what?ATG wrote:
Clearly these guys are in a league with Led Zepplin, The Carpenters and Pink Floyd.

what?ATG wrote:
Clearly these guys are in a league with Led Zepplin, The Carpenters and Pink Floyd.
Jenspm wrote:
lol.ATG wrote:
I'm a musician so I know.
If I don't think of this thread and ATG's opinions of green day (No, I won't fucking capitalize the name!) as sarcasm, then I risk serious physical harm. It's just a mental safety thing.Bevo wrote:
@ Defiance: He's made a thread about greenday before and their efforts (or someone else did and he posted in it), so I don't really think he's sarcastic at all. Perhaps we're all getting trolled.
Last edited by Defiance (2009-08-26 14:38:27)
sellout. i thought of it as mainstreaming - no difference. after superhits didn't matter anyways.Bevo wrote:
They're terrible and pretty much the definition of sellout.
Look at the change from Dookie --> American Idiot.
Wwwwwwwwwwwhat?!?!? but....wait..mehhhh.. thanks ATG, you just gave me an aneurysm. I'm glad you enjoyed yourself but I think you had too much "jazz" in your cigarette. Oh and the Carpenters?? ffs man.ATG wrote:
Clearly these guys are in a league with Led Zepplin, The Carpenters and Pink Floyd.
Yeah, Green Day were fun when they made harmless pop-punk (see the '90s)...then when they all started wearing makeup and trying to be political, it all went downhill...SirSchloppy wrote:
Hmm, their recent albums, American Idiot, and the new one, are a load of drivel.
Give me Dookie and Kerplunk any day.
I'm fed up of their political moaning.
Red Forman wrote:
roflATG wrote:
Clearly these guys are in a league with Led Zepplin, The Carpenters and Pink Floyd.
Superior Mind wrote:
I used to like Green Day. Then they stared using eye liner and wearing ties.
Last edited by Ryan (2009-08-26 15:19:28)
Red Forman wrote:
roflATG wrote:
Clearly these guys are in a league with Led Zepplin, The Carpenters and Pink Floyd.
It's not the "I was first" thing, it's the "they were good, then they gained popularity and turned to shit" thing. See Rise Against. See Black Eyed Peas.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
There's nothing inherently wrong with "selling out". That's a pretty tired phrase that makes it seem like bands aren't allowed to go after big bucks and a larger audience. It's rather elitist to think that since you heard a band before someone else did, or when they were "underground" that it gives you some sort of superior advantage or that the band should stay with that small group of fans.
There's a difference between "selling out" and watering/dumbing down your act/style to cater to a wider audience or because a record executive told you that's how to get signed and/or make a lot of money.
I was probably around 13, so take it with a grain of salt.Uzique wrote:
I'm sorry, but the only time Black Eyed Peas were ever good was when Fergie was a 17 year old meth-addict and Will.i.am was never making music.
Last edited by Bevo (2009-08-26 17:12:51)
So all musicians share your point of view on LZ?ATG wrote:
Oh noes, I am dead serious.
And, Carpenters>Zeplin.
I'm a musician so I know. Zeplins is overrated garbage.
Haha whatever. I remember when they were on Lookout! Records (same label as Op Ivy) back in the day...they were still not that great. I liked Dookie because it was a catchy album and I was 13, but it doesn't make it good music. It's more likely that you heard them first when your music taste wasn't as refined as it is now and that album has a certain air of nostalgia for you. It's the same for me when I hear Carousel by Blink182 - shitty shitty band, but I remember listening to Cheshire Cat when I was 14 and I thought I was so badass because I listened to this wannabe punk band that no one had heard of.Bevo wrote:
It's not the "I was first" thing, it's the "they were good, then they gained popularity and turned to shit" thing. See Rise Against. See Black Eyed Peas.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
There's nothing inherently wrong with "selling out". That's a pretty tired phrase that makes it seem like bands aren't allowed to go after big bucks and a larger audience. It's rather elitist to think that since you heard a band before someone else did, or when they were "underground" that it gives you some sort of superior advantage or that the band should stay with that small group of fans.
There's a difference between "selling out" and watering/dumbing down your act/style to cater to a wider audience or because a record executive told you that's how to get signed and/or make a lot of money.
That's probably part of the disparity, but they lost their punk roots. They became more moderate, like you said trying to appeal to a larger audience.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Haha whatever. I remember when they were on Lookout! Records (same label as Op Ivy) back in the day...they were still not that great. I liked Dookie because it was a catchy album and I was 13, but it doesn't make it good music. It's more likely that you heard them first when your music taste wasn't as refined as it is now and that album has a certain air of nostalgia for you. It's the same for me when I hear Carousel by Blink182 - shitty shitty band, but I remember listening to Cheshire Cat when I was 14 and I thought I was so badass because I listened to this wannabe punk band that no one had heard of.