Pages: 1 … 484 485 486 487 488 … 683
niche opinion? i played cod1 from release. i played cod2 from release. i played cod4 from release. i played the first two professionally and cod4 for high-level teams and also as a casual pub slacker. my opinion is niche? sounds to me like i'm the guy that has played all of the games, been incredibly involved in the community, and has watched the games rise and decline over time. what's your opinion again? not niche? i guess to be the 'normal' mainstream opinion you have to have never played cod1/cod2, like you, right? you know best, huh? rofl. you crack me up.Roc18 wrote:
No, that's your opinion. The game sold more for a reason. I'm not going to get in to a herp derp COD 2 is better than COD 4 argument. If you ask most fans of the COD franchise they will say COD 4 is the peak in popularity and quality. You have your niche opinion about which one was best.Uzique wrote:
nope, you're still wrong. on console maybe, but that's because cod4 was the first major cod-franchise console game (herp derp lets not count 3). so of course in terms of raw numbers, it had more players. did you play cod1? cod2? were you a part of the pc gaming community? did you follow any of the professional fps scenes back then? i know the answer to all those questions is "no".Roc18 wrote:
There's no denying that COD4 Modern Warfare was when the Call of Duty series took off in popularity.
fyi even when cod4 was in its pc gaming prime, call of duty 2 still had as many active servers/players. it kept a huge active community for many, many years after the game was officially 'abandoned' by the devs.
also lol at calling cod1 and cod2 "ww2 rehashes". they were the best ww2 fps games ever done, period. you clearly didn't play them. stop talking about stuff you know nothing about. you didn't experience it, so stop make statements as if you have the knowledge or qualification to do so. mong.
Last edited by Uzique (2011-12-16 07:47:59)
So to you the Peak was COD 2 ok then.Uzique wrote:
niche opinion? i played cod1 from release. i played cod2 from release. i played cod4 from release. i played the first two professionally and cod4 for high-level teams and also as a casual pub slacker. my opinion is niche? sounds to me like i'm the guy that has played all of the games, been incredibly involved in the community, and has watched the games rise and decline over time. what's your opinion again? not niche? i guess to be the 'normal' mainstream opinion you have to have never played cod1/cod2, like you, right? you know best, huh? rofl. you crack me up.Roc18 wrote:
No, that's your opinion. The game sold more for a reason. I'm not going to get in to a herp derp COD 2 is better than COD 4 argument. If you ask most fans of the COD franchise they will say COD 4 is the peak in popularity and quality. You have your niche opinion about which one was best.Uzique wrote:
nope, you're still wrong. on console maybe, but that's because cod4 was the first major cod-franchise console game (herp derp lets not count 3). so of course in terms of raw numbers, it had more players. did you play cod1? cod2? were you a part of the pc gaming community? did you follow any of the professional fps scenes back then? i know the answer to all those questions is "no".
fyi even when cod4 was in its pc gaming prime, call of duty 2 still had as many active servers/players. it kept a huge active community for many, many years after the game was officially 'abandoned' by the devs.
also lol at calling cod1 and cod2 "ww2 rehashes". they were the best ww2 fps games ever done, period. you clearly didn't play them. stop talking about stuff you know nothing about. you didn't experience it, so stop make statements as if you have the knowledge or qualification to do so. mong.
it's obvious that "if you ask most fans of the cod franchise" they will say cod4 because they're YOUR AGE and only STARTED PLAYING COD AT COD4. does that mean cod1 and cod2 are consigned to oblivion? and weren't the best games in the series? because you were too busy sucking on ya mum's titties to be playing it? typical roc "i'm the fps pro" attitude. dude, you didn't play. these games are like 10 years old now. you have no knowledge or experience of what you're talking about. saying that the sales figures are higher or saying "most cod players will name cod4" means nothing. cod and its playerbase have changed beyond recognition in the last 5 years - going from hardcore pc community to casual, prestige-unlocking, gibbering xbox live generation retards. doing a poll on cod today is pretty pointless because most cod gamers are aged 13-18 and thus most of them were age 5 when the game was REALLY having its pc gaming hey-day. you missed it. big deal. now stop being a fucking retard and acting as if you know best.
now you know i'm talking common sense but you'll still argue back and deny because you're stubborn and won't admit you're plain wrong. when you have literally nil experience or clue of what you're talking about. this makes you look incredibly silly.
nope, as i keep saying, the peak was cod1. but it is so old now that obviously i can't link you to a web-page saying "look, here's still loads of players actually actively playing cod1 right now" to prove you wrong beyond refute. but just because you can't see it now, in 2011, does that mean it never happened? cod1 kept a solid second-place behind world of warcraft throughout the entire last decade. it was an absolutely huge game. you were too young, it's as simple as that. stop arguing when everyone can see you are plainly wrong.Roc18 wrote:
So to you the Peak was COD 2 ok then.Uzique wrote:
niche opinion? i played cod1 from release. i played cod2 from release. i played cod4 from release. i played the first two professionally and cod4 for high-level teams and also as a casual pub slacker. my opinion is niche? sounds to me like i'm the guy that has played all of the games, been incredibly involved in the community, and has watched the games rise and decline over time. what's your opinion again? not niche? i guess to be the 'normal' mainstream opinion you have to have never played cod1/cod2, like you, right? you know best, huh? rofl. you crack me up.Roc18 wrote:
No, that's your opinion. The game sold more for a reason. I'm not going to get in to a herp derp COD 2 is better than COD 4 argument. If you ask most fans of the COD franchise they will say COD 4 is the peak in popularity and quality. You have your niche opinion about which one was best.
it's obvious that "if you ask most fans of the cod franchise" they will say cod4 because they're YOUR AGE and only STARTED PLAYING COD AT COD4. does that mean cod1 and cod2 are consigned to oblivion? and weren't the best games in the series? because you were too busy sucking on ya mum's titties to be playing it? typical roc "i'm the fps pro" attitude. dude, you didn't play. these games are like 10 years old now. you have no knowledge or experience of what you're talking about. saying that the sales figures are higher or saying "most cod players will name cod4" means nothing. cod and its playerbase have changed beyond recognition in the last 5 years - going from hardcore pc community to casual, prestige-unlocking, gibbering xbox live generation retards. doing a poll on cod today is pretty pointless because most cod gamers are aged 13-18 and thus most of them were age 5 when the game was REALLY having its pc gaming hey-day. you missed it. big deal. now stop being a fucking retard and acting as if you know best.
now you know i'm talking common sense but you'll still argue back and deny because you're stubborn and won't admit you're plain wrong. when you have literally nil experience or clue of what you're talking about. this makes you look incredibly silly.
I don't even feel like responding your crap half the time. I said from the start I didn't want to argue which was better.Uzique wrote:
yeah. you could almost map roc's retard blipster posting to a schema:
'post a clueless comment hoping it'll convince or impress people that don't know anything -> get called out by someone that does -> argue weakly and pathetically for 5 posts, until all backtracks and ripostes are exhausted -> load photobucket album -> post a 4chan image -> leave'
/golfclap
because you don't have an argument. your basis is "ask an average 17 year old cod gamer nowadays which is more popular: the game that came out when he first got his xbox360, or the games that were out when he was learning to walk". incredible thinking. you're just plain wrong. it's nothing but hilarious arrogance to suggest you know best about something you didn't even play/experience. i was massively involved in the cod euro community. even in person, going to LAN's. i was there, playing, when the games were at their most popular. yet my opinion is "niche"? lmao. is there even a 4chan image that expresses how dumb you sound?Roc18 wrote:
I don't even feel like responding your crap half the time. I said from the start I didn't want to argue which was better.Uzique wrote:
yeah. you could almost map roc's retard blipster posting to a schema:
'post a clueless comment hoping it'll convince or impress people that don't know anything -> get called out by someone that does -> argue weakly and pathetically for 5 posts, until all backtracks and ripostes are exhausted -> load photobucket album -> post a 4chan image -> leave'
/golfclap
I'm at work right now.gurdeep wrote:
anyone up for a round to start the day off?
We must not forget Medal of Honor : Allied Assault and the role it played in helping to create what would become the "Call of Duty" experience. And if I recall correctly, CoD2 was when it really took of, because of its popularity on the console. But this was, of course, why it sucked so bad on the PC, it was a step back (which in many ways seems to mirror the BF2 -> BF3 transition).Uzique wrote:
also lol at calling cod1 and cod2 "ww2 rehashes". they were the best ww2 fps games ever done, period. you clearly didn't play them. stop talking about stuff you know nothing about. you didn't experience it, so stop make statements as if you have the knowledge or qualification to do so. cod1 DID "make the series", because it was one of the first team-based shooters to ever have a major, mainstream competitive scene. cod1 was massive. you just don't know what you're talking about. mong.
Last edited by Spearhead (2011-12-16 09:25:15)
Last edited by Uzique (2011-12-16 09:29:34)
http://www.game-monitor.com/search.php?game=codUzique wrote:
nope, as i keep saying, the peak was cod1. but it is so old now that obviously i can't link you to a web-page saying "look, here's still loads of players actually actively playing cod1 right now" to prove you wrong beyond refute. but just because you can't see it now, in 2011, does that mean it never happened? cod1 kept a solid second-place behind world of warcraft throughout the entire last decade. it was an absolutely huge game. you were too young, it's as simple as that. stop arguing when everyone can see you are plainly wrong.Roc18 wrote:
So to you the Peak was COD 2 ok then.Uzique wrote:
niche opinion? i played cod1 from release. i played cod2 from release. i played cod4 from release. i played the first two professionally and cod4 for high-level teams and also as a casual pub slacker. my opinion is niche? sounds to me like i'm the guy that has played all of the games, been incredibly involved in the community, and has watched the games rise and decline over time. what's your opinion again? not niche? i guess to be the 'normal' mainstream opinion you have to have never played cod1/cod2, like you, right? you know best, huh? rofl. you crack me up.
it's obvious that "if you ask most fans of the cod franchise" they will say cod4 because they're YOUR AGE and only STARTED PLAYING COD AT COD4. does that mean cod1 and cod2 are consigned to oblivion? and weren't the best games in the series? because you were too busy sucking on ya mum's titties to be playing it? typical roc "i'm the fps pro" attitude. dude, you didn't play. these games are like 10 years old now. you have no knowledge or experience of what you're talking about. saying that the sales figures are higher or saying "most cod players will name cod4" means nothing. cod and its playerbase have changed beyond recognition in the last 5 years - going from hardcore pc community to casual, prestige-unlocking, gibbering xbox live generation retards. doing a poll on cod today is pretty pointless because most cod gamers are aged 13-18 and thus most of them were age 5 when the game was REALLY having its pc gaming hey-day. you missed it. big deal. now stop being a fucking retard and acting as if you know best.
now you know i'm talking common sense but you'll still argue back and deny because you're stubborn and won't admit you're plain wrong. when you have literally nil experience or clue of what you're talking about. this makes you look incredibly silly.
MOH:AA was a superior game anyway.Jimbob23 wrote:
http://www.game-monitor.com/search.php?game=codUzique wrote:
nope, as i keep saying, the peak was cod1. but it is so old now that obviously i can't link you to a web-page saying "look, here's still loads of players actually actively playing cod1 right now" to prove you wrong beyond refute. but just because you can't see it now, in 2011, does that mean it never happened? cod1 kept a solid second-place behind world of warcraft throughout the entire last decade. it was an absolutely huge game. you were too young, it's as simple as that. stop arguing when everyone can see you are plainly wrong.Roc18 wrote:
So to you the Peak was COD 2 ok then.
it wasn't, though, was it? almost every moh:aa team except the neckbeard public-server communities crossed over to cod1. it was superior in every single way for any game experience above running around in a pub like a headless chicken. cod1 outclassed moh:aa in every regard for competitive gaming.The A W S M F O X wrote:
MOH:AA was a superior game anyway.Jimbob23 wrote:
http://www.game-monitor.com/search.php?game=codUzique wrote:
nope, as i keep saying, the peak was cod1. but it is so old now that obviously i can't link you to a web-page saying "look, here's still loads of players actually actively playing cod1 right now" to prove you wrong beyond refute. but just because you can't see it now, in 2011, does that mean it never happened? cod1 kept a solid second-place behind world of warcraft throughout the entire last decade. it was an absolutely huge game. you were too young, it's as simple as that. stop arguing when everyone can see you are plainly wrong.
United offensive was the best imo.The A W S M F O X wrote:
MOH:AA was a superior game anyway.Jimbob23 wrote:
http://www.game-monitor.com/search.php?game=codUzique wrote:
nope, as i keep saying, the peak was cod1. but it is so old now that obviously i can't link you to a web-page saying "look, here's still loads of players actually actively playing cod1 right now" to prove you wrong beyond refute. but just because you can't see it now, in 2011, does that mean it never happened? cod1 kept a solid second-place behind world of warcraft throughout the entire last decade. it was an absolutely huge game. you were too young, it's as simple as that. stop arguing when everyone can see you are plainly wrong.
Pages: 1 … 484 485 486 487 488 … 683
