| yes, but it is still torture | 31% | 31% - 14 | ||||
| yes, is it really torture if a person would volunteer? | 35% | 35% - 16 | ||||
| no, it is torture | 31% | 31% - 14 | ||||
| no, it is not torture but noway Jose' | 2% | 2% - 1 | ||||
| Total: 45 | ||||||
Actually it is an argument that people who selected that are:Aries_37 wrote:
because some people could put up with short pain/ discomfort if they knew in return they would get 4 months of their life back.
please don't try to construe this into some sort of argument about how waterboarding is not some sort of cruel/unusual punishment.
why would they be retarded fucking idiots?Lotta_Drool wrote:
Actually it is an argument that people who selected that are:Aries_37 wrote:
because some people could put up with short pain/ discomfort if they knew in return they would get 4 months of their life back.
please don't try to construe this into some sort of argument about how waterboarding is not some sort of cruel/unusual punishment.
A: OK with torture
B: Retarded fucking idiots
spite?cpt.fass1 wrote:
Why wouldn't you just tell them what they wanted to know?
So 4 months in prison is Torture? Worse Torture than waterboarding?Aries_37 wrote:
why would they be retarded fucking idiots?Lotta_Drool wrote:
Actually it is an argument that people who selected that are:Aries_37 wrote:
because some people could put up with short pain/ discomfort if they knew in return they would get 4 months of their life back.
please don't try to construe this into some sort of argument about how waterboarding is not some sort of cruel/unusual punishment.
A: OK with torture
B: Retarded fucking idiots
Believing that waterboarding/torture is unacceptable and inhumane and being willing to trade 4 months prison time for 1 session of torture aren't mutually exclusive. Especially when you consider your scenario of knowing exactly what they will do, knowing that your life is not in danger, knowing you will have only one session, knowing that their will be a payoff, knowing they won't do anything beyond what has been agreed.
Hows this grab you? Conservative radio hosts gets waterboarded, and lasts six seconds before saying its tortureFEOS wrote:
You've hit the other nail on the head: agenda. They have to show how "horrible" it is and share it with the world to increase the outrage. Then their name gets associated with its banning and they get a Pulitzer. Then on to the next agenda-driven "story" as opposed to reporting the facts.[TUF]Catbox wrote:
I was just about to type the same thing....lmao... Comparing pussy journalists to terrorists... hahaFEOS wrote:
Could it be that they're fucking pussies?
shocker the pussy journalist wouldn't last long... would kind of put a crimp on their anti waterboarding crusade...
It would be great to see a journalist get waterboarded and say... that was really unpleasant...but my head is still attached...
Dude, why not just get to the point instead of coming up with some insane scenario in an attempt to "prove" to someone that they are hypocrites or something? Sergeriver used to do this all the time and in the end you just come off looking like a whiney little douche.Lotta_Drool wrote:
For the people who would submit to waterboarding to get out of 4 months of prison but feel it is still torture,
Why are you not calling for the end of keeping people in prison since you feel 4 months in jail is worse than waterboarding?
I bet I know what you picked.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Dude, why not just get to the point instead of coming up with some insane scenario in an attempt to "prove" to someone that they are hypocrites or something? Sergeriver used to do this all the time and in the end you just come off looking like a whiney little douche.Lotta_Drool wrote:
For the people who would submit to waterboarding to get out of 4 months of prison but feel it is still torture,
Why are you not calling for the end of keeping people in prison since you feel 4 months in jail is worse than waterboarding?
I don't participate in stupid polls. I only came in here to let you know how I felt. Feel free to talk shit on me as this will be the last time I view this thread.Lotta_Drool wrote:
I bet I know what you picked.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Dude, why not just get to the point instead of coming up with some insane scenario in an attempt to "prove" to someone that they are hypocrites or something? Sergeriver used to do this all the time and in the end you just come off looking like a whiney little douche.Lotta_Drool wrote:
For the people who would submit to waterboarding to get out of 4 months of prison but feel it is still torture,
Why are you not calling for the end of keeping people in prison since you feel 4 months in jail is worse than waterboarding?
I see you missed were I said they were fucking pussies. Either explanation works.ghettoperson wrote:
Hows this grab you? Conservative radio hosts gets waterboarded, and lasts six seconds before saying its tortureFEOS wrote:
You've hit the other nail on the head: agenda. They have to show how "horrible" it is and share it with the world to increase the outrage. Then their name gets associated with its banning and they get a Pulitzer. Then on to the next agenda-driven "story" as opposed to reporting the facts.[TUF]Catbox wrote:
I was just about to type the same thing....lmao... Comparing pussy journalists to terrorists... haha
shocker the pussy journalist wouldn't last long... would kind of put a crimp on their anti waterboarding crusade...
It would be great to see a journalist get waterboarded and say... that was really unpleasant...but my head is still attached...
Don't worry, he's probably just a deep-cover liberal.
When they use like 10 pellets.. one is just child's play.Man With No Name wrote:
CS gas is fucking torture.
You mean like the CIA?FEOS wrote:
I see you missed were I said they were fucking pussies.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-05-23 00:58:49)
lol...some people pay hookers/call girls/w/e for that shit dude (suffocation, etc). you people really need to get a grip.Macbeth wrote:
If it is so easy why every time a journalist tries it they only last a few seconds? Also anyone ever enjoyed it?usmarine wrote:
it aint a big deal. if you ever had an older sibling hold your head under water in the pool to fuck with you, then you have done it. or you can go to sere school.Mekstizzle wrote:
if usmarine can do it i can do it
no....but butt rape causes physical harm. it actually would hurt i would imagine. nice try though dogbert. GS and I (along with others) know you are full of shit. so please stop talking to us. just speak to the people who dont know any better.Dilbert_X wrote:
And some people just love buttsecks.
Would you enjoy being tied down and butt-raped by 183 Iraqis eh marine?
As can suffocation - congratulations, you defeated your own argument - again.but butt rape causes physical harm, it actually would hurt i would imagine
how? i have been water boarded...no issues. i would think butt rape would have caused me more harm yes? you are such a little internet dork. go get some life experience then come back and argue.Dilbert_X wrote:
As can suffocation - congratulations, you defeated your own argument - again.but butt rape causes physical harm, it actually would hurt i would imagine
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-05-23 01:54:37)
lol..says the fat white internet geekDilbert_X wrote:
You had the kiddy version.
Oh right I see, so as soon as someone agreed with you and then changes their mind they're a pussy and when they never agreed with you they're spinning it for a Pulitzer.FEOS wrote:
I see you missed were I said they were fucking pussies. Either explanation works.ghettoperson wrote:
Hows this grab you? Conservative radio hosts gets waterboarded, and lasts six seconds before saying its tortureFEOS wrote:
You've hit the other nail on the head: agenda. They have to show how "horrible" it is and share it with the world to increase the outrage. Then their name gets associated with its banning and they get a Pulitzer. Then on to the next agenda-driven "story" as opposed to reporting the facts.
Don't worry, he's probably just a deep-cover liberal.
