mikkel
Member
+383|6887

lowing wrote:

mikkel wrote:

lowing wrote:


Might wanna read the OP before posting.
I did, and as far as I can tell, it concerns an elected official uttering her opinion on the matter of religious symbols in public schools. I'm not finding anything to suggest that anyone is forcing anyone to do anything.
Ok I will wait until she gets her way. Can I say it would appear she would force a ban given the proper backing? So put away your scalpel no need to dissect anymore.
"Dissect" what? I'm saying it just like it is. I'm neither dissecting nor postulating anything. If she has the power to remove religious symbols from the classroom, then you can rest assured that it is a democratically granted power, and that the voters can take it away, should they disagree. It's called "democracy", not "force."
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6937|USA

mikkel wrote:

lowing wrote:

mikkel wrote:


I did, and as far as I can tell, it concerns an elected official uttering her opinion on the matter of religious symbols in public schools. I'm not finding anything to suggest that anyone is forcing anyone to do anything.
Ok I will wait until she gets her way. Can I say it would appear she would force a ban given the proper backing? So put away your scalpel no need to dissect anymore.
"Dissect" what? I'm saying it just like it is. I'm neither dissecting nor postulating anything. If she has the power to remove religious symbols from the classroom, then you can rest assured that it is a democratically granted power, and that the voters can take it away, should they disagree. It's called "democracy", not "force."
whatever, I am not getting into this with you, it does not interest me that much.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina
If they've banned headscarves...  well, I guess that means banning crucifixes is ok too.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6960|Canberra, AUS

Turquoise wrote:

If they've banned headscarves...  well, I guess that means banning crucifixes is ok too.
yah. equality of law etc.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
thraSK
Best ___ in Aus
+57|6268
...schools should be neutral places where children can decide their religious orientation on their own...
I see nothing wrong with this statement
ruisleipa
Member
+149|6508|teh FIN-land

thraSK wrote:

...schools should be neutral places where children can decide their religious orientation on their own...
I see nothing wrong with this statement
there is nothing wrong with it. Lowing's just getting carried away on his anti-mooslim crusade and not bothering to even read the OP he posts ostensibly in support of his own arguments.
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7095|NÃ¥rvei

Religious symbols should be restricted to their churches, mosques etc etc
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Marlo Stanfield
online poker tax cheating
+122|5448

Turquoise wrote:

If they've banned headscarves...  well, I guess that means banning crucifixes is ok too.
Two great European narcotics, alcohol and Christianity.
ruisleipa
Member
+149|6508|teh FIN-land

lowing wrote:

whatever, I am not getting into this with you, it does not interest me that much.
lmfao well it SHOULD interest you because it gives the lie to the whole point of your OP...which you presumably didn't read or understand.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7002

Marlo Stanfield wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

If they've banned headscarves...  well, I guess that means banning crucifixes is ok too.
Two great European narcotics, alcohol and Christianity.
Alcohol was developed in ME first tbh.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6937|USA

ruisleipa wrote:

lowing wrote:

whatever, I am not getting into this with you, it does not interest me that much.
lmfao well it SHOULD interest you because it gives the lie to the whole point of your OP...which you presumably didn't read or understand.
It isn't my OP. and according to you, no one you disagree with, "understands", or they are ignorant, close minded, racist, etc etc.... so no big surprise there.....honestly, your methods of debate are sooooooo rediculous.
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6756

Cybargs wrote:

Marlo Stanfield wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

If they've banned headscarves...  well, I guess that means banning crucifixes is ok too.
Two great European narcotics, alcohol and Christianity.
Alcohol was developed in ME first tbh.
he's trying to be a smartass and quote a philosopher that has nothing to do with the thread at all

religion, opiate of the masses lololol i r smarts
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard