the high contrast song? I think it's proper good.Sturgeon wrote:
Heard it on their essential mix ages ago, think they only made it as a joke but it proved to be quite popular.
It's alright
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
the high contrast song? I think it's proper good.Sturgeon wrote:
Heard it on their essential mix ages ago, think they only made it as a joke but it proved to be quite popular.
It's alright
I think it would be better with the 'gurn-face' part was less crap. A bit more melodic rather than just noise would be betterSturgeon wrote:
Heard it on their essential mix ages ago, think they only made it as a joke but it proved to be quite popular.
It's alright
mehCamm wrote:
heard this on radio 1 t'other day, quite like it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiOPxn6yWRs
in fact, I fucking LOVE it
look back a page noob
Same guy is in this one..Kmar wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXO-jKks … embedded#!
dude (Marquese Scott) is a pretty sick dancer.
No you!DUnlimited wrote:
nero is outright terrible
Last edited by Towelly (2011-10-24 08:55:26)
This. Purists make me rage.Towelly wrote:
No you!DUnlimited wrote:
nero is outright terrible
I actually really do like a few tracks off their album, I remember Me & You getting played at P2 a while back and the floor went entirely mental.
It's not the kind of music that you'd give as an example of the genre to a prospective convert but fact is it does awesome things to a crowd so it gets tons of playtime. I know a lot of Dubstep/DnB purists have grown to have a problem with the whole Brostep "movement" but I just see it as an extension of what we had before. Sure we can all sit and listen to Burial late at night after a few beers in a dark bar with people that enjoy that sort of thing but if you want a big night out, you better learn to enjoy the sort of music that revolves around giant bass lines.
Last edited by PrivateVendetta (2011-10-24 09:16:58)
I know you weren't pointing this directly at me but I do pretty much agree with you, I just tend to have a problem with anyone who can't see a place for different styles of the same genre. Now and then it's actually more fun to have the kind of night out that revolves around drinking fluorescent drinks, bone shaking music and loose girls who couldn't string a sentence together if they tried. Then I'm also the kind of guy that'll happily sit in a quiet pub drinking beer (as in proper beer) with a few friends from work and then go home at 11 and fall asleep, hell I think I might enjoy that more nowadays.Uzique wrote:
clueless internet tagons like you, pv, make me "rage".
why does it have to be an 'either/or' between accepting nero and other wank, mediocre, paint-by-numbers dubstep, or being some super-elite, avant-garde, underground, "sitting in a dark bar" scenario? you do realize that the biggest nights in london and bristol, with two massive and varied scenes, have continued onwards with 'credible' dance music... just fine? without need for regress to nero and deadmau5? without even a peep of skrillex? sure, nero "gets the floor moving" if you're at a liquid/oceana/propaganda, or a shitty student union where people are only there to drink vk blue and get laid with some chick from the polo society... but there's an entire world of genuine dance music that has left this crap behind years ago. it's not an "extension" in this actual context so much as an embarrassing hangover, a throw-down scrap morsel from the table of music progression to the gurning clueless twats that exist in and frequent the many small to medium size cesspit clubs below.
fabric, fwd//, boiler room... pretty much the 3 central locations for "dubstep and drum n bass" and its "appreciation". purists make you rage? lol. the leagues of computer-humpers sitting on youtube and internet forums 24/7/365 acting like they're "into the scene" make the so-called "purists" facepalm. "a bit drum and bascist", my ass. you're a weekend warrior. jog on.
Uzique wrote:
clueless internet tagons like you, pv, make me "rage".