It would be nice if it worked that way, but it doesn't.Dilbert_X wrote:
I'd argue the converse, it keeps lots of Police officers employed who are then available to deal with major events when they happen.Turquoise wrote:
Maintaining current bans only ensures a large portion of law enforcement resources go toward drug issues rather than murders or rapes.
Rapes and murders get dealt with.
http://war-on-drugs.suite101.com/articl … r_on_drugs
http://www.drugsense.org/wodclock.htm
http://www.drugpolicy.org/library/facts … onomic.cfm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_Drugs
Heroin used to be legal. Cocaine also was at one point. If you tax and regulate substances properly, they result in far lower net costs to society than the ones incurred by organized crime.Dilbert_X wrote:
Which brings us back to the 'legalise everything' argument, heroin, LSD, crack, crystal meth.Banning more substances only creates more illegal markets. See Prohibition.