BGs and got BIS pvp stuff for my pally
then it was time to buy the expansion packs... but i really didnt think it was worth spending $55 so i could get to 80 to be in the same situation. owait, then id be able to raid for gear so i can raid for the next gear so i can raid for the next gear so i can raid for the next gear.
yeah, thats why i didnt buy them
can't even be bothered to reply to that
you thought WoW sucked because you disliked how MMO's have progressive, constantly-updating content? okay
i didnt buy bc2 because it was just like, get to top rank, then wow one map killing people so then i can load the next map to wow just kill more people and then just load the NEXT map to kill WOW ONLY MORE PEOPLE. it just didn't seem like it had a finite, end-point. it sucked. yeah, that's why i don't play them.
you thought WoW sucked because you disliked how MMO's have progressive, constantly-updating content? okay
i didnt buy bc2 because it was just like, get to top rank, then wow one map killing people so then i can load the next map to wow just kill more people and then just load the NEXT map to kill WOW ONLY MORE PEOPLE. it just didn't seem like it had a finite, end-point. it sucked. yeah, that's why i don't play them.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Oh, you guys <3
What manner of fevered dream is this that the very possibility of agreeing upon "good" and "not good" games would occur here.
What manner of fevered dream is this that the very possibility of agreeing upon "good" and "not good" games would occur here.
Red Alert 3 is awesome, all other people can GTFO. I love the "feel" of the factions, seems much improved from RA2