AA just needed that stupid dish to work, to make all aircraft above radar level visible on the map to the AA driver. And then remove the Airplanes "see all manned vehicles" radar.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
AA sucked in BF2, that was the problem. If it was supposed to be rock-paper-scissors balancing:
Tank < Chopper < AA < Tank on and on...
AA died just as easily as a tank, which made it difficult to take down a chopper. Maybe having a MANPADS (aka portable stinger missile) kit would have helped.
That would have raised it's usefulness by so freaking much. Would take skill to kill AA with aircraft then.Ilocano wrote:
AA just needed that stupid dish to work, to make all aircraft above radar level visible on the map to the AA driver. And then remove the Airplanes "see all manned vehicles" radar.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
AA sucked in BF2, that was the problem. If it was supposed to be rock-paper-scissors balancing:
Tank < Chopper < AA < Tank on and on...
AA died just as easily as a tank, which made it difficult to take down a chopper. Maybe having a MANPADS (aka portable stinger missile) kit would have helped.
What was wrong with SF choppers?Bevo wrote:
I could give a fuck about the TV missile, I'd like to see their maneuverability backDoctor Strangelove wrote:
Honestly, the TV Missile was probably the stupidest and most overpowered thing they put into the game.
And of course everyone cried when they nerfed it,
it's literally impossible to do a barrel roll in bc2, you can't even fucking circle strafe because you're flying a big air yacht. yeah I know it's not the same game but looking at the trend from BF2 -> SF -> 2142 -> BC2, it's more and more dumbed down.
You could circle with both of them facing almost completely downwards and never crash. Try that in Vanilla with a cobra, or better yet a Havoc.DrunkFace wrote:
What was wrong with SF choppers?Bevo wrote:
I could give a fuck about the TV missile, I'd like to see their maneuverability backDoctor Strangelove wrote:
Honestly, the TV Missile was probably the stupidest and most overpowered thing they put into the game.
And of course everyone cried when they nerfed it,
it's literally impossible to do a barrel roll in bc2, you can't even fucking circle strafe because you're flying a big air yacht. yeah I know it's not the same game but looking at the trend from BF2 -> SF -> 2142 -> BC2, it's more and more dumbed down.
The Apache was just awesome, and the Hind when used properly was easily the best to circle of any chopper in any BF.
Your argument doesn't make sense.FFLink wrote:
You could circle with both of them facing almost completely downwards and never crash. Try that in Vanilla with a cobra, or better yet a Havoc.DrunkFace wrote:
What was wrong with SF choppers?Bevo wrote:
I could give a fuck about the TV missile, I'd like to see their maneuverability back
it's literally impossible to do a barrel roll in bc2, you can't even fucking circle strafe because you're flying a big air yacht. yeah I know it's not the same game but looking at the trend from BF2 -> SF -> 2142 -> BC2, it's more and more dumbed down.
The Apache was just awesome, and the Hind when used properly was easily the best to circle of any chopper in any BF.
QFTTimmmmaaaaH wrote:
I dont see how BF3 could be anything more than BC2 with planes and more vehicles on slightly larger maps honestly.
It wont be anything genre breaking, as its EA.
Last edited by Spidery_Yoda (2010-02-23 04:53:39)
slam.Lucien wrote:
yellowtext #1 was talking about BFBC2 choppers
yellowtext #2 was talking about SF choppers
your face doesn't make sense
No, just no...killer21 wrote:
I respectfully disagree.King_County_Downy wrote:
Said much better than I did.
I agree completely.
Infantry only can suck it too. The combo of vehicles and ground n pound is what made BF2 unique and awesome. I don't want a FPS game. I want BF2 refined. That is all.
I enjoy raping people with a tank or heli. That was a lot of fun with BF2. However, when they introduced I/O to BF2 with the 1.3 or 1.4 patch (I forget), it brought a new way to play the game. Spam nading aside, it was good times being able to see which people were actually able to shoot someone without using a vehicle. Perhaps it is because of my BHD/DF2 background that I enjoyed I/O so much. That being said, I would be disappointed if they did not include some sort of IO component in BF3. It's not necessarily a deal breaker but I would definitely be disappointed.
You're also stupid. People who know nothing about a game and demand unnecessary changes make meHurricane2k9 wrote:
AA sucked in BF2, that was the problem. If it was supposed to be rock-paper-scissors balancing:
Tank < Chopper < AA < Tank on and on...
AA died just as easily as a tank, which made it difficult to take down a chopper. Maybe having a MANPADS (aka portable stinger missile) kit would have helped.
Last edited by >rush.Durex (2010-02-23 05:57:23)
Should just limit everyone to one grenade imo (replenished by ammo packs)Mitch wrote:
They need to make bf3 like bf2 1.2 or even the final fixed 1.3 but with servers with the option of "inf only no explosives" or even just c4 explosives. it would be a way to stop the gay fucking claywhoring and nade spamming.
i miss bf2 =[
lol l2comprehension.Lucien wrote:
yellowtext #1 was talking about BFBC2 choppers
yellowtext #2 was talking about SF choppers
your face doesn't make sense
Well they had to do something to nerf pilots. Very rarely could you ever see someone go 25-1 in a tank but it happened regularly in choppers and planes. Yes, it took skill for a pilot to go 25-1 but even the most hardcore pilot should surely be able to see that they were massively overpowered with no natural counter.DrunkFace wrote:
lol l2comprehension.Lucien wrote:
yellowtext #1 was talking about BFBC2 choppers
yellowtext #2 was talking about SF choppers
your face doesn't make sense
He's talking about a 'trend' in chopper manoeuvrability being diminished through the various progressions of the BF series specifically barrel rolls and circle strafing, but then claims that the SF choppers (the second of the 4 progressions stated) have better manoeuvrability, specifically circle strafing which contradicts the trend and his whole argument.
