Justice... Iranian Style!

2008-11-28 08:48:22

#26

Lotta_Drool: Spit; +350|6487|Ireland

The religion of peace stri....... oh wait, they didn't kill the bitch for not marrying him, he didn't just rape her so she would get stoned to death? This guy must be a noob to the religion or something, he doesn't have to put up with shit from a woman.

WTF is up with Islam and Acid these days?

2008-11-28 08:49:51

#27

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6774

What is up with your perception of the world these days?

Is it also linked to acid, of a different kind?

You're totally ball-trippin' on Islam dude!

If good Christians can break one of the Commandments in order to serve a legal principle that is entirely in the moral/religious grey area, then you should leave the Islam-bashing and religious implications outta this!

Last edited by Uzique (2008-11-28 08:50:44)

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2008-11-28 08:56:38

#28

Lotta_Drool: Spit; +350|6487|Ireland

Uzique wrote:
then you should leave the Islam-bashing and religious implications outta this!

/fail

The story is about Islamic Law being followed. But I will throw you a bone to make you feel better.

Christianity as followed in the US has historically allowed for the killing of people convicted of crimes.

There, it has nothing to do with the story but should make you warm and fuzzy inside.

2008-11-28 08:57:14

#29

CammRobb: Banned; +1,510|6434|Carnoustie MASSIF

I agree with it, if you're a nasty enough git and you do that to someone then why not have it done back to you.

2008-11-28 08:58:10

#30

Lotta_Drool: Spit; +350|6487|Ireland

SirSchloppy wrote:
I agree with it, if you're a nasty enough git and you do that to someone then why not have it done back to you.

Even if the other person is a woman or an infidel?

2008-11-28 09:03:50

#31

CammRobb: Banned; +1,510|6434|Carnoustie MASSIF

Lotta_Drool wrote:
SirSchloppy wrote:
I agree with it, if you're a nasty enough git and you do that to someone then why not have it done back to you.
Even if the other person is a woman or an infidel?

Yes.

It's like over here, Guys get much harsher sentences for doing things than if the the woman had done them.

Also, take divorce for example, in the majority of cases the judge rules that the kids stay with the mother. When my paren'ts broke up I had to stay with my mum untill I was old enough to move out and in with my old man. The man also has to pay money to the mother, even if she is working.

2008-11-28 09:24:53

#32

PureFodder: Member; +225|6589

It's not justice, it's government enforced revenge.

The Iranian legal system really is shocking.

2008-11-28 09:27:56

#33

Lotta_Drool: Spit; +350|6487|Ireland

PureFodder wrote:
It's not justice, it's government enforced revenge.

The Iranian legal system really is shocking.

Personally, for violent crime, I support a justice system that just determines guilt or innocence and the victim gets first dibs to dole out the punishment.

2008-11-28 09:33:29

#34

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6594|Éire

At least most of the capital punishment fanboys are being consistent in this thread. I am quite conservative and hardline on the issue of crime and punishment but I always worry about sentences that are irreversible, I'd want to be 100% certain of the accused being actually guilty... were there any eye witnesses!? Ha ha, get it? ...booooom booooom!

2008-11-28 10:01:10

#35

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6709|North Carolina

SirSchloppy wrote:
Lotta_Drool wrote:
SirSchloppy wrote:
I agree with it, if you're a nasty enough git and you do that to someone then why not have it done back to you.
Even if the other person is a woman or an infidel?
Yes.

It's like over here, Guys get much harsher sentences for doing things than if the the woman had done them.

Also, take divorce for example, in the majority of cases the judge rules that the kids stay with the mother. When my paren'ts broke up I had to stay with my mum untill I was old enough to move out and in with my old man. The man also has to pay money to the mother, even if she is working.

Good points... we don't exactly have gender equality in our law system anymore than the Iranians do, but it's in the opposite direction.

In Iran, women are treated like shit. In America, a woman's word is basically taken over a man's.

Neither arrangement is very fair.

2008-11-28 12:19:15

#36

jonnykill: The Microwave Man; +235|6984

Sharia = fail. No matter what way you look at it. It's full of fail.

2008-11-28 13:48:30

#37

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi: Why walk when you can dance?; +77|6891|sWEEDen

Good sentence, this kind of punishment should be used more often, an eye for an eye. YATZY!

