OFP2 graphics and map size, but with classes AND CUSTOMIZED WEAPONS JESUS FUCKING CHRIST.
OFP2 was going to be perfect if they had proper fucking dedicated servers.
OFP2 was going to be perfect if they had proper fucking dedicated servers.
Liar.Cybargs wrote:
OFP2 graphics and map size, but with classes AND CUSTOMIZED WEAPONS JESUS FUCKING CHRIST.
OFP2 was going to be perfect if they had proper fucking dedicated servers.
OFP2 WAS A FUCKING GOOD GAME OK IF THEY MADE IT PROPERLY FUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKIconic Irony wrote:
Liar.Cybargs wrote:
OFP2 graphics and map size, but with classes AND CUSTOMIZED WEAPONS JESUS FUCKING CHRIST.
OFP2 was going to be perfect if they had proper fucking dedicated servers.
Tiger Woods: Big Pimping Edition!
Juggle a world class pro golfing career with a world class adultering career...
"EA Sports, don't hate the player it's in the game!"
Juggle a world class pro golfing career with a world class adultering career...
"EA Sports, don't hate the player it's in the game!"
An online RTS combined with an FPS, so infantry and vehicles on the ground will be controlled via players by FPS, while the RTS'ers will see a traditional RTS game screen with resources and a general view of the FPS infantry/vehicles, with the ability to order the FPS players to certain objectives etc.
Last edited by Laura (2009-12-15 17:36:39)
Charles Manson: The Game - Special Sharon Tate Edition
sounds boring, you don't even get to do anything...Poseidon wrote:
Charles Manson: The Game - Special Sharon Tate Edition
I know games like that, linksLaura wrote:
An online RTS combined with an FPS, so infantry and vehicles on the ground will be controlled via players by FPS, while the RTS'ers will see a traditional RTS game screen with resources and a general view of the FPS infantry/vehicles, with the ability to order the FPS players to certain objectives etc.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=121742
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=116857
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Stargate game like starcraft though
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6909
1000 lives. Nightmare mode. 4 bullets. Last level.
aids
How about Vampires vs Africans with aids instead?jsnipy wrote:
aids
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
why does it have to be africans? why can't it be wisconsinans?War Man wrote:
How about Vampires vs Africans with aids instead?jsnipy wrote:
aids
Vampires vs Liberal Senators and their aids?
^That could be one
What's a wisconsinan?=NHB=Shadow wrote:
why does it have to be africans? why can't it be wisconsinans?War Man wrote:
How about Vampires vs Africans with aids instead?jsnipy wrote:
aids
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
I don't know but its one of the words Lil Wayne raps aboutWar Man wrote:
^That could be oneWhat's a wisconsinan?=NHB=Shadow wrote:
why does it have to be africans? why can't it be wisconsinans?War Man wrote:
How about Vampires vs Africans with aids instead?
MMOFPS with a tad bit of an rpg and simulater feel to it. It will be a Sci Fi game with a bunch of guns, ships, and vehicles. You can buy that stuff or learn to create your own. Also people can join together to create armies, even empires, or just be a bunch of Mercenaries. There would be lots of planets too, overall it would be better than Eve.
K, so it's a made up word by a rapper.=NHB=Shadow wrote:
I don't know but its one of the words Lil Wayne raps aboutWar Man wrote:
^That could be oneWhat's a wisconsinan?=NHB=Shadow wrote:
why does it have to be africans? why can't it be wisconsinans?
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
So BF2?Laura wrote:
An online RTS combined with an FPS, so infantry and vehicles on the ground will be controlled via players by FPS, while the RTS'ers will see a traditional RTS game screen with resources and a general view of the FPS infantry/vehicles, with the ability to order the FPS players to certain objectives etc.
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
sadly true.Cybargs wrote:
OFP2 WAS A FUCKING GOOD GAME OK IF THEY MADE IT PROPERLY FUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKIconic Irony wrote:
Liar.Cybargs wrote:
OFP2 graphics and map size, but with classes AND CUSTOMIZED WEAPONS JESUS FUCKING CHRIST.
OFP2 was going to be perfect if they had proper fucking dedicated servers.
Nerd time. Ever daydreamed about what kind of video game you would design if you were an industry insider with millions of dollars? A few rules :
1. You have significant money/power in the video game industry
2. You have the power to micromanage everything (like an "auteur" in the film industry. See : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auteur_theory)
3. Use video games/engines/developers that already exist as a point of reference. Try using "+" and "-" to express which aspects of each you would like to incorporate or eliminate from the final product.
4. Must be reasonably feasible (this is subjective, of course)
My example : Massive Battlefield : The 2942 Effect A sci-fi third person tactical shooter/RPG. Put Bioware in control of the narrative/story, with Mass Effect's conversation system. Use the Frostbite Engine, and have DICE work on modifying/improving it to allow larger, more varied environments (like the new Need for Speed game). Also have them in control of the singleplayer action and multiplayer.
So,
Mass Effect : + story/narrative, + conversation system, + third person combat, + ME1's weapon/armor system, - crappy menu, - occasional cheesiness, - mediocre combat, - mediocre environments (lifeless people standing around doing nothing, clunky movement, small areas with little exploration and no depth)
Battlefield : + Frostbite Engine, + SATURATION AND COLOR, + vehicles, + 2142 class system, - crappy shit flying in your face all the time, - convoluted unlock system, - crappy map design
tada
1. You have significant money/power in the video game industry
2. You have the power to micromanage everything (like an "auteur" in the film industry. See : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auteur_theory)
3. Use video games/engines/developers that already exist as a point of reference. Try using "+" and "-" to express which aspects of each you would like to incorporate or eliminate from the final product.
4. Must be reasonably feasible (this is subjective, of course)
My example : Massive Battlefield : The 2942 Effect A sci-fi third person tactical shooter/RPG. Put Bioware in control of the narrative/story, with Mass Effect's conversation system. Use the Frostbite Engine, and have DICE work on modifying/improving it to allow larger, more varied environments (like the new Need for Speed game). Also have them in control of the singleplayer action and multiplayer.
So,
Mass Effect : + story/narrative, + conversation system, + third person combat, + ME1's weapon/armor system, - crappy menu, - occasional cheesiness, - mediocre combat, - mediocre environments (lifeless people standing around doing nothing, clunky movement, small areas with little exploration and no depth)
Battlefield : + Frostbite Engine, + SATURATION AND COLOR, + vehicles, + 2142 class system, - crappy shit flying in your face all the time, - convoluted unlock system, - crappy map design
tada
Total War: The Civil War
Tu Stultus Es
Do we get to whip brown people that get out of line when we're the Confederates?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
pokemon red
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Only if you get to kill unarmed Irishmen rioting because of the draft, when you are the Union.Jay wrote:
Do we get to whip brown people that get out of line when we're the Confederates?
also reported
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella