BF2S Forums While the globe may be warming, it is not manmade.

SonderKommando wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Oh goody, another topic where Mitchy spouts some bullshit about something he knows nothing about, with no regard for facts, figures, or general scientific consensus.

Mitch wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … perts.html

I could literally post 20 links

Oh my bad, he has a source...


Fucking lol Mitch, is this some kind of e-persona or are you this stupid in real life as well?

dunno, says here that there are quite a few scientist disagree with the UN's panel on climate change.  About 800 are meeting in New York.
http://www.heartland.org/publications/e … n_NYC.html

your name will fit you well after they start capping and taxing carbon emissions.

I'm sure there are. Scientists would be pretty crap at their jobs if they all agreed with each other about everything. In any case, had he perhaps made some attempt to post the ideas of some of these scientists with some sources I'd have been a little more tolerant. As it stands all this is reminding me of is his ridiculously flawed rant the other week about how ADHD didn't exist.

Mitch wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Mitch wrote:

Why are you afraid to look beyond the general belief thats pushed by politicians?

lol That is funny considering your just pushing another general belief used by a different set of politicians.

Why would a politician push an unpopular belief that demotes the idea of them getting their hands on more tax money -.-

O sweet lord.
I guess I will explain it to you in great detail.
1. The GOP loves big business, big business hates taxes on them.
2. Everyone hates taxes on them, so fighting taxes is a good thing for the GOP
3. Unpopular to a group of people bf2s is not an accurate dipliaction of the world as a whole.
4. Science is bad unless it proves what you like, fight science get votes.
Get it Mitch?

I'm sure there were people who doubted ozone layer depletion from CFCs, but it's the sort of thing where you want to err on the safe side.  If there is even a moderate chance that we might be exacerbating global warming, it should be investigated and greenhouse gas production curtailed just for the sake of future generations.  I believe in climate cycles, and we may very well be in the midst of a warming trend, but I don't think it unreasonable to assume that we might be "fanning the fire" so to speak, and could potentially cause much more dramatic climate change than would otherwise happen.  If the oceans rise too fast, it's not the end of the world per se, but you are looking at a disaster on the scale of Katrina, multiplied by, say, a million...gradual destruction of many major world cities, mass exodus of coastal dwellers, etc.

If politicians could see past the next election cycle we would have probably already had more significant government support for lowered emissions and increased efficiency of various industries/products/etc..., but this is stuff that involves a lot of research, and thus money, that might otherwise go towards ultimately filling some rich guys' bank accounts even further.

I think Mitch is just an account someone made to make the side he argues for look stupid, therefore making the opposite side of the argument look correct.

Discuss.

Warhammer wrote:

NooBesT wrote:

You can't prove that you exist.

Discuss.

Here's my DNA

Your DNA is just as meaningful as your body in trying to prove NooBest wrong. You can't answer a philosophical question except with another philosophical question that is even more curious and perplexing than the previous.

Superior Mind wrote:

Warhammer wrote:

NooBesT wrote:

You can't prove that you exist.

Discuss.

Here's my DNA

Your DNA is just as meaningful as your body in trying to prove NooBest wrong. You can't answer a philosophical question except with another philosophical question that is even more curious and perplexing than the previous.

Superior Mind is superior.

Warhammer wrote:

NooBesT wrote:

Warhammer wrote:

Here's my DNA

How does that prove it?

It was meant to be humours was thinking adding something to it.

I'll add to your DNA.

If you know what I mean...

Last edited by AussieReaper (2009-03-31 20:35:21)

destruktion_6143 wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Warhammer wrote:

It was meant to be humours was thinking adding something to it.

I'll add to you're DNA.

If you know what I mean...

Bow chica wow wow

Pubic wrote:

OMG...Al Gore has come up with a plan to plug volcanoes in order to stop global warning...I mean, come on!!

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiap … index.html

Yeah, right, the pressure would just build and build until the whole world blew apart!

The Earth warms and cools...I mean there are at least 10 recorded Ice Ages.  My only question is "How does it cool once its warmed up?"

Global warming is a scam that lends credibility to the greenie earth movement. The earth warming and cooling is due to natural cycles with the sun, and there can be effects from volcano activity.

Pollution is a separate problem and one that can have international consequences. In some ways its easier to speak directly to the people in different nations by using the greenie global warming speak, than to try and come up with bilateral or multilateral accords on pollution using just diplomatic chanels.


Ultimately the government support  of the global warming crowd has always been about setting up a new false market in carbon credits to create a new cash cow for bureaucrats. And when those taxes hit get ready for a doubling or tripling of your energy costs.

Cap and trade will cost us dearly
families and workers would still have to pay $6.735 trillion into the system in the form of higher energy costs to get back an estimated $802 billion in tax relief.  That’s a return of $1.00 for every $8.40 paid.

I'm sorry but when there is $6.7 trillion on the table to picked up by the government and even more money for other govts around the world, then I'm going to have to take the reports by all the govt sponsored scientists with a grain of salt.... a lime.... and a big ass glass of tequila.

IMO volcanoes have more impact on global climate than farting cows do.... But you can't tax a volcano can you? But you can tax steak!

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Pubic wrote:

OMG...Al Gore has come up with a plan to plug volcanoes in order to stop global warning...I mean, come on!!

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiap … index.html

Yeah, right, the pressure would just build and build until the whole world blew apart!

at least'd it'd kill manbearpig

i'm super cereal