banana
* You may post now
* You may post now
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6979
I think you mean waffle.ebug9 wrote:
banana
* You may post now
i have a question for you canadians.. what do they use on the roads during winter to keep the ice off? My buddy said that you guys use sand and not salt.. true?
i think you mean roflSuperior Mind wrote:
I think you mean waffle.ebug9 wrote:
banana
* You may post now
Both but mostly salt.Runs_with_sciss0rs wrote:
i have a question for you canadians.. what do they use on the roads during winter to keep the ice off? My buddy said that you guys use sand and not salt.. true?
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6979
No, I mean waffle.RTHKI wrote:
i think you mean roflSuperior Mind wrote:
I think you mean waffle.ebug9 wrote:
banana
* You may post now
What's the purpose of sand? It's more expensiveebug9 wrote:
Both but mostly salt.Runs_with_sciss0rs wrote:
i have a question for you canadians.. what do they use on the roads during winter to keep the ice off? My buddy said that you guys use sand and not salt.. true?
Not really sure tbh. It makes an awful mess in the springRuns_with_sciss0rs wrote:
What's the purpose of sand? It's more expensiveebug9 wrote:
Both but mostly salt.Runs_with_sciss0rs wrote:
i have a question for you canadians.. what do they use on the roads during winter to keep the ice off? My buddy said that you guys use sand and not salt.. true?
Ah, sucks, but anyways how is Canada?ebug9 wrote:
Not really sure tbh. It makes an awful mess in the springRuns_with_sciss0rs wrote:
What's the purpose of sand? It's more expensiveebug9 wrote:
Both but mostly salt.
Last edited by Runs_with_sciss0rs (2010-04-13 20:40:03)
Nice I suppose if you don't mind ~4-6 months of winter a year
I live right next to Canada actually, I can just turn my head, look out the window and there it is! I know your pain somewhat.
North-Eastern states had a wicked winter compared to Ontario here in Canada. We had springlike temperatures in March.
Sucks for skiing.
Sucks for skiing.
Ok I'm watching 25th Hour for the first time and Clay Davis just showed up and shieeeeeeeeet
Is The Wire like a tv show related to the movie? I'm a noob
Is The Wire like a tv show related to the movie? I'm a noob
Haha, good one. But it's true!tuckergustav wrote:
"I can see Canada from my house!" Haha...Runs_with_sciss0rs wrote:
I live right next to Canada actually, I can just turn my head, look out the window and there it is! I know your pain somewhat.
No.
Btw, 25th Hour is an awesome movie. Ed Norton is epic.
Btw, 25th Hour is an awesome movie. Ed Norton is epic.
but srsly
everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously. ♥
in the butttazz. wrote:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5389629/what.png
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5389629/what.png
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5389629/what.png
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5389629/what.png
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5389629/what.png
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5389629/what.png
but srsly
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5389629/what.png
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5389629/what.png
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5389629/what.png
G'night BF2s <3
Srsly. When's he gonna get an Oscar13/f/taiwan wrote:
No.
Btw, 25th Hour is an awesome movie. Ed Norton is epic.
you dumb FUCK!13/f/taiwan wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-O382Xi7U4
everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously. ♥
Ed Norton is my favorite actor.. He was amazing in Primal Fearmtb0minime wrote:
Srsly. When's he gonna get an Oscar13/f/taiwan wrote:
No.
Btw, 25th Hour is an awesome movie. Ed Norton is epic.
Relevant Facts: Lord Fairfax died in 1781 and left his property to Thomas Martin. Virginia claimed that the property was theirs in 1777 and conveyed it to David Hunter in 1789. The District Ct granted judgment in favor of Martin. Virginia Court of Appeals reversed in favor of Hunter, the S. Ct. using the Treaties of 1781 and 1794 reversed and remanded in favor of Martin.
Legal Issue: Whether the U.S. Supreme Ct. has absolute appellate power under the Constitution over the individual state’s tribunals?
Holding: The U.S. S. Ct. has absolute appellate power under the Constitution.
Law or Rule(s): Article III U.S. Constitution, Judiciary Act of 1789.
Procedure: Virginia Court of Appeals refused to comply with S. Ct. decision of 1813, issuing a writ of error before the S. Ct. again.
Court Rationale: The U.S. Constitution expressly confers supreme judicial power upon the S. Ct. In all cases and controversy involving issues under the U.S. Constitution’s judicial limitations/powers, the state courts are subservient to that end.
Plaintiff’s Argument: Article III confers appellate power upon the S. Ct. in order to maintain uniformity of judgments throughout the country.
Defendant’s Argument: The S. Ct. does not have absolute appellate jurisdiction, over State Courts, specifically delegated by the Constitution.
Legal Issue: Whether the U.S. Supreme Ct. has absolute appellate power under the Constitution over the individual state’s tribunals?
Holding: The U.S. S. Ct. has absolute appellate power under the Constitution.
Law or Rule(s): Article III U.S. Constitution, Judiciary Act of 1789.
Procedure: Virginia Court of Appeals refused to comply with S. Ct. decision of 1813, issuing a writ of error before the S. Ct. again.
Court Rationale: The U.S. Constitution expressly confers supreme judicial power upon the S. Ct. In all cases and controversy involving issues under the U.S. Constitution’s judicial limitations/powers, the state courts are subservient to that end.
Plaintiff’s Argument: Article III confers appellate power upon the S. Ct. in order to maintain uniformity of judgments throughout the country.
Defendant’s Argument: The S. Ct. does not have absolute appellate jurisdiction, over State Courts, specifically delegated by the Constitution.
Tu Stultus Es
"She ain't nothin' but a spic skank skeezer."