tazz.
oz.
+1,338|6395|Sydney | ♥

Finray wrote:

Okay I can see the Macbook from my Windows 7 PC, but can't see the Win7 from Mac. I thought this was just supposed to work?
Go to finder Apple+K

Put in smb://ip_or_name
then login and select the share.
everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously.
mtb0minime
minimember
+2,418|6875

Gonna reformat this weekend, my comp is a bit overdue for one. I've backed up my user folder, anything else important I might miss?
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6507|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

mtb0minime wrote:

Gonna reformat this weekend, my comp is a bit overdue for one. I've backed up my user folder, anything else important I might miss?
savegames not stored in user folder
firefox settings folder (if you use FF)
games you "aquired" via LAN meaning you don't have the ISO or similar...
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
mtb0minime
minimember
+2,418|6875

FloppY_ wrote:

mtb0minime wrote:

Gonna reformat this weekend, my comp is a bit overdue for one. I've backed up my user folder, anything else important I might miss?
savegames not stored in user folder
firefox settings folder (if you use FF)
games you "aquired" via LAN meaning you don't have the ISO or similar...
-done
-I don't change much so I'll just redo it when I reinstall
-don't have any
mtb0minime
minimember
+2,418|6875

I'm sure many of you tech regulars have heard of this site, but for any lurkers out there who don't post much in this section: http://ninite.com/ is amazing when doing a reformat.

Can't believe I haven't seen it before.
Tdog2007
Giggity Giggity
+25|6934|US
Odd ?, but what is the difference between the retail windows 7 software and the win7 for system builders? Is it the same, just without a manual and the pretty box?
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6507|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Tdog2007 wrote:

Odd ?, but what is the difference between the retail windows 7 software and the win7 for system builders? Is it the same, just without a manual and the pretty box?
Yeah as far as I know you just get the disc in a paper-sleve rather than the fine and dandy retail box...
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6718

Tdog2007 wrote:

Odd ?, but what is the difference between the retail windows 7 software and the win7 for system builders? Is it the same, just without a manual and the pretty box?
windows 7 ultimate has the same features as windows 7 enterprise. the only difference is enterprise can be volume licensed.

https://img28.imageshack.us/img28/4989/win7versions.jpg
Tdog2007
Giggity Giggity
+25|6934|US

burnzz wrote:

windows 7 ultimate has the same features as windows 7 enterprise. the only difference is enterprise can be volume licensed.

http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/4989/win7versions.jpg
That's not what I meant. I mean is there a diff between, say, win7 home retail and win7 home for system builders. As in, is it only good for a certain time, features shut off over time, etc.

FloppY_ wrote:

Yeah as far as I know you just get the disc in a paper-sleve rather than the fine and dandy retail box...
thanks for the input. I'll wait for some more input on the matter because I'd love to only spend $100 on the OEM one instead of $200 (or w/e) for retail

Last edited by Tdog2007 (2010-06-19 13:13:44)

presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6182|Places 'n such

Tdog2007 wrote:

burnzz wrote:

windows 7 ultimate has the same features as windows 7 enterprise. the only difference is enterprise can be volume licensed.

http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/4989/win7versions.jpg
That's not what I meant. I mean is there a diff between, say, win7 home retail and win7 home for system builders. As in, is it only good for a certain time, features shut off over time, etc.

FloppY_ wrote:

Yeah as far as I know you just get the disc in a paper-sleve rather than the fine and dandy retail box...
thanks for the input. I'll wait for some more input on the matter because I'd love to only spend $100 on the OEM one instead of $200 (or w/e) for retail
Difference between OEM and retail is you can uninstall retail from one pc and put it onto another, OEM is a one use thing (not including formatting and repairing)
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
Tdog2007
Giggity Giggity
+25|6934|US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … -_-Product
There's a review (1st one for me right on that page) saying that if you change mobos to just call the 800 # and get it reset/switched/whatever.

True/False?
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6507|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Tdog2007 wrote:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832116754&cm_re=windows_7-_-32-116-754-_-Product
There's a review (1st one for me right on that page) saying that if you change mobos to just call the 800 # and get it reset/switched/whatever.

True/False?
True from what I have heard...

Just don't tell them that you "upgraded" your motherboard.. say the old one broke and you replaced it

Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-06-19 14:12:40)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Tdog2007
Giggity Giggity
+25|6934|US
well actually windows 7 home prem is only $150 so that's no too bad (and don't have to fight with the OEM), so don't need any more replies to my question.

karma time!
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6009|Catherine Black
Just download it.

/query
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
FFLink
There is.
+1,380|6912|Devon, England

FloppY_ wrote:

Tdog2007 wrote:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832116754&cm_re=windows_7-_-32-116-754-_-Product
There's a review (1st one for me right on that page) saying that if you change mobos to just call the 800 # and get it reset/switched/whatever.

True/False?
True from what I have heard...

Just don't tell them that you "upgraded" your motherboard.. say the old one broke and you replaced it
True, I had to swap out my motherboard as of a fault and when I called them up, they were fine.
Lucien
Fantasma Parastasie
+1,451|6874
Not available for Firefox 3.0.1;MEGAUPLOAD
I am not using Firefox 3.0.1;MEGAUPLOAD, that doesnt even exist, what the fuck

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5389629/crazyshit.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/HTmoH.jpg
Computer_Guy
Member
+54|6918
What do you guys think of the Sony NEX camera series? Does it compare with todays DSLRs?

https://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01660/sony-nex-5_1660008c.jpg
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6507|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Computer_Guy wrote:

What do you guys think of the Sony NEX camera series? Does it compare with todays DSLRs?

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/mult … 60008c.jpg
I don't know the specs but it looks like a standard compact pocket cam with a lens attached tbh...
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Wallpaper
+303|6215|The pool
Theyre a definite step up from point and shoots because it has a larger sensor, which also makes bokeh possible (though, not a whole lot). NEX and similar cameras are slower than SLRs, much more limited in respect to lenses, poorer battery life and less expandability. Theyre great for some who just want a little more than a camera for snaps, but I dont think they are really worth it. Not to mention they are harder to DIY mod for various purposes

If youre worried about size, theyre good. Or if you dont mind a bit of extra bulk, a low level DSLR with a 50mm slapped on it wouldnt be bad either

EDIT: DO WANT, but I feel guilty spending so much on photography in the last month http://www.mpex.com/browse.cfm/4,14648.html

Last edited by Wallpaper (2010-06-22 01:06:08)

FloppY_
­
+1,010|6507|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Wallpaper wrote:

Theyre a definite step up from point and shoots because it has a larger sensor, which also makes bokeh possible (though, not a whole lot). NEX and similar cameras are slower than SLRs, much more limited in respect to lenses, poorer battery life and less expandability. Theyre great for some who just want a little more than a camera for snaps, but I dont think they are really worth it. Not to mention they are harder to DIY mod for various purposes

If youre worried about size, theyre good. Or if you dont mind a bit of extra bulk, a low level DSLR with a 50mm slapped on it wouldnt be bad either

EDIT: DO WANT, but I feel guilty spending so much on photography in the last month http://www.mpex.com/browse.cfm/4,14648.html
I think it's similar to my Z5
https://www.livingroom.org.au/photolog/Konica-Minolta-Dimage-z5-1.jpg
Somewhere between DSLR and PocketCam
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Wallpaper
+303|6215|The pool
EVIL (stupid acronym) and 4/3rds cameras have bigger sensors as compared to the one you posted. Z5 and similar cameras use a P&S sensor; 5.75 x 4.31 mm. 4/3rds cameras use much larger sensors, ~18.0 x 13.5 mm
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6507|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Wallpaper wrote:

EVIL (stupid acronym) and 4/3rds cameras have bigger sensors as compared to the one you posted. Z5 and similar cameras use a P&S sensor; 5.75 x 4.31 mm. 4/3rds cameras use much larger sensors, ~18.0 x 13.5 mm
I have absolutely no idea what that meant, but ok...

Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-06-22 01:33:57)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Wallpaper
+303|6215|The pool
tl;dr  this

https://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01660/sony-nex-5_1660008c.jpg

has a much bigger/better sensor than this

https://www.livingroom.org.au/photolog/Konica-Minolta-Dimage-z5-1.jpg
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|6942|Sydney, Australia

Wallpaper wrote:

Theyre a definite step up from point and shoots because it has a larger sensor, which also makes bokeh possible (though, not a whole lot). NEX and similar cameras are slower than SLRs, much more limited in respect to lenses, poorer battery life and less expandability. Theyre great for some who just want a little more than a camera for snaps, but I dont think they are really worth it. Not to mention they are harder to DIY mod for various purposes

If youre worried about size, theyre good. Or if you dont mind a bit of extra bulk, a low level DSLR with a 50mm slapped on it wouldnt be bad either

EDIT: DO WANT, but I feel guilty spending so much on photography in the last month http://www.mpex.com/browse.cfm/4,14648.html
Just to nitpick, because it's photography. Bokeh is the "quality" of the out of focus blur. It's usually described in rather qualitative terms. eg "That Canon 85L produces rather creamy bokeh, as you'd expect for a lens that costs 2,500 bucks". There is a correlation with bokeh and the type of aperture in the lens (among other things) - a lens with a circular aperture will produce bokeh that looks a lot better than bokeh made by a cheap lens with 5 aperture blades.

But you have the right idea. Since there is a larger sensor, you will have less depth of field.. and thus out of focus areas will be "more" blurry.
Wallpaper
+303|6215|The pool
I have been nerd shamed

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard