Shouldn't matter, but the others aren't really useful. When you press the benchmark key, does your FPS turn green?
yes but then it disappears... maybe i should reinstall frapsCrazeD wrote:
Shouldn't matter, but the others aren't really useful. When you press the benchmark key, does your FPS turn green?
Mine disappears too, but it continues to benchmark.
Hmm. okCrazeD wrote:
Mine disappears too, but it continues to benchmark.
ill try again later when im not doing physics homework
Ok i got it working.
Frames Time (ms) Min Max Avg
96819 428409 67 502 225.997
thats wat i got... 67fps must have been when my airstrike killed like 4 guys while killing me lol
Frames Time (ms) Min Max Avg
96819 428409 67 502 225.997
thats wat i got... 67fps must have been when my airstrike killed like 4 guys while killing me lol
Last edited by Little BaBy JESUS (2009-02-10 02:22:30)
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
3576, 50121, 49, 94, 71.347
Why do I always get shafted?
3576, 50121, 49, 94, 71.347
Why do I always get shafted?
then again it not like you really need any more than a minimum of 49 fps... a average of 70 is perfectly playable.CrazeD wrote:
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
3576, 50121, 49, 94, 71.347
Why do I always get shafted?
do you guys bench on single or multiplayer? Itns known that multiplayers are usually less demanding to ensure lag free gameplay....
edit: only proper way to bench on cod 4 is all chillied up map as its the most demanding...
edit: only proper way to bench on cod 4 is all chillied up map as its the most demanding...
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2009-02-10 03:16:41)
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
yer i know... but i was just doing that to compare to finnyGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
do you guys bench on single or multiplayer? Itns known that multiplayers are usually less demanding to ensure lag free gameplay....
edit: only proper way to bench on cod 4 is all chillied up map as its the most demanding...
just made sure no one gets any wild ideas when seeing ppl get double the framerates with same hardware
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
25932, 276895, 35, 280, 93.653
Wat. That was on All Ghillied Up, 1280x1024, 4xAA, Max textures, all settings on high if poss. 16xAF.
25932, 276895, 35, 280, 93.653
Wat. That was on All Ghillied Up, 1280x1024, 4xAA, Max textures, all settings on high if poss. 16xAF.
#1, <70 is too laggy for me, and,Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
then again it not like you really need any more than a minimum of 49 fps... a average of 70 is perfectly playable.CrazeD wrote:
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
3576, 50121, 49, 94, 71.347
Why do I always get shafted?
#2, I want the 125 FPS bug.
That's odd, as your screen doesn't receive data more than 60 times a second.CrazeD wrote:
#1, <70 is too laggy for me.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
then again it not like you really need any more than a minimum of 49 fps... a average of 70 is perfectly playable.CrazeD wrote:
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
3576, 50121, 49, 94, 71.347
Why do I always get shafted?
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
this ^Freezer7Pro wrote:
That's odd, as your screen doesn't receive data more than 60 times a second.
(unless it's a CRT with a higher refresh rate than 60Hz, but you'ld probably know that if you had a monitor like that)
No, it doesn't send data faster than 60 times a second.Freezer7Pro wrote:
That's odd, as your screen doesn't receive data more than 60 times a second.CrazeD wrote:
#1, <70 is too laggy for me.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
then again it not like you really need any more than a minimum of 49 fps... a average of 70 is perfectly playable.
But that is irrelevant, because the game images do not change more than like 20 times per second. Let's not start this debate again. I can notice a very distinct difference between 60FPS and >100FPS, and if you can't then you've either never tried or you're retarded.
I know exactly what you mean CrazeD.
What gfx card do you have? Have you heard about issue called stuttering? It is that weird lag although the fps seems to be perfectly fine. That is most noticable at under 70fps like you said. Usually it is issue with multi-GPU solutions, often having issue called micro-stuttering. But in rare cases it can affect single gpu cards too.
What gfx card do you have? Have you heard about issue called stuttering? It is that weird lag although the fps seems to be perfectly fine. That is most noticable at under 70fps like you said. Usually it is issue with multi-GPU solutions, often having issue called micro-stuttering. But in rare cases it can affect single gpu cards too.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Stuttering (like panzer said) =/= low FPS. If I don't run VSync'd, I get really bad stuttering in even BF2. And that's on a fucking 260GTX.CrazeD wrote:
No, it doesn't send data faster than 60 times a second.Freezer7Pro wrote:
That's odd, as your screen doesn't receive data more than 60 times a second.CrazeD wrote:
#1, <70 is too laggy for me.
But that is irrelevant, because the game images do not change more than like 20 times per second. Let's not start this debate again. I can notice a very distinct difference between 60FPS and >100FPS, and if you can't then you've either never tried or you're retarded.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
AMD X2 4800+ @ 3.0GHzGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
I know exactly what you mean CrazeD.
What gfx card do you have? Have you heard about issue called stuttering? It is that weird lag although the fps seems to be perfectly fine. That is most noticable at under 70fps like you said. Usually it is issue with multi-GPU solutions, often having issue called micro-stuttering. But in rare cases it can affect single gpu cards too.
2x2GB G.Skill DDR2 1000 @ 1000MHz
HD4850 @ stock
Wouldn't this stuttering occur at all FPS though? I'm not the only one that experiences this, several of my clan mates and other people I play with agree with me completely that <100 FPS is laggy.
Also I have the AMD dual core optimizer that is supposed to fix that stuttering shit.
here is waht the stuttering is about. Both of the big companies ATi and nVIDIA pretty much ignore the existence of this issue.
http://www.pcgameshardware.com/screensh … es-L4D.png
The bigger the spike is, the more laggy it is... X2 being totally unplayable in this scenario.
edit: due to nature that every frame is different, the stuttering will never be completely away, but it is usually impossible to notice it when using single GPU.
http://www.pcgameshardware.com/screensh … es-L4D.png
The bigger the spike is, the more laggy it is... X2 being totally unplayable in this scenario.
edit: due to nature that every frame is different, the stuttering will never be completely away, but it is usually impossible to notice it when using single GPU.
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2009-02-10 13:34:34)
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Stuttering is awesomely random. You'll notice the difference in that stuttering just appears some times, just all of a sudden. Especially when moving fast. If your FPS meter is reporting 60FPS, and you think it's going slow, it's also stuttering.CrazeD wrote:
AMD X2 4800+ @ 3.0GHzGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
I know exactly what you mean CrazeD.
What gfx card do you have? Have you heard about issue called stuttering? It is that weird lag although the fps seems to be perfectly fine. That is most noticable at under 70fps like you said. Usually it is issue with multi-GPU solutions, often having issue called micro-stuttering. But in rare cases it can affect single gpu cards too.
2x2GB G.Skill DDR2 1000 @ 1000MHz
HD4850 @ stock
Wouldn't this stuttering occur at all FPS though? I'm not the only one that experiences this, several of my clan mates and other people I play with agree with me completely that <100 FPS is laggy.
Also I have the AMD dual core optimizer that is supposed to fix that stuttering shit.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Well I get no stuttering whatsoever at 125 FPS. It's silky smooth. In any case, <100 is laggy and I want the 125FPS perks. So. Idc.
I think it's more to do with CoD4 than any of these stuttering issues. When I play high graphics it goes under 125 in big firefights, or grenades, airstrikes, whatever, but never goes below 60fps. You can see the difference then. But if you cap your FPS at 60, and play for maybe half an hour, you don't notice the difference whatsoever.CrazeD wrote:
Well I get no stuttering whatsoever at 125 FPS. It's silky smooth. In any case, <100 is laggy and I want the 125FPS perks. So. Idc.
Although I never notice any difference from 60-125+ fps on any other game.. it's just a cod4 anomaly I suppose.
I notice it on BF2 and WaW too. GRID and Oblivion aren't as bad though, I'm perfectly happy with 50-60 FPS there.Finray wrote:
I think it's more to do with CoD4 than any of these stuttering issues. When I play high graphics it goes under 125 in big firefights, or grenades, airstrikes, whatever, but never goes below 60fps. You can see the difference then. But if you cap your FPS at 60, and play for maybe half an hour, you don't notice the difference whatsoever.CrazeD wrote:
Well I get no stuttering whatsoever at 125 FPS. It's silky smooth. In any case, <100 is laggy and I want the 125FPS perks. So. Idc.
Although I never notice any difference from 60-125+ fps on any other game.. it's just a cod4 anomaly I suppose.