specialistx2324
hahahahahhaa
+244|6933|arica harbour
wow its about damn time DICE comes out with battlefield 3. since i am a console and former pc gamer, i would definately play this on the PC. havent been impressed on battlefield on consoles lately. looks like its about that time to ditch the Call of Duty games FOR GOOD. bye bye gayarch, bye bye finite wad of cash..

but if you believe me or not. i dont care what people say about me here anymore
m3thod
All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz
+2,197|6916|UK

Zukabazuka wrote:

Lucien wrote:

Zukabazuka wrote:

And god hope we have more than 4 AA turrets on the map and they should be damn useful this time.
wrooooong attitude. So some guy has to practice 100+ hours to be able to fly well and you get to beat him by looking in his general direction and firing when it goes beep? AA should take skill to use, or else you're going to make anything that flies utterly useless.
100h? Think you got the hang of the plane after 25h, how hard was it to bomb a flag with those nukes they have? Why more AA? Because in BF2 you had close to ZERO defense against Jets unless you decided to go dogfighting yourself. But then it seems that those with joystick would dominate anyone.

Once the dude know how to fly he is a god among the players, rarely shot down and only enemy is another jet but it felt like they did some kind of pact where neither would attack each other and they would just bomb each other team. A good chopper pilot still had to lookout for jeeps and ground turrets that could damage them. A good back attack could take them out easy. But doing that on a jet not gonna happen. Any map with jets became a flight simulator for those pilots.

If the AA wasn't stationary it wouldn't be such a big problem or if we had some AA launcher it would have been better. But the moment you had lock on the jet they just dropped flares and use afterburner up to the sky and is outside the range of AA turrets. After that they gun you down before you can even get a lock. That AA vehicle sure it could bring it down but since you pretty much exposed and weak against any type of AT guy you never live long enough.
Welcome to the world of internet gays.  When i was in a jet my objective was to:

1.  Blast their jets out of the sky (and keep them grounded if the rules permitted it)
2.  First responder to a flag being taken or cries for assistance.

If i was in a bomber i would taxi my co pilot and let him smash ground targets until his 15 homing missiles were emptied and only use my payload when a flag was being taken....there were few players who played like me.

However the jets rules the battlefield, if you're team isn't dealing with one, either find a new team or learn how to fly.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Lucien
Fantasma Parastasie
+1,451|6897
or you could have been a good player and actually killed shit

your choice
https://i.imgur.com/HTmoH.jpg
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5946|College Park, MD
Ah man I remember the days of co-piloting an F-15. Loved the missiles lol.

I always loved the F/A-18 though, that was a fun plane to fly. Shame you usually had the shitty F-35, against a J-10.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
Lucien
Fantasma Parastasie
+1,451|6897
yeah the balance between jets was way off on literally every map
https://i.imgur.com/HTmoH.jpg
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6530|Denmark aka Automotive Hell
If they add jets they damn well better add some proper AA instead of the completely useless kind you had in BF2

Specifically more flak/machinegun AA instead of missiles

Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-02-04 09:09:11)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
CC-Marley
Member
+407|7073
Didn't 1.5 even things out some? Honestly, I only played a few minutes after the 1.5 patch.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5423|Sydney
All sound pretty good so far. The trailer is shite though. It's like watching a local volley ball match and expecting porn.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6782|Long Island, New York
I'm pretty excited hearing all the new details. 64 player servers, prone and jets might not seem like a big deal because everyone is so used to it here. However, people were worried that the console generation would destroy that and DICE would remove it. Doesn't look like that's the case.

Also, New York, Paris and Tehran? Sounds good to me.

This is gonna make me want a gaming PC SO bad...


Jaekus wrote:

All sound pretty good so far. The trailer is shite though. It's like watching a local volley ball match and expecting porn.
It's a teaser for a game that won't be out for another 9 months at least. Dead Space 2 did the same thing, as have many other games.

Last edited by Poseidon (2011-02-04 10:14:45)

Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7011|UK
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011- … evel-paris

EA's forthcoming Battlefield 3 FPS will cut a destructive swathe through Paris, New York and Tehran, according to retailer information.

Following this morning's Game Informer reveal, a GAME product listing dug up by Gamerzines has offered a few more details of what to expect from the shooter, due for release on PC, PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 later this year.

"In Battlefield 3, players step into the role of the elite U.S. Marines where they will experience heart-pounding single player missions and competitive multiplayer actions ranging across diverse locations from around the globe including Paris, Tehran and New York," it reads.

The listing goes on to pledge that you'll get to "watch buildings crumble and cover disappear as bullets and explosion tear through your surroundings! Even landmarks you recognise aren't safe from the destruction you'll inflict!"

We're taking that as confirmation you'll get to knock the Eiffel Tower over.
DefCon-17
Maple Syrup Faggot
+362|6400|Vancouver | Canada
I'd rather they skip the singleplayer and just focus on multiplayer.

Either way, I'm excited now.
Kez
Member
+778|5947|London, UK


Must-buy for the PC!
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6530|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Kez wrote:



Must-buy for the PC!
https://img441.imageshack.us/img441/8274/1258766753564.jpg

Let's see how badly dice fucks it up before we say that huh?
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6876|949

who are you kidding, floppy?  You'll bitch and moan about it here before you even play it, torrent it, then complain about the game that you ripped for free.  No wonder you're so miserable.

I'm a little apprehensive about the whole "mount your weapon anywhere", "drag wounded players" and "feel bullets and explosions".  I don't tend to like auto animations in game, so I hope if these are implemented you still get a decent amount of control while performing them.
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6530|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

who are you kidding, floppy?  You'll bitch and moan about it here before you even play it, torrent it, then complain about the game that you ripped for free.  No wonder you're so miserable.
Irrelevant... calling anything that has not been released yet a "Must buy" is plain silly...
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6876|949

just like calling anything that hasn't been released "BC2.1".  Yes, I think you have a valid point there.
DefCon-17
Maple Syrup Faggot
+362|6400|Vancouver | Canada
Wait...you have 3 stat pages of games they've made in your signature.
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6530|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

DefCon-17 wrote:

Wait...you have 3 stat pages of games they've made in your signature.
und?
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6782|Long Island, New York

FloppY_ wrote:

Kez wrote:



Must-buy for the PC!
http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/8274 … 753564.jpg

Let's see how badly dice fucks it up before we say that huh?
Why do you insist on making such stupid posts on a ridiculously consistent basis? I just don't get it. Just like Defcon said, you've bought many of their products and seem to like them considering you have the stats pages... and here you are claiming DICE is gonna fuck it up? What kind of retarded fucking logic is that?

This is a BF2 website. It's not stupid for someone to call it a must buy.
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6530|Denmark aka Automotive Hell
I love how you all rage under the assumption that I hate this game...
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6934|Tampa Bay Florida
Fuck the haters.

I love Battlefield, so do many other people here.  Sure, Bad Company and #2 was not as good as BF2 but that's irrelevant.  They were trying to make games that were good on the consoles, which is the only way they are ever going to make money.  Can anyone say honestly that they were not impressed by the frostbite engine?

And lets not forget the number of people here many years ago who constantly bitched and moaned about BF2..... on a BF2 fan site.  That was truly pathetic.

I have faith that BF3 will be incredibly bad ass.  And lots of people will say it sucks, just like any other game ever created.  If you dont like it, dont play it.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6467|Escea

Looks like its heading back to the more realistic approach too, with the right weapons for nationalities.

Hopefully, the drag feature is a lot more refined than that in ArmA, which is good but slow and cumbersome.

Looking forward to it already.
NooBesT
Pizzahitler
+873|6713

Spearhead wrote:

Fuck the haters.

I love Battlefield, so do many other people here.  Sure, Bad Company and #2 was not as good as BF2 but that's irrelevant.  They were trying to make games that were good on the consoles, which is the only way they are ever going to make money.  Can anyone say honestly that they were not impressed by the frostbite engine?

And lets not forget the number of people here many years ago who constantly bitched and moaned about BF2..... on a BF2 fan site.  That was truly pathetic.

I have faith that BF3 will be incredibly bad ass.  And lots of people will say it sucks, just like any other game ever created.  If you dont like it, dont play it.
If there's something wrong about the game but you still like the game you can't point out the things you don't like?

If BF3 is even half as good as BF2 was I'm surprised.
https://i.imgur.com/S9bg2.png
DefCon-17
Maple Syrup Faggot
+362|6400|Vancouver | Canada
I can see the drag feature being awesome when you're playing with friends.

Also...is anyone pulling a Diablo and playing BF2 again?
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6876|949

DefCon-17 wrote:

I can see the drag feature being awesome when you're playing with friends.

Also...is anyone pulling a Diablo and playing BF2 again?
I played it again recently and I was surprised by how slow and cumbersome the action looks and feels.  I got used to the way BC2 moves.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard