FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6803|so randum
In the UK at least

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7863316.stm

GB made the mistake of saying 'British jobs for the british' or words to effect.

Fact remains, hire the right man for the right job.

Is this the position to take?
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6832|Global Command
Brown is a whore of the Central Banks.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5889

Just deport all your Polish women to New Jersey. We'll be fine with them here.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6708|North Carolina
Strikes during a recession = fail
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6714|'Murka

Are those getting the jobs British citizens? Or are they immigrants only in the UK on a worker's visa?

Two people equally qualified, one is a citizen and one isn't. I give the job to the citizen.

Why? They keep the money in the country, whereas immigrants usually send much of it back to their country.

I think all the countries screaming about protectionism need to take a step back and think about that word for a bit. Why wouldn't a country want to participate in protectionism during tough economic times? Each country needs to get its own house in order first.

Last edited by FEOS (2009-01-31 20:46:46)

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA

Turquoise wrote:

Strikes during a recession = fail
as opposed to when, exactly?
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6708|North Carolina

lowing wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Strikes during a recession = fail
as opposed to when, exactly?
Strikes are ok when the economy is good.

The point is that, when your economy is already headed for the shitter, the last thing you want to do is strike.  Striking should only be used when there's actually something to gain.

Striking right now won't gain you anything other than unemployment.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5889

Turquoise wrote:

lowing wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Strikes during a recession = fail
as opposed to when, exactly?
Strikes are ok when the economy is good.

The point is that, when your economy is already headed for the shitter, the last thing you want to do is strike.  Striking should only be used when there's actually something to gain.

Striking right now won't gain you anything other than unemployment.
Wait isn't there laws saying you can't fire striking workers?
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6708|North Carolina

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

lowing wrote:


as opposed to when, exactly?
Strikes are ok when the economy is good.

The point is that, when your economy is already headed for the shitter, the last thing you want to do is strike.  Striking should only be used when there's actually something to gain.

Striking right now won't gain you anything other than unemployment.
Wait isn't there laws saying you can't fire striking workers?
Uh... not here.  I don't know about the U.K. though.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5889

Turquoise wrote:

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Strikes are ok when the economy is good.

The point is that, when your economy is already headed for the shitter, the last thing you want to do is strike.  Striking should only be used when there's actually something to gain.

Striking right now won't gain you anything other than unemployment.
Wait isn't there laws saying you can't fire striking workers?
Uh... not here.  I don't know about the U.K. though.
Could have sworn there were. Learn something new everyday.
Snake
Missing, Presumed Dead
+1,046|6869|England

I fully support the strikers. Why hire labour from Italy when you can hire labour from just down the road? It doesn't make sense and it doesn't support our own country (i.e. employing our own unemployed) which is obviously a rising number, during a hard-enough time as it is.

I don't care if there's an illegal side to it or not (well, I do, but that's not my main concern), in a time of economic crisis, with unemployment rising, you don't start to reverse that by hiring foreign labour and then shipping them all the way across Europe whilst our own citizens have no jobs and are losing them each day, especially in these fields of work. Morally, its not right, given the current climate.

There was a great interview with one of the Italian workers on the BBC earlier...he couldn't even speak English. What fucking use is that to a contractor?

I like how even my own industry have got in on it, with the Corus beam mill at Teeside also on strike. That's a huge site up there, and with our industry in decline too, that will seriously impact all of our rolling programs and delivery dates (if they keep at it). Most people in my office and our factory support them too....which leads me onto:

Turquoise wrote:

The point is that, when your economy is already headed for the shitter, the last thing you want to do is strike.
2 words for you: maximum impact.
Aries_37
arrivederci frog
+368|6878|London
People should hire whoever is most capable at the job, not who is cheapest. If the prospective employee is both better qualified and cheaper though, it would be a stupid business decision to hire someone else just because this person is 'foreign'.
GateKeeper{NL}
Member
+142|6672
Italy -Man was burned because he was a Foreign r-

Russia - Attack's against Foreign  people rises-

Italy - Toscane is banning Foreign restaurants out of there town

germany - anti-semitism is rising-


Wtf is going wrong here, its like the great depression and they need to blame some one



*oftopic* I loled at the striking france peepz, lol..
Snake
Missing, Presumed Dead
+1,046|6869|England

Aries_37 wrote:

People should hire whoever is most capable at the job, not who is cheapest. If the prospective employee is both better qualified and cheaper though, it would be a stupid business decision to hire someone else just because this person is 'foreign'.
Whilst I agree with that, the current law effectively allows our own workers to get undercut, by paying for cheap foreign labour:

In 2004, a Latvian company building a school in Sweden brought in workers from its own country to do the job and paid them what they would have got if the project was in Latvia.
Swedish unions said this discriminated against Swedish workers, who would have been paid more for the doing the work under Swedish labour agreements,

...

The issue has also assumed wider significance because the UK's ageing power stations system is in urgent need of an overhaul.
Unite estimates that 60% of our power stations will have to be replaced in the next few years. It wants to take steps now to prevent future work being awarded to firms which will bring in foreign workers.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7860622.stm

With UK prices higher than most places in Europe for almost everything, that can be a serious problem...and that is just plain wrong. Furthermore, with all of those power-stations due to be replaced/updated, there is a HELL of a lot of work involved in that, something which could seriously help kickstart our construction industry again (typical power station we quoted for not long ago, was 2000tonnes of steel...our average sized job is 200-800tonnes). Multiply that by 60% of all our power stations...

That could be a lot of work, that could employ a lot of our own countries' workers, staff and labour. But for the cheap foreign labour...I doubt we (read: UK companies & labour) will even get a sniff at half of that considering the economic issues at the moment.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA

Turquoise wrote:

lowing wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Strikes during a recession = fail
as opposed to when, exactly?
Strikes are ok when the economy is good.

The point is that, when your economy is already headed for the shitter, the last thing you want to do is strike.  Striking should only be used when there's actually something to gain.

Striking right now won't gain you anything other than unemployment.
Strikes gain you nothing period.


Whatever you "won" was lost during the time you were out of work.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5889

lowing wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

lowing wrote:


as opposed to when, exactly?
Strikes are ok when the economy is good.

The point is that, when your economy is already headed for the shitter, the last thing you want to do is strike.  Striking should only be used when there's actually something to gain.

Striking right now won't gain you anything other than unemployment.
Strikes gain you nothing period.


Whatever you "won" was lost during the time you were out of work.
On a long enough time line you eventually make up for it.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6708|North Carolina

Snake wrote:

I fully support the strikers. Why hire labour from Italy when you can hire labour from just down the road? It doesn't make sense and it doesn't support our own country (i.e. employing our own unemployed) which is obviously a rising number, during a hard-enough time as it is..
That sounds good in spirit, but globalization dictates otherwise.  At this point, it's surprising you still have any manufacturing left at all in the U.K., given the costs of production.

Snake wrote:

I don't care if there's an illegal side to it or not (well, I do, but that's not my main concern), in a time of economic crisis, with unemployment rising, you don't start to reverse that by hiring foreign labour and then shipping them all the way across Europe whilst our own citizens have no jobs and are losing them each day, especially in these fields of work. Morally, its not right, given the current climate.
The only way out is to better educate your workforce.  America needs to do this as well.

Snake wrote:

There was a great interview with one of the Italian workers on the BBC earlier...he couldn't even speak English. What fucking use is that to a contractor?
See Mexicans here.  You'd be surprised what people are willing to put up with if the labor is cheaper.

Snake wrote:

I like how even my own industry have got in on it, with the Corus beam mill at Teeside also on strike. That's a huge site up there, and with our industry in decline too, that will seriously impact all of our rolling programs and delivery dates (if they keep at it). Most people in my office and our factory support them too....which leads me onto:

Turquoise wrote:

The point is that, when your economy is already headed for the shitter, the last thing you want to do is strike.
2 words for you: maximum impact.
1 word back...   outsourcing

The harder you make it for employers to do business in your country, the more likely it is that they will move to a cheaper country.  I don't like it anymore than you do, but that's how it works.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6708|North Carolina

lowing wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

lowing wrote:


as opposed to when, exactly?
Strikes are ok when the economy is good.

The point is that, when your economy is already headed for the shitter, the last thing you want to do is strike.  Striking should only be used when there's actually something to gain.

Striking right now won't gain you anything other than unemployment.
Strikes gain you nothing period.


Whatever you "won" was lost during the time you were out of work.
Look at the history of strikes.  Like anything else, it's situational.

Timing is everything.  When business is booming, strikes are generally more effective.  When times are rough, they're less effective.
Snake
Missing, Presumed Dead
+1,046|6869|England

Turquoise wrote:

Snake wrote:

I fully support the strikers. Why hire labour from Italy when you can hire labour from just down the road? It doesn't make sense and it doesn't support our own country (i.e. employing our own unemployed) which is obviously a rising number, during a hard-enough time as it is..
That sounds good in spirit, but globalization dictates otherwise.  At this point, it's surprising you still have any manufacturing left at all in the U.K., given the costs of production.
Damn globalisation. Should be banned
Agreed on the manufacturing part...its horrendous. I live just below the Midlands, so we get their news. All it ever is, is car manufacturing companies laying off workers. Fair play to Honda over at Swindon for having never made a single redundancy: they just dont allow their people to work for X amount of time, and then allow them in afterwards. They all get temp-jobs during that time, whilst receiving part pay I believe. Incredible.


Turquoise wrote:

Snake wrote:

I don't care if there's an illegal side to it or not (well, I do, but that's not my main concern), in a time of economic crisis, with unemployment rising, you don't start to reverse that by hiring foreign labour and then shipping them all the way across Europe whilst our own citizens have no jobs and are losing them each day, especially in these fields of work. Morally, its not right, given the current climate.
The only way out is to better educate your workforce.  America needs to do this as well.
I see your point...but couldn't this be a reason for manufacturing being in decline...i.e. nobody with a degree wants to work in a factory or on-site? And if they are better educated, that will probably put their costs up. Generally speaking, apart from specialist fields, foreign labour is less educated than our own workforce, due to different works of practise, standards (i.e. Eurocodes and British Standards), etc.

Turquoise wrote:

Snake wrote:

There was a great interview with one of the Italian workers on the BBC earlier...he couldn't even speak English. What fucking use is that to a contractor?
See Mexicans here.  You'd be surprised what people are willing to put up with if the labor is cheaper.
Yup, but its interesting because asylum seekers and people moving to the UK to work have to have GCSE level abilities to speak English, yet this seems to be sidestepping that...
That is my understanding, at least.

Turquoise wrote:

Snake wrote:

I like how even my own industry have got in on it, with the Corus beam mill at Teeside also on strike. That's a huge site up there, and with our industry in decline too, that will seriously impact all of our rolling programs and delivery dates (if they keep at it). Most people in my office and our factory support them too....which leads me onto:

Turquoise wrote:

The point is that, when your economy is already headed for the shitter, the last thing you want to do is strike.
2 words for you: maximum impact.
1 word back...   outsourcing

The harder you make it for employers to do business in your country, the more likely it is that they will move to a cheaper country.  I don't like it anymore than you do, but that's how it works.
Unfortunately No wonder we cannot be self-sufficient anymore.
But then...would we really outsource at this point in time, putting more people into unemployment and upsetting the economy even more? Well, probably actually, but thats another issue.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6708|North Carolina

Snake wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Snake wrote:

I fully support the strikers. Why hire labour from Italy when you can hire labour from just down the road? It doesn't make sense and it doesn't support our own country (i.e. employing our own unemployed) which is obviously a rising number, during a hard-enough time as it is..
That sounds good in spirit, but globalization dictates otherwise.  At this point, it's surprising you still have any manufacturing left at all in the U.K., given the costs of production.
Damn globalisation. Should be banned
Agreed on the manufacturing part...its horrendous. I live just below the Midlands, so we get their news. All it ever is, is car manufacturing companies laying off workers. Fair play to Honda over at Swindon for having never made a single redundancy: they just dont allow their people to work for X amount of time, and then allow them in afterwards. They all get temp-jobs during that time, whilst receiving part pay I believe. Incredible.
It sounds like you guys can relate well to Americans living in the Rust Belt (especially Detroit).

Snake wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Snake wrote:

I don't care if there's an illegal side to it or not (well, I do, but that's not my main concern), in a time of economic crisis, with unemployment rising, you don't start to reverse that by hiring foreign labour and then shipping them all the way across Europe whilst our own citizens have no jobs and are losing them each day, especially in these fields of work. Morally, its not right, given the current climate.
The only way out is to better educate your workforce.  America needs to do this as well.
I see your point...but couldn't this be a reason for manufacturing being in decline...i.e. nobody with a degree wants to work in a factory or on-site? And if they are better educated, that will probably put their costs up. Generally speaking, apart from specialist fields, foreign labour is less educated than our own workforce, due to different works of practise, standards (i.e. Eurocodes and British Standards), etc.
I'd say that's more representative of comparative advantage.  If properly educated, the U.K. (and America) has the advantage in higher skilled work like aeronautical engineering.  Obviously, not everyone can be a doctor or lawyer, but even those should be more common in your country (and mine) if you just oriented your education system more toward professional-class jobs.

Snake wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Snake wrote:

There was a great interview with one of the Italian workers on the BBC earlier...he couldn't even speak English. What fucking use is that to a contractor?
See Mexicans here.  You'd be surprised what people are willing to put up with if the labor is cheaper.
Yup, but its interesting because asylum seekers and people moving to the UK to work have to have GCSE level abilities to speak English, yet this seems to be sidestepping that...
That is my understanding, at least.
Yeah, in theory, all immigrants here have to know English too, but obviously that's not the case.

Snake wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Snake wrote:

I like how even my own industry have got in on it, with the Corus beam mill at Teeside also on strike. That's a huge site up there, and with our industry in decline too, that will seriously impact all of our rolling programs and delivery dates (if they keep at it). Most people in my office and our factory support them too....which leads me onto:


2 words for you: maximum impact.
1 word back...   outsourcing

The harder you make it for employers to do business in your country, the more likely it is that they will move to a cheaper country.  I don't like it anymore than you do, but that's how it works.
Unfortunately No wonder we cannot be self-sufficient anymore.
But then...would we really outsource at this point in time, putting more people into unemployment and upsetting the economy even more? Well, probably actually, but thats another issue.
Inevitably, it comes down to adaptation.  Education is really the only means of adapting in a rapidly globalizing economy.

Certain smaller countries seem to be ahead of the curve, like Norway, but admittedly, it's easier to better educate a small population than a large one like ours or yours.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6803|so randum
@ snake, yeah honda have been fucking amazing with regards to their workforce, i think it's full pay for a while, then part pay, and they're able to go out and get other jobs while the factories closed.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Monkey Spanker
Show it to the nice monkey.
+284|6555|England
Total(French oil company) are employing workers from around the EU so therefore is totally legit. As EU members we can work anywhere in the EU as well but the British are to bone idle to do so.
Quote of the year so far "Fifa 11 on the other hand... shiny things for mongos "-mtb0minime
https://bf3s.com/sigs/f30415b2d1cff840176cce816dc76d89a7929bb0.png
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7069|Cambridge (UK)

smuder201 wrote:

Total(French oil company) are employing workers from around the EU so therefore is totally legit. As EU members we can work anywhere in the EU as well but the British are to bone idle to do so.
It is a bit screwy that a Non-British oil company operating on British soil, can pay their Non-British employees, less than there British employees though (which is the root cause of the problems).

If there is to be equality-of-employment across the EU, then there should be equality-of-pay-for-given-job/skill/ability too.

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2009-02-03 17:02:34)

Monkey Spanker
Show it to the nice monkey.
+284|6555|England
Its not about equality of pay but saving money. Total deemed the UK workers to expensive so brought over unskilled EU workers to save money, at the end of the day it ain't about fairness but cold hard cash.



edit damn punctuation

Last edited by smuder201 (2009-02-03 17:11:12)

Quote of the year so far "Fifa 11 on the other hand... shiny things for mongos "-mtb0minime
https://bf3s.com/sigs/f30415b2d1cff840176cce816dc76d89a7929bb0.png
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6803|so randum

smuder201 wrote:

Total(French oil company) are employing workers from around the EU so therefore is totally legit. As EU members we can work anywhere in the EU as well but the British are to bone idle to do so.
It's pretty much not because of that.

1) Pay in GB is higher than most EU states

2) Due to what i'd call failings in our education system, the vast majority of employable workforce leave compulsory education without a worthwhile qualification in a European Language. Even factoring in A-Levels there isn't much interest in another language, and it gets even worse at university level.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard