Announcement

Join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/nf43FxS
Discuss.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+1,746|4996|USA

Does it have the FCM F1?
coke
Aye up duck!
+435|4933|England. Stoke

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Does it have the FCM F1?
Nope. Need multi-turret implementing first.
Although there are other "multi-turret" tanks in the game. And apparently it is in development tech tree as a premium tank
https://alternathistory.org.ua/files/FiiHX%5B1%5D.jpg

Last edited by coke (2013-08-08 19:01:38)

unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+1,746|4996|USA

What a beast. rofl. But I could imagine it being specifically targeted like the Galaxy X in STO.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+556|4938|Purplicious Wisconsin
They still haven't fucking implemented multi-turret/gun function? WHY THE FUCK HAVE THEY NOT, AFTER ALL THIS FUCKING TIME ADDING MORE TANKS AND FEATURES THAT I  CARE LESS FOR ,  HAVE THEY NOT IMPLEMENTED IT? IT'S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE AND SHOULD BE VERY EASY TO IMPLEMENT!!!

God... I am happy I don't play this game anymore, the lack of effort of fixing current vehicles is sad, they released British tanks and tier 10 mediums/light tanks too early. Then again, this game was released too early to begin with. Yes, yes, Coke, I'm moaning, blah blah blah.

edit

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

What a beast. rofl. But I could imagine it being specifically targeted like the Galaxy X in STO.
It has a 90mm gun along with a 47mm, it'd suck compared to the Maus and E100(bigger beasts). Fun tank it was to use in RUSE though, despite being slow, it was cheaper than other super heavies and duelpurpose, get at least 5 and laugh at them shooting down aircraft targeting them.

Last edited by War Man (2013-08-08 19:58:42)

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
coke
Aye up duck!
+435|4933|England. Stoke
TBH multi turret isn't something that I'm demanding there aren't many tanks that would utilise it, more important things to working on.
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+350|4941|Riva, MD
It's bordering on ridiculous how many tanks they've implemented that have a 2nd turret that doesn't function yet, that's the only thing for me.

A lot of the French TDs seem to have a very small-caliber gun on top that would be great for taking out small fast flankers, I can't wait to see that
coke
Aye up duck!
+435|4933|England. Stoke
Those are just defensive/AA machine guns though.
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+350|4941|Riva, MD
One or more of the early American tanks mounts a usable .50 machine gun so I don't think it's completely out of the question.  The second turrets might have upgradeable guns as well sort of like how you can upgrade the second and third guns on your plane in WoWP.
coke
Aye up duck!
+435|4933|England. Stoke
I really don't see the point to be honest. They will useless at anything above tier 1 or 2 and on the french td's have no depression whatsoever.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+556|4938|Purplicious Wisconsin
The B1 bis and m3 lee need to be able to use their second guns. Sure the m3's 37mm isn't that great, but it's good enough against fast light tanks that can immobilize it and easily flank the tank. B1 Bis' 75mm howirzer also isn't all that, but at least it gives it a better chance against the m3 lee which kicks the bis' ass.

Last edited by War Man (2013-08-09 10:33:32)

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
coke
Aye up duck!
+435|4933|England. Stoke
Yeah fair enough with those tanks where the "secondary" armament is proper gun then fair enough. There's also the Churchill I with the 3-inch howitzer and the Maus with it's 75mm (although can't see that being much use) and the AT 7/8 with it's 20mm auto-cannon which would be interesting. But when they are just mg's primarily for AA defence then they really don't need to be implemented.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+1,746|4996|USA

coke wrote:

TBH multi turret isn't something that I'm demanding there aren't many tanks that would utilise it, more important things to working on.
wtb mammoth tank.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+556|4938|Purplicious Wisconsin

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

coke wrote:

TBH multi turret isn't something that I'm demanding there aren't many tanks that would utilise it, more important things to working on.
wtb mammoth tank.
He mentioned the Maus 75mm already.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+1,746|4996|USA

no, this:

https://media.desura.com/images/groups/1/1/897/Mammoth.jpg
coke
Aye up duck!
+435|4933|England. Stoke
Matilda oh how I love thee...
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/8652/shot_018.jpg
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/8652/shot_019.jpg
Took 13 hits and bounced 10 of them.

Last edited by coke (2013-08-10 09:53:27)

coke
Aye up duck!
+435|4933|England. Stoke
More Matilda goodness:
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/8652/shot_020.jpg
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/8652/shot_021.jpg
Phatmatt
Vroom Vroom
+298|4413|Canada

What a horrible team I had.. 
https://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/phatmatt0005/shot_010.jpg
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+350|4941|Riva, MD
Bought my first premium, the E-25, and I LOVE it.

It's like everything I wished the Stug could be has finally been realized.  Much faster, better armor, faster firing + more accurate L70 gun, well over twice as much HP, more ramming power and an even better camo rating.  It's a Tier VII but I read on the wiki that it has special MM privileges of only being put in up to Tier VIII games so it's not so bad.  Makes about 20K a round after repairs/ammo too.
Extra Medium
THE UZI SLAYER
+79|2420|Oklahoma
Bad game is bad.
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+350|4941|Riva, MD
Why do you think it's bad?
jsnipy
...
+3,274|4747|...

world of turtles
Extra Medium
THE UZI SLAYER
+79|2420|Oklahoma

_j5689_ wrote:

Why do you think it's bad?
1.  Horrific, incompetent developer team.  Easily the worst development team in the gaming industry.
2.  Horrible coding and formula's (MM, pen amounts, RNG)
3.  Literally, the worst community in the history of online games.  Either rabidly elitist or full retard.
4.  Incredible time sink or incredible cash sink, your choice.
5.  Repetitive to the MAX.
6.  Overall, uninspired, unintelligent and horrible executed game mechanics and concepts.


Why do you think it's good?  Because tanks?  Because explosions?
Adams_BJ
Warman is a hermaphrodite.
+2,027|4847|Little Bentcock

Extra Medium wrote:

_j5689_ wrote:

Why do you think it's bad?
1.  Horrific, incompetent developer team.  Easily the worst development team in the gaming industry.
2.  Horrible coding and formula's (MM, pen amounts, RNG)
3.  Literally, the worst community in the history of online games.  Either rabidly elitist or full retard.
4.  Incredible time sink or incredible cash sink, your choice.
5.  Repetitive to the MAX.
6.  Overall, uninspired, unintelligent and horrible executed game mechanics and concepts.


Why do you think it's good?  Because tanks?  Because explosions?
That's how I feel
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+350|4941|Riva, MD
If you order a premium ship for $30, you can now get into the World of Warships closed beta:

https://na.wargaming.net/shop/wows/

So far I'm liking it a lot and there's a very healthy amount of people already in, even so early on.  I think this one has the potential to be more popular than World of Tanks.  All the naval combat people have been left without another good multiplayer game since Battlestations: Midway & Pacific.
Adams_BJ
Warman is a hermaphrodite.
+2,027|4847|Little Bentcock
You played warthunder jnumbes?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2019 Jeff Minard