BF2S Forums [Rumor] Next GTA to hit this winter?

If there's a new GTA, I think it should be a bit more un-realistic. Like in Vice City, with the chainsaws and flamethrowers, miniguns and tanks.

I want animals, like guard dogs.

And Sheep for Surgeons.

Zimmer wrote:

Dookie0119 wrote:

If there's a new GTA, I think it should be a bit more un-realistic. Like in Vice City, with the chainsaws and flamethrowers, miniguns and tanks.

I disagree. I think it should be made more realistic. With children, robbing, hostage taking and all that shizzle.

Hostage taking and human shields would be a nice improvement.

GodFather wrote:

They should make the shit world-wide...

instead of roadblocks, airports are shut down...


and plane tickets cost what they usually do

and you can fly to Paris, and London, and Tokyo and Dubai and Iraq.... [joke bout last]


that would be cool

well perhaps a bit smaller scale for the next game

how about being able to travel between liberty city, vice city, and san andreas (whether in the form of the state in GTA:SA or the way it was meant to be, as san francisco)

then move on worldwide

EDIT: also, GTA IV was the best cure for homesickness ever

Last edited by cowami (2009-01-15 09:37:30)

What was so 'realistic' about GTA4?

Apart from the cars needing a bit more skill to drive there was nothing much different.

Spidery_Yoda wrote:

I hope its far less realistic too. Crackdown and Saints Row 2 are loved by fans far more than GTA IV.

Realistic = Limiting and ultimately boring.

GTA IV has a HUUUUUUUUUGE fanbase. I have no idea what you're on about. Comparing SR2's fanbase to GTA IV's is like comparing Joan River's face to Scarlett Johansson's.

I like Godfather's idea, but I can't see it being added when they're still using DVDs. Hell, even when we're still using BDs.

Everything you could do in GTA3:SA but in the GTA4 engine.

bennisboy wrote:

jord wrote:

bennisboy wrote:

I wasnt saying it would be ps3 exclusive. Just that there isnt room to put all that extra stuff on a dvd. Yeah they might make use of the 360's install feature, but it would require more than one disk, do you really wanna swap disks while playing?

You're hardly going to have to swap disks through the most important gun battle in the game. It will be at some irrelevant point half way through I imagine.

Do I want to swap disks? Meh not bothered.

Will I swap disks for it? I'll walk 1 metre and put a new disk in to play one of my favourite series of games, yes.

What, so every time you change island, you are willing to change a disc? Think about it, you're in a plane (one of your ideas), you fly across the load line "please insert disk 2", but when flying across that load line you've gone away from your target. So you turn back "please insert disk one". Think of the number of missions where u drive back and forth. Or the number of times in SA you went from one city to another. You really wanna be up and down like a yoyo?

It works with games like MGS and FF, because its a linear progression. A free roaming sand box game would suck if you had to change disks!

I doubt a system of "Change disk every island" will be in place. They will implement it so you have to change as little as possible. That's why they making Billions of dollars, thinking outside the box.

Skiddy cars that are generally just bad to handle, horrible motorbikes, slow clunky movement, removal of all the 'fun' equipment like parachutes, fall 10 feet and die.

Etc. Bland gameplay.

Adding 'features' like rape has nothing to do with the general realism feel of the game. They can add as many realistic features as they like, as long as the core gameplay feels a lot less restricting next time.

And I still find Crackdown more fun to play than GTA IV. It's just better. And every single person i've seen compare GTA IV and SR2 says SR2 is far more fun.

Poseidon wrote:

jord wrote:

bennisboy wrote:

What, so every time you change island, you are willing to change a disc? Think about it, you're in a plane (one of your ideas), you fly across the load line "please insert disk 2", but when flying across that load line you've gone away from your target. So you turn back "please insert disk one". Think of the number of missions where u drive back and forth. Or the number of times in SA you went from one city to another. You really wanna be up and down like a yoyo?

It works with games like MGS and FF, because its a linear progression. A free roaming sand box game would suck if you had to change disks!

I doubt a system of "Change disk every island" will be in place. They will implement it so you have to change as little as possible. That's why they making Billions of dollars, thinking outside the box.

Agreed...worst they'd do is what they had in VC, have loading screens when you're switching islands.

There's no way they'd have a "change disk" system.

You'd have to change disks, they already filled up a DVD. You cant have all that extra stuff jord initially suggested, without taking up any more room on the disc! Yeah they'd make it as infrequent as possible, but when free roaming and exploring near the parts where you have to change disc, it would get damn annoyin. Say they make it so it loads in between the two islands. I'm sure you remember the boat missions in vice city where you'd keep crossing the loading line, you'd have that, but changing the disc every time! Yay fun!

Spidery_Yoda wrote:

Skiddy cars that are generally just bad to handle, horrible motorbikes, slow clunky movement, removal of all the 'fun' equipment like parachutes, fall 10 feet and die.

Etc. Bland gameplay.

Adding 'features' like rape has nothing to do with the general realism feel of the game. They can add as many realistic features as they like, as long as the core gameplay feels a lot less restricting next time.

And I still find Crackdown more fun to play than GTA IV. It's just better. And every single person i've seen compare GTA IV and SR2 says SR2 is far more fun.

Many of my friends say SR2 is more fun.

jord wrote:

bennisboy wrote:

jord wrote:

Right first off, fuck just making it for Ps3. Serves no purpose what so ever, so that's not going to happen.

Now then, Bring back Jets, Jetpacks, Tattoos, Gym, Tanks, Apache's, GUN VARIETY, more shit to do when you've completed the game, more story paths to follow rather than 2 different paths every 10 missions, Good music on radio from KNOWN artists, turf wars or variant, recruiting people into a gang, Proper wanted levels (If I just killed 100 people on the street with a machine gun I want the national guard or Army on me), more enterable buildings, more independent damage to aircraft( Oh noez my wheels snapped off I have to skid to a halt or parachute out).

Do all of them and Rockstar will make THE best game ever made.

Well thats all well and good jord. But there's this thing called "storage space" and on a dvd it is considerably smaller than on a BD, thet said they filled up the DVD for the 360 with GTA:IV, so how are they gonna add all that with no more room? Some of it maybe, not all of it

They are billion dollar companies, I'm sure they'll find a way...

Jesus Christ, some people are just fucking retarded.

This has to be the lamest excuse in history and yet I see it every day here. "They're rich so they can make this happen"

"Microsoft needs halo wars to be good, so it will be"

"Rockstar is rich so they can make DVDs as big as BDs"

"Sony's success depends on little big planet, so they can't fuck it up."

Jord, If they made GTAV for BDs, you would need 10 DVDs to play on xbox. Xbox is far more successful than PS3, not to mention Microsoft is throwing money at any developer making a game for the 360. We would prefer that it be a PS3 exclusive because they could fit more content in, but we know it's not going to happen.

Why make a better game when you'll make more money with a worse one? It's depressing, but that's the way gaming is going, it feels sort of like the Producers.