I can tell you this...acid in combination with eyes is really really fucking painful....I had an accident at my work 10 years ago where I got 80 degreees celsius industrial lye all over my upper body, head and into one of my eyes....that kinda stung a bit and left some marks.

Fucking genious sentance for once in Sharia laws, as previously stated, for once they actually "helped" a woman.

2008-11-28 13:57:01

#38

Ajax_the_Great1: Dropped on request; +206|6951

PureFodder wrote:
It's not justice, it's government enforced revenge.

The Iranian legal system really is shocking.

Revenge would imply going after a punishment more harsh than the crime itself. Anything equal or less is not revenge. And anything less is pussified.

2008-11-28 14:11:59

#39

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|7011|67.222.138.85

He should be shot. No equal and opposite bullshit, feed him to the dogs.

2008-11-28 14:46:13

#40

Roger Lesboules: Ah ben tabarnak!; +316|6881|Abitibi-Temiscamingue. Québec!

Flaming_Maniac wrote:
He should be shot. No equal and opposite bullshit, feed him to the dogs.

Blinded, then shot dead after. Make him feel what he have done then kill him.

2008-11-28 14:52:30

#41

{B-T}<babacanosh>: Member; +31|6906

Islamic Justice FTW

im not just saying that because i am one

2008-11-28 16:33:35

#42

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6833|Global Command

I kind of expected the woman to be punished for something she did to cause this. Perhaps a honor killing.

gg Iran.

2008-11-28 16:36:03

#43

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6749|The Land of Scott Walker

Uzique wrote:
If good Christians can break one of the Commandments in order to serve a legal principle that is entirely in the moral/religious grey area ...

What commandment would that be? And for which legal principle?

2008-11-28 16:52:08

#44

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6774

Stingray24 wrote:
Uzique wrote:
If good Christians can break one of the Commandments in order to serve a legal principle that is entirely in the moral/religious grey area ...
What commandment would that be? And for which legal principle?

Errr...

Thou shalt not kill.

The death sentence.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2008-11-29 06:00:38

#45

Max Fightmaster: Member; +2|5936

In terms of Christianity, the eye for an eye thing is outdated and from the old testament. Christ advocated turning the other cheek if I recall correctly. The entire reason that he was hailed as a great leader and role model was his progressive morality. If you throw that away he's just another Jew.

2008-11-29 06:19:03

#46

phishman420: Banned; +821|5985

I wish our justice system had the balls to do this kind of shit.

2008-11-29 06:44:01

#47

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6749|The Land of Scott Walker

Uzique wrote:
Stingray24 wrote:
Uzique wrote:
If good Christians can break one of the Commandments in order to serve a legal principle that is entirely in the moral/religious grey area ...
What commandment would that be? And for which legal principle?
Errr...

Thou shalt not kill.

The death sentence.

Thou shalt not murder, actually. The Hebrew word for kill is not used.

2008-11-29 07:19:42

#48

twoblacklines: all grown up now (its boring); +49|6511

Braddock wrote:
Court Orders Iranian Man Blinded

A court in Iran has ruled that a man who blinded a woman with acid after she spurned his marriage proposals will also be blinded with acid. The ruling was reported in Iranian newspapers on Thursday. The punishment is legal under the Islamic Sharia code of qias or equivalence, which allows retribution for violent crimes. The court also ordered the attacker, 27-year-old Majid Movahedi, to pay compensation to the victim. The ruling was a response to her plea to the court in the Iranian capital Tehran for retribution.

I read this and thought it seemed like the kind of thing lowing might agree with. What do you reckon guys?

So not only does she ruin his marriage but he has to pay her money, because she lost an eye, but also he lost an eye too.

why the compensation part !?

2008-11-29 07:27:11

#49

Bertster7: Confused Pothead; +1,101|6885|SE London

usmarine wrote:
Turquoise wrote:
Well, let me clarify... a large portion of our population would support its use far more often, but our actual officials are reluctant to use it.
so what. you cant compare the two at all. someone would not get death penalty for throwing acid on someone.

They didn't get the death penalty here.

2008-11-29 07:48:12

#50

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|6006|College Park, MD

phishman420 wrote:
I wish our justice system had the balls to do this kind of shit.

Oh but we can surely rehabilitate all the criminals!

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg

BF2S Forums Justice... Iranian Style!

Uzique wrote:

SirSchloppy wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

SirSchloppy wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

SirSchloppy wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

SirSchloppy wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Braddock wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

phishman420 wrote:

Board footer