Tech: Open thread

2011-11-13 13:24:11

#9201

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|5951|شمال

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core Gets Detailed, launches Nov 29
...

Compared to its older brother, the GTX 560 Ti (448 Core) will come with one of the 15 streaming modules disabled, to provide a total of 448 CUDA cores.

The rest of the core includes 56 texture units, 40 ROP units and a 320-bit memory bus connected to 1.25GB of video buffer, just as is the case with the GeForce GTX 570.

The card's operating frequencies will also mimic those of its older brother as the GPU will work at 732MHz, while the GDDR5 video buffer is clocked at 950MHz (3.80GHz effective). Together with the increased performance offered by the new graphics core, the power consumption of the card has also grown since the GTX 560 Ti 448 uses the same 0.950V to 1.100V voltage range as the GTX 570.

Other features of the GTX 560 Ti (448 Core) include support for 3-way SLI, DVI, HDMI and DisplayPort video outputs. This is not the first time that Nvidia has decided to increase the shader count on one of its graphics cards as the company has also done the same with the GTX 260, which soon after its introduction received a 216 Core version.

The GTX 560 Ti 448 Cores will be officially launched on November 29 from what we heard, and its recommended price is expected to be on par with that of the original GTX 560 Ti.

http://www.guru3d.com/news/geforce-gtx- … es-nov-29/

GTX570's little bro. i think two or three of those will kick butt, jah?

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2011-11-13 14:38:08

#9202

Benzin: Member; +576|6199

The 460 kicks ass, so yea.

2011-11-13 15:21:43

#9203

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|5951|شمال

am selling two of my cards. floppy, you want one? special price for you, my friend

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2011-11-13 16:42:33

#9204

Camm: Feeding the Cats.; +761|5169|Dundee, Scotland.

finally got my new pc up and running, fresh install. feels good man.

for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.

2011-11-13 17:51:42

#9205

mikkel: Member; +383|6802

Replaced some bad capacitors in a monitor without ample ventilation. Soldering headaches are the worst headaches.

2011-11-13 20:37:14

#9206

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6612|'Murka

So...

I installed the new RAM. No problem. Well, a little bit of a problem. Had to remove my video card, install my RAM, then reinstall my video card. It was blocking the retaining clips from moving.

Anyway...system booted just fine. Checked that it was reading 8GB of RAM. No problem. Started BF3. Map loaded quite a bit faster, as desired. Awesome. Spawned in...and character was uncontrollable. WTF?

Hit ESC. Mouse was all over the screen. Hit ALT+TAB. Mouse is back under control. Shit only goes wonky in game. Tried a different server. Same problem.

Any ideas?

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

2011-11-13 20:44:49

#9207

jsnipy: ...; +3,276|6723|...

you dont use the actual mouse software do you?

2011-11-13 21:09:18

#9208

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,053|6972|PNW

mikkel wrote:
Replaced some bad capacitors in a monitor without ample ventilation. Soldering headaches are the worst headaches.

Dude. Ventilation. Get some.

Trust me, don't suck that shit down for a hobby.

2011-11-13 21:26:51

#9209

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6612|'Murka

jsnipy wrote:
you dont use the actual mouse software do you?

What do you mean?

I have the MS drivers installed. I use a MS Sidewinder mouse.

E: nvm. Mucked with the mouse settings in game and got it straightened out. Makes no sense why they would have changed all of a sudden...

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

2011-11-14 08:17:21

#9210

Camm: Feeding the Cats.; +761|5169|Dundee, Scotland.

next on the buy list: ssd. not till the new year though

for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.

2011-11-14 08:36:20

#9211

Camm: Feeding the Cats.; +761|5169|Dundee, Scotland.

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6151173/temps.PNG

stock cooler, noice

for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.

2011-11-14 08:52:44

#9212

Camm: Feeding the Cats.; +761|5169|Dundee, Scotland.

i'm thinking if I throw a decent hsf on it, i'll get it to 3.6 easy, with good temps

for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.

2011-11-14 10:16:39

#9213

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|5951|شمال

Intel Core i7-3960X Review: Sandy Bridge-E And X79 Express

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2011-11-14 13:31:47

#9214

Little BaBy JESUS: m8; +394|6349|'straya

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/bat … 063-8.html

"In fact, the Radeon HD 6970 achieves a better result at 2560x1600 (and the other two resolutions) than the GeForce GTX 580!"

2011-11-14 13:53:13

#9215

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|5951|شمال

wtf, even the 6950 gets more fps than the gtx 580

am adding this ss to my gpu ad

<3

Last edited by Beduin (2011-11-14 13:59:04)

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2011-11-14 14:14:01

#9216

Bertster7: Confused Pothead; +1,101|6782|SE London

Beduin wrote:
wtf, even the 6950 gets more fps than the gtx 580

am adding this ss to my gpu ad

<3

Ultra quality on one test and high on the other? Not exactly like for like is it.

2011-11-14 14:16:39

#9217

SonderKommando: Eat, Lift, Grow, Repeat....; +564|6860|The darkside of Denver

yea the 580 gets 68 or so on high settings. I average around 70fps on my setup on all high.

Last edited by SonderKommando (2011-11-14 14:16:53)

2011-11-14 14:43:34

#9218

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|5951|شمال

Bertster7 wrote:
Beduin wrote:
wtf, even the 6950 gets more fps than the gtx 580

am adding this ss to my gpu ad

<3
Ultra quality on one test and high on the other? Not exactly like for like is it.

jah ok, not fair?

is that worth the price for a gtx 580? that was my point.. but again, it has to be fair

also SLI vs CF

here is ultra btw

15 fps!

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2011-11-14 18:26:59

#9219

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6612|'Murka

What I noticed was the difference in performance hit you take between the two when you go from HIGH to ULTRA settings. It seems to be more marked in the Radeon than in the GeForce.

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

2011-11-14 23:07:13

#9220

Benzin: Member; +576|6199

FEOS wrote:
What I noticed was the difference in performance hit you take between the two when you go from HIGH to ULTRA settings. It seems to be more marked in the Radeon than in the GeForce.

I honestly can't see the difference too much between the two settings...

2011-11-15 00:07:32

#9221

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|5951|شمال

.. then again. All the tests where radeon dominates, the MSAA is disabled. Enable it, and see radeons 'collapse'.

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2011-11-15 01:29:47

#9222

Little BaBy JESUS: m8; +394|6349|'straya

Yeah I just use post AA rather than MSAA, takes way too much of a toll on performance to be worth it.

2011-11-15 03:34:15

#9223

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6612|'Murka

CapnNismo wrote:
FEOS wrote:
What I noticed was the difference in performance hit you take between the two when you go from HIGH to ULTRA settings. It seems to be more marked in the Radeon than in the GeForce.
I honestly can't see the difference too much between the two settings...

Radeon: High - 61.44
Ultra - 39.99
-------
21.45

GeForce: High - 68.96
Ultra - 55.50
------
13.46

Granted, it's only 8 fps, but it still seems significant to me...

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

2011-11-15 03:43:28

#9224

Little BaBy JESUS: m8; +394|6349|'straya

Not sure why people are comparing the HD6950 and the GTX580. The GTX580 is twice the price of the 6950. The 6970 (which is still ~$150 cheaper than the 580) performs better at all 3 resolutions at high quality. (Although admittedly the 6970 falls back behind the 580 on ultra settings).

That was what I was happy about since I own a HD6970, and play at high settings.

2011-11-15 08:12:24

#9225

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5989|Catherine Black

Eighteen minutes on the phone to tell mother how to open a PDF file. Holy shit.

BF2S Forums Tech: Open thread

mikkel wrote:

jsnipy wrote:

Beduin wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Beduin wrote:

FEOS wrote:

CapnNismo wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Board footer