BF2S Forums U.S. military threatens Afghan village.

Gooners wrote:

twoblacklines wrote:

why cant they just drop a load of 2000lb bombs on every village. war won, job jobbed. After all it seems perfectly fair for them to kill US civillians, and in fact in 9/11 only civillians were targeted by bin laden, no military personel.

and what makes you better than all the terrorists out there?

also he is forgetting the inconvenient fact that almost all the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia...

Red Forman wrote:

destruktion_6143 wrote:

Gooners wrote:

and what makes you better than all the terrorists out there?

also he is forgetting the inconvenient fact that almost all the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia...

what the hell does that have to do with the OP?

Did you read my post? lol,

twoblacklines wrote:

why cant they just drop a load of 2000lb bombs on every village. war won, job jobbed. After all it seems perfectly fair for them to kill US civilians, and in fact in 9/11 only civillians were targeted by bin laden, no military personel.

Red Forman wrote:

destruktion_6143 wrote:

Gooners wrote:

and what makes you better than all the terrorists out there?

also he is forgetting the inconvenient fact that almost all the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia...

what the hell does that have to do with the OP?

Because he's asking for the death of all Afghans, despite the fact that all the hijackers and Bin Laden himself are Saudi Arabs. I'm guessing that's what it has to do with his post.

Not that hard to work out...

Why don't you explain what you mean by "What does it have to do with the OP" because I'm trying to figure out what you mean

Last edited by Mekstizzle (2009-08-18 11:03:55)

Red Forman wrote:

Ya I saw what he wrote.  Question still stands.

Mekstizzle wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

Ya I saw what he wrote.  Question still stands.

I don't get you and that other guy isn't getting you either, explain it more

because now you towels will start going on aboot 9/11 and such.

I was just responding to twoblacklines ridiculous comment.

I also resent the fact you called me a "towel"
Racism ftw...

Beduin wrote:

ATG wrote:

Leaflets should be saying;
"...kindly gtfo or die ".

No. We need to gtfo.
I am afraid that this attitude will lead to a situation worse than Vietnam.

You should have stayed in Vietnam,..

I'd never been born if you did, but still, you should have stayed.

Spark wrote:

twoblacklines wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

So you would be fine about killing 32,000,000 innocent people?

Sometimes you have to do bad things to do good things.

I'm sure Hitler, Stalin and Mao said the same thing.

lmao, "good things" are in the eye of the beholder.

You've been qualified in IED construction and working in the IED field for 15 years?

No, I've been in designing, sourcing and manufacturing products, IEDs don't seem much different.

The point is someone elses 'experience' is not invalid  just because you say it is.

Dilbert_X wrote:

You've been qualified in IED construction and working in the IED field for 15 years?

No, I've been in designing, sourcing and manufacturing products, IEDs don't seem much different.

And this is based on your experience with IEDs?

Oh, wait. You don't have any of that. You're making a comparison from an uninformed position but expecting people to accept it as incontrovertible.

That wouldn't be right, now would it?

Dilbert_X wrote:

The point is someone elses 'experience' is not invalid  just because you say it is.

It is if it doesn't involve the topic under discussion.

Oh, wait. You don't have any of that. You're making a comparison from an uninformed position but expecting people to accept it as incontrovertible.

Doesn't really matter that I have direct experience or not, neither do you.

It is if it doesn't involve the topic under discussion.

If you make logical leaps based on something you know little about, based on briefing docs which may or may not be accurate (and US intel is remarkably poor these days) you're free to do so. I'm just pointing out some alternative views and providing other information you're apparently lacking.

MOAB wrote:

Actually that's the stuff the media picks up and than tars the entire intelligence system with. You have no idea how effective intelligence gathered is, whether its by the US or any other country. Guess its one of those cases that because you can't see it, it doesn't exist, right?

Well the WMD thing was a bit of a facepalm TBH, not sure how they could have got it more wrong.
Some of the stuff FEOS comes out with, supposedly on the basis of up to the minute intel and crack analysis, is just plain wrong.