{M5}Sniper3
Typical white person.
+389|7051|San Antonio, Texas

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

I haven't read any significant bible passages in about 10 years now.  Can anyone point me in the direction of when and where marriage is explicitly mentioned and/or defined in the bible?

Genesis 2:18 wrote:

18 The Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.”

Genesis 2:23-24 wrote:

23 The man said,

“This is now bone of my bones

and flesh of my flesh;

she shall be called ‘woman’,

for she was taken out of man.”

24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.

Leviticus 18:22 wrote:

22 “ ‘Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.

Ephesians 5:22-33 wrote:

22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord.  23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior.  24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.

25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her  26 to make her holy, cleansinga her by the washing with water through the word,  27 and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless.  28 In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.  29 After all, no one ever hated his own body, but he feeds and cares for it, just as Christ does the church—  30 for we are members of his body.  31 “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.”b  32 This is a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church.  33 However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.

Romans 1:26-27 wrote:

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.  27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 wrote:

9 Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders  10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

1 Corinthians 7:1-9 wrote:

7 Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good for a man not to marry.a  2 But since there is so much immorality, each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband.  3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband.  4 The wife’s body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband’s body does not belong to him alone but also to his wife.  5 Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.  6 I say this as a concession, not as a command.  7 I wish that all men were as I am. But each man has his own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.

8 Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am.  9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

Matthew 19:4-6 wrote:

4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’a  5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’b?  6 So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.”
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,983|6923|949

You do know the definition of explicit, right?

You say government shouldn't have a say in marriage but then support the government defining marriage as between a man and a woman.  Do you see the hypocrisy?
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6840|San Diego, CA, USA
I bet alot of Lawyers are behind trying to get Gay Marriage legalized...I mean right now when a Gay couple divorces there's no legal right to 50% of their spouses stuff (30% of which the Lawyer gets).
{M5}Sniper3
Typical white person.
+389|7051|San Antonio, Texas

Flecco wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

I haven't read any significant bible passages in about 10 years now.  Can anyone point me in the direction of when and where marriage is explicitly mentioned and/or defined in the bible?
It was in Leviticus.

You know.

The book of laws both practical and arbitrary that Jesus said was no longer necessary.


Hey anybody know which book that thing about putting unbelievers to the sword is from?

Leviticus 26:6-9 wrote:

6 “ ‘I will grant peace in the land, and you will lie down and no one will make you afraid. I will remove savage beasts from the land, and the sword will not pass through your country.  7 You will pursue your enemies, and they will fall by the sword before you.  8 Five of you will chase a hundred, and a hundred of you will chase ten thousand, and your enemies will fall by the sword before you.

9 “ ‘I will look on you with favor and make you fruitful and increase your numbers, and I will keep my covenant with you.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6696|North Carolina
This still goes back to the facts that Christianity isn't the only religion in America and Christianity isn't the only religion that defines marriage.

Secondly, isn't it a bit ironic that conservatives complain about legislating from the bench, but they have no problem doing it from scripture?
{M5}Sniper3
Typical white person.
+389|7051|San Antonio, Texas

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

You do know the definition of explicit, right?

You say government shouldn't have a say in marriage but then support the government defining marriage as between a man and a woman.  Do you see the hypocrisy?
I supported the voice of the people being upheld by the courts. I believe marriage is between one man and one woman. It was the people that decided that that would be the law of the land.

Hurricane2k9 then retorted to me:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Separation of church and state. If you want government ruled by religion, move to Iran.
In which I responded:

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

Then government shouldn't have any say in marriage, it would be though the church and the church only. And there shouldn't be any governmental benefit to being married.
That is if he wanted total separation of church and state that marriage wouldn't be a legal matter at all.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,983|6923|949

Harmor wrote:

I bet alot of Lawyers are behind trying to get Gay Marriage legalized...I mean right now when a Gay couple divorces there's no legal right to 50% of their spouses stuff (30% of which the Lawyer gets).
Are you crazy dude?  The lawyer doesn't get 30% of an estate in a divorce.
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5993|College Park, MD

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

That is if he wanted total separation of church and state that marriage wouldn't be a legal matter at all.
It shouldn't be. But you and I know that people will bitch forever if we took away their tax breaks and insurance breaks and hospital rights etc. So why not have everything in law be called a civil union? If people want to be married under god, then let that be up to the churches.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
{M5}Sniper3
Typical white person.
+389|7051|San Antonio, Texas

Turquoise wrote:

This still goes back to the facts that Christianity isn't the only religion in America and Christianity isn't the only religion that defines marriage.

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

The Bible clearly defines marriage between a man and a woman, nothing in there about race. Now other religious texts, I do not know if they define marriage between a man and woman of same races, but I do not believe that they do.
I know that Christianity isn't the only religion in America and Christianity isn't the only religion that defines marriage, that's why they held an open vote. It wasn't just a vote for Christians, it was open to all races and creeds. The votes were tallied and the decision was made. That's how it works in America.

Turquoise wrote:

Secondly, isn't it a bit ironic that conservatives complain about legislating from the bench, but they have no problem doing it from scripture?
The voters voted, judges interpret the laws that voters and elected officials make as well as administer blind justice.

Just look at the oath of justices and judges:

“I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the Constitution and laws of the United States.  So help me God.”
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6696|North Carolina

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

This still goes back to the facts that Christianity isn't the only religion in America and Christianity isn't the only religion that defines marriage.

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

The Bible clearly defines marriage between a man and a woman, nothing in there about race. Now other religious texts, I do not know if they define marriage between a man and woman of same races, but I do not believe that they do.
I know that Christianity isn't the only religion in America and Christianity isn't the only religion that defines marriage, that's why they held an open vote. It wasn't just a vote for Christians, it was open to all races and creeds. The votes were tallied and the decision was made. That's how it works in America.

Turquoise wrote:

Secondly, isn't it a bit ironic that conservatives complain about legislating from the bench, but they have no problem doing it from scripture?
The voters voted, judges interpret the laws that voters and elected officials make as well as administer blind justice.

Just look at the oath of justices and judges:

“I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the Constitution and laws of the United States.  So help me God.”
If nothing else, though, you do have to admit that sometimes what is popular must be subverted.

For example, Jim Crow laws were popular at one time.  The courts had to go against popular will to change that.
DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6972|Disaster Free Zone

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

"they will teach gay marriage in schools"
Already happening.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PgjcgqFYP4


And it's funny how people say "religion FTL again", when marriage is a sacred religious ceremony.
The fuck it is. Marriage was around long before any religion specifically Christianity the one you keep referring to.

CC-Marley wrote:

sodom and gomorrah
Got hit by a meteor, what the fuck is your point?

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

The Bible clearly defines marriage between a man and a woman, nothing in there about race. Now other religious texts, I do not know if they define marriage between a man and woman of same races, but I do not believe that they do.
The bible means jack shit, apart from your countries whole speperation of church and state. Marriage (as explained above and by flecco) existed before the bible, before the tora, before your so called 'proof' it is only between a man and a women.

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

The Bible was written around 1400 B.C., Rome was founded around 750 B.C., Carthage was founded around 810 B.C.
And the Egyptians, who married there siblings, parents and children were around before 3000 BC.
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7066|Moscow, Russia

DrunkFace wrote:

The bible means jack shit, apart from your countries whole speperation of church and state. Marriage (as explained above and by flecco) existed before the bible, before the tora, before your so called 'proof' it is only between a man and a women.
owned
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Ajax_the_Great1
Dropped on request
+206|6938
"Ephesians 5:22-33 wrote:
22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord.  23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior.  24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything."

A great passage to show your wife when she starts mouthing off btw.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6873|SE London

Macbeth wrote:

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

Flecco wrote:

Hey, guess what, in Ye Olde Europe, back in the times of the Romans and Greeks... You know pre-Christ and such. When they were pagans yeah...

People got married. AMFGMARRIAGEWITHOUTGODWTFISTHISSHIT?!?!?!??!??!

Marriage had nothing to do with Christianity in the Western World until the Catholic Church hijacked it as a means to further spread its influence and power, okay? Cool. Sorted. How about you learn some history before you spout off shit.

It was, is, and should remain a government institution under the control of the government. You want them to not be able to be 'married' before God? Fine, change the name of the ceremonies the Christian/Islamic/Hebrew Churches hold to 'religious unions' or something similar. Personally, I don't give two shits whether a homosexual marriages are legal or not. It doesn't affect me. I don't like it when religious bigots come in here spouting off 'fact' from a 1700 year old political document and have no clue as to the history of what they are talking about.
The Bible was written around 1400 B.C., Rome was founded around 750 B.C.
You mean the Torah right?
He does indeed. The Bible was compiled in 325AD.

The original texts that the old Testament is formed of also supported things like marrying young children - I suppose we should be following that too, since that's what God wants - even if the Romans didn't see fit to include it in the final drafts of the Bible.

Of course the Greeks, Romans, Assyrians, Egyptians never had marriage because it hadn't been invented by the Christians at that point.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6940

Turquoise wrote:

This still goes back to the facts that Christianity isn't the only religion in America and Christianity isn't the only religion that defines marriage.

Secondly, isn't it a bit ironic that conservatives complain about legislating from the bench, but they have no problem doing it from scripture?
As a rule of thumb, Conservatives are gigantic hypocrites.
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7027|Salt Lake City

The Bible also supports selling your children and taking slaves, so I suppose we should go back to that as well.  I just love how Christians always say they follow the new testament when you start talking about what the old testament really says, but have no trouble falling back to the old testament when it suits their needs.

Major hypocrisy.
13rin
Member
+977|6770

ghettoperson wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

This still goes back to the facts that Christianity isn't the only religion in America and Christianity isn't the only religion that defines marriage.

Secondly, isn't it a bit ironic that conservatives complain about legislating from the bench, but they have no problem doing it from scripture?
As a rule of thumb, Conservatives are gigantic hypocrites.
That is a stereotypical bigoted response.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
13rin
Member
+977|6770

Turquoise wrote:

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

This still goes back to the facts that Christianity isn't the only religion in America and Christianity isn't the only religion that defines marriage.

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

The Bible clearly defines marriage between a man and a woman, nothing in there about race. Now other religious texts, I do not know if they define marriage between a man and woman of same races, but I do not believe that they do.
I know that Christianity isn't the only religion in America and Christianity isn't the only religion that defines marriage, that's why they held an open vote. It wasn't just a vote for Christians, it was open to all races and creeds. The votes were tallied and the decision was made. That's how it works in America.

Turquoise wrote:

Secondly, isn't it a bit ironic that conservatives complain about legislating from the bench, but they have no problem doing it from scripture?
The voters voted, judges interpret the laws that voters and elected officials make as well as administer blind justice.

Just look at the oath of justices and judges:

“I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the Constitution and laws of the United States.  So help me God.”
If nothing else, though, you do have to admit that sometimes what is popular must be subverted.

For example, Jim Crow laws were popular at one time.  The courts had to go against popular will to change that.
Funny, wern't the jim crow laws a democrat thing?
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6940

DBBrinson1 wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

This still goes back to the facts that Christianity isn't the only religion in America and Christianity isn't the only religion that defines marriage.

Secondly, isn't it a bit ironic that conservatives complain about legislating from the bench, but they have no problem doing it from scripture?
As a rule of thumb, Conservatives are gigantic hypocrites.
That is a stereotypical bigoted response.
Perhaps, maybe I should have said the religious right. They always claim they believe in small government, but then as soon as it comes to gay marriage and abortion, they can't wait for the government to jump in and make it illegal.
Man With No Name
جندي
+148|5866|The Wild West
sniper, stick to your glen beck and tea parties.  they are full of the same kind of ignorance that fill your posts.


this is why the republican party loses.
Man With No Name
جندي
+148|5866|The Wild West

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

I haven't read any significant bible passages in about 10 years now.  Can anyone point me in the direction of when and where marriage is explicitly mentioned and/or defined in the bible?

Genesis 2:18 wrote:

18 The Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.”

Genesis 2:23-24 wrote:

23 The man said,

“This is now bone of my bones

and flesh of my flesh;

she shall be called ‘woman’,

for she was taken out of man.”

24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.

Leviticus 18:22 wrote:

22 “ ‘Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.

Ephesians 5:22-33 wrote:

22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord.  23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior.  24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.

25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her  26 to make her holy, cleansinga her by the washing with water through the word,  27 and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless.  28 In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.  29 After all, no one ever hated his own body, but he feeds and cares for it, just as Christ does the church—  30 for we are members of his body.  31 “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.”b  32 This is a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church.  33 However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.

Romans 1:26-27 wrote:

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.  27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 wrote:

9 Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders  10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

1 Corinthians 7:1-9 wrote:

7 Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good for a man not to marry.a  2 But since there is so much immorality, each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband.  3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband.  4 The wife’s body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband’s body does not belong to him alone but also to his wife.  5 Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.  6 I say this as a concession, not as a command.  7 I wish that all men were as I am. But each man has his own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.

8 Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am.  9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

Matthew 19:4-6 wrote:

4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’a  5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’b?  6 So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.”
Dude, you sound EXACTLY like a jihadist.
PureFodder
Member
+225|6577
The only way you can sensibly argue that the bible is a reason to stop gay marriage is if you also agree with all the other wierd laws from the first testament about stoning people working on sundays or touching the skin of a pig and selling your kids for slavery etc.
Man With No Name
جندي
+148|5866|The Wild West
we pick and choose inthe 21st
destruktion_6143
Was ist Loos?
+154|6918|Canada
What i dont understand is why the hell the mormon church got involved. thats not fucking right.
Man With No Name
جندي
+148|5866|The Wild West
polygamists know much more about the sanctity of marriage than gay people do

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard