don't ya fucking hate it when you found a great Youtube clip but the sound is disabled?
makes me wanna go
Youtube.
The Discussion is, is youtube going to far?
makes me wanna go
Youtube.The Discussion is, is youtube going to far?
No. Copyright is copyright.
yeah but like 98% of the bf2 clips got Licenced music on it.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
No. Copyright is copyright.
its annoying.
Sure we've had this discussion before on at least 2 different subforums
But youtube are doing what they must. It's the money grabbers applying the pressure that are retarded.
But youtube are doing what they must. It's the money grabbers applying the pressure that are retarded.
People add them as fast as youtube remove them, copyright isn't a real law.
Lol why?andy12 wrote:
copyright isn't a real law.
Youtube has been killed by all this copyright shit, wished they went back to the old days where Simpson clips where in abundance
these fucking dinosaurs at the record companies need to get with the god damned motherfucking goat-raping timesKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
No. Copyright is copyright.
Instead of preventing people from listening to music, they should make it easier for us to get music we like legally. Some songs on YouTube have links to buy them on the Amazon and iTunes music stores. Some have advertisements for a few seconds at the bottom of the video. THAT's understandable. Muting a video or deleting all the videos with that song? Not understandable.
Scenario 1:
I hear of a band
I go to YouTube to find the band
I listen to their stuff, like it, and go buy their CD or download the song via iTunes
I become a diehard fan and go to their shows
Scenario 2:
I hear of a band
I go to YouTube to find the band
There are no videos with studio versions of their songs
I lose interest and they get no money from me, or I maintain interest and obtain the music illegally
Which do you think would be the more desirable scenario for these greedy pigs?
^ this.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
No. Copyright is copyright.
I think people are just angry because they're getting caught.
If I like an album that I download, I buy it. Otherwise I delete it. As for games, I pretty much always pay for them.
Because it's the internet and nobody gives a shit, hence why it's the most broken "law" ever.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Lol why?andy12 wrote:
copyright isn't a real law.
I know the most realistic scenario-Hurricane2k9 wrote:
these fucking dinosaurs at the record companies need to get with the god damned motherfucking goat-raping timesKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
No. Copyright is copyright.
Instead of preventing people from listening to music, they should make it easier for us to get music we like legally. Some songs on YouTube have links to buy them on the Amazon and iTunes music stores. Some have advertisements for a few seconds at the bottom of the video. THAT's understandable. Muting a video or deleting all the videos with that song? Not understandable.
Scenario 1:
I hear of a band
I go to YouTube to find the band
I listen to their stuff, like it, and go buy their CD or download the song via iTunes
I become a diehard fan and go to their shows
Scenario 2:
I hear of a band
I go to YouTube to find the band
There are no videos with studio versions of their songs
I lose interest and they get no money from me, or I maintain interest and obtain the music illegally
Which do you think would be the more desirable scenario for these greedy pigs?
You hear of a band
You go to Youtube/songza/lala/pandora/last.fm to find the band
You listen, like it, and download from p2p and pay nothing.
Either way, record company gets no money.
Yes, the record companies need to think proactively and find creative ways to charge for content they own. That still doesn't excuse copyright infringement.
That's happened since the dawn of the internets though. All the companies are doing now is alienating those of us who still buy music.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I know the most realistic scenario-
You hear of a band
You go to Youtube/songza/lala/pandora/last.fm to find the band
You listen, like it, and download from p2p and pay nothing.
Either way, record company gets no money.
Yes, the record companies need to think proactively and find creative ways to charge for content they own. That still doesn't excuse copyright infringement.
Really?Hurricane2k9 wrote:
That's happened since the dawn of the internets though. All the companies are doing now is alienating those of us who still buy music.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I know the most realistic scenario-
You hear of a band
You go to Youtube/songza/lala/pandora/last.fm to find the band
You listen, like it, and download from p2p and pay nothing.
Either way, record company gets no money.
Yes, the record companies need to think proactively and find creative ways to charge for content they own. That still doesn't excuse copyright infringement.
"They don't have their music on youtube vids. That's it, I'm not buying another album from them!"
Really?
Yeah, that was my point. If I can find a band's music on YouTube to hear it, and I like it, then I'm more inclined to buy their shit. Don't assume that everybody's got loose morals and that nobody pays for music anymore.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Really?Hurricane2k9 wrote:
That's happened since the dawn of the internets though. All the companies are doing now is alienating those of us who still buy music.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I know the most realistic scenario-
You hear of a band
You go to Youtube/songza/lala/pandora/last.fm to find the band
You listen, like it, and download from p2p and pay nothing.
Either way, record company gets no money.
Yes, the record companies need to think proactively and find creative ways to charge for content they own. That still doesn't excuse copyright infringement.
"They don't have their music on youtube vids. That's it, I'm not buying another album from them!"
Really?
Also, it wasn't "OMG THEY DONT HAVE THEIR MUSIC ON YOUTUBE IM NOT BUYING ANY MOAR LEL"
It was more like "Hm, I can't seem to listen to their work. I'm sure as hell not gonna buy the album only to be disappointed. Guess I'll either forget about them or pirate it."
Last edited by Hurricane2k9 (2009-02-02 15:24:39)
Searching for a band on youtube =/= complaining about a BF2 vid without music
Never encountered this before. Can someone link me to a youtube video that has been fucked please?
Youtube sucked the day Google bought them out. Ever since Google bought them, they removed pretty much every single televsion clip ever. Now they're slowly weeding out every song on there. Now all that's left are the idiots who think that just because they have webcams, people want to listen to them. Other than that it's just trailers for stuff. So basically, now all youtube is, is advertisements and annoying people. It lost its appeal and is now like pretty much every other site.
You can't even watch clips of family guy or whatever else without the douche author having to impose a soundtrack so that it avoid copyright. It is then considered a music video compilation by them...
The people that founded youtube started it as a business. It was a natural progression that the inclusion of copyrighted content would be addressed in regards to youtube's business plan. If you failed to understand that natural progression and instead thought youtube was created so that you could look up music videos and watch Simpsons TV clips I don't feel sorry for you.FrankieSpankie3388 wrote:
Youtube sucked the day Google bought them out. Ever since Google bought them, they removed pretty much every single televsion clip ever. Now they're slowly weeding out every song on there. Now all that's left are the idiots who think that just because they have webcams, people want to listen to them. Other than that it's just trailers for stuff. So basically, now all youtube is, is advertisements and annoying people. It lost its appeal and is now like pretty much every other site.
Internet (and youtube) changed media. It will take more than 1 year for record companies to adjust to the medium and create new revenue streams, so suck it up. People bitching because youtube deletes copyright, record companies bitch because people use unlicensed material. Both need to QQ.
So what you are saying is instead of sampling tracks on youtube we should download them for free? Well I don't know, having Lady gaga as a file is harder to delete than removing the cookies for the youtube search...KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
The people that founded youtube started it as a business. It was a natural progression that the inclusion of copyrighted content would be addressed in regards to youtube's business plan. If you failed to understand that natural progression and instead thought youtube was created so that you could look up music videos and watch Simpsons TV clips I don't feel sorry for you.FrankieSpankie3388 wrote:
Youtube sucked the day Google bought them out. Ever since Google bought them, they removed pretty much every single televsion clip ever. Now they're slowly weeding out every song on there. Now all that's left are the idiots who think that just because they have webcams, people want to listen to them. Other than that it's just trailers for stuff. So basically, now all youtube is, is advertisements and annoying people. It lost its appeal and is now like pretty much every other site.
Internet (and youtube) changed media. It will take more than 1 year for record companies to adjust to the medium and create new revenue streams, so suck it up. People bitching because youtube deletes copyright, record companies bitch because people use unlicensed material. Both need to QQ.
Still wishing someone could link me to a fucked video. I would love to see what everyone is complaining about.
Google should just pay off those douche bags.
"here's a billion dollars if you quit your company bitch"
"here's a billion dollars if you quit your company bitch"
Or send the youtube CEO a hooker.CrazeD wrote:
Google should just pay off those douche bags.
"here's a billion dollars if you quit your company bitch"
"Here's a bitch if you quit your company Bill"
You can sample tracks at Amazon, Itunes, Lala, off a groups website, etc. All those are legitimate. What I'm saying is youtube wasn't created so 14 year-olds could watch music videos and Family Guy clips.andy12 wrote:
So what you are saying is instead of sampling tracks on youtube we should download them for free? Well I don't know, having Lady gaga as a file is harder to delete than removing the cookies for the youtube search...KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
The people that founded youtube started it as a business. It was a natural progression that the inclusion of copyrighted content would be addressed in regards to youtube's business plan. If you failed to understand that natural progression and instead thought youtube was created so that you could look up music videos and watch Simpsons TV clips I don't feel sorry for you.FrankieSpankie3388 wrote:
Youtube sucked the day Google bought them out. Ever since Google bought them, they removed pretty much every single televsion clip ever. Now they're slowly weeding out every song on there. Now all that's left are the idiots who think that just because they have webcams, people want to listen to them. Other than that it's just trailers for stuff. So basically, now all youtube is, is advertisements and annoying people. It lost its appeal and is now like pretty much every other site.
Internet (and youtube) changed media. It will take more than 1 year for record companies to adjust to the medium and create new revenue streams, so suck it up. People bitching because youtube deletes copyright, record companies bitch because people use unlicensed material. Both need to QQ.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2009-02-02 16:20:26)