The Bf2s SUPER_Pi 3.6GHz challenge.

2008-10-25 13:39:34

#1

menzo: ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#; +616|6446|Amsterdam‫

I was inpired by the superPI thread and a thread on a other forum
so here it is

The Bf2s SUPER_Pi 3.6GHz challenge.

To submit a score, you need SuperPI Mod 1.5XS, and CPU-Z, to confirm your clock speeds.

So it is all tweaks now. who can get the most out of his CPU and MEM and windows.

Rules

your CPU must run @ 3.6GHz
One result per system. Submitting a new score overwrites your old one.
You may submit up to five different systems.
"A system" is, in this case, defined by processor. If you've got several identical CPUs, be ready to prove it.Without a screenshot showing SuperPI and CPU-Z, your score will not be added to the chart.
I can't update the chart all the time. I do more than just watch this thread, so don't PM me. If you post a legit result, it gets added.

Sorry AMD users
and creds to Freezer for the basic layout.
I already added the scores witch are made at 3.6GHz in Freezers thread.

GOOD LUCK ALL.

INTEL	INTEL	INTEL	INTEL
1	phishman420	12.875	[email protected]
2	max	12.901	[email protected]
3	menzo2003	12.995	[email protected]
4	ghettoperson	14.165	[email protected]
5	aimless	14.406	[email protected]
6	Jussimies	14.969	[email protected]
7	twoblacklines	16.131	[email protected]
8	DeathUnlimited	17.906	[email protected]

Last edited by menzo2003 (2008-11-02 11:22:42)

https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png

2008-10-25 13:40:50

#2

Stimey: +786|6120|Ontario | Canada

I smell a rip off

2008-10-25 13:41:56

#3

menzo: ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#; +616|6446|Amsterdam‫

Stimey wrote:
I smell a rip off

YEAH it is but it about the best tweaks etc

2008-10-25 13:55:01

#4

tkoi: Utahraptor!; +148|6147|Texas

So it's basically a "who has the most expensive cpu" contest?

2008-10-25 13:58:06

#5

jaymz9350: Member; +54|6577

GGF0RCE wrote:
So it's basically a "who has the most expensive cpu" contest?

not really, At $200 my cpu is far from the most expensive and it runs at 3.6 ghz, though that's 1.2 faster than stock.

Last edited by jaymz9350 (2008-10-25 13:58:40)

2008-10-25 14:04:19

#6

tkoi: Utahraptor!; +148|6147|Texas

jaymz9350 wrote:
GGF0RCE wrote:
So it's basically a "who has the most expensive cpu" contest?
not really, At $200 my cpu is far from the most expensive and it runs at 3.6 ghz, though that's 1.2 faster than stock.

Thats not what I mean. Look at the chart. E2180 vs E8400, both at the same clock. It's pretty obvious which one is going to calculate faster.

2008-10-25 14:08:35

#7

phishman420: Banned; +821|5681

https://img512.imageshack.us/img512/6126/fkkdfdjw3.jpg

2008-10-25 14:14:04

#8

menzo: ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#; +616|6446|Amsterdam‫

GGF0RCE wrote:
jaymz9350 wrote:
GGF0RCE wrote:
So it's basically a "who has the most expensive cpu" contest?
not really, At $200 my cpu is far from the most expensive and it runs at 3.6 ghz, though that's 1.2 faster than stock.
Thats not what I mean. Look at the chart. E2180 vs E8400, both at the same clock. It's pretty obvious which one is going to calculate faster.

that is also about the cache the E8400 has more of it. I can make 2 leader boards 6mb cpu and 4mb cpu

2008-10-25 14:20:38

#9

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6453|The Twilight Zone

So all I need to do is LOWER the frequency of my CPU?

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

2008-10-25 14:20:48

#10

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6197|Winland

menzo2003 wrote:
GGF0RCE wrote:
jaymz9350 wrote:

not really, At $200 my cpu is far from the most expensive and it runs at 3.6 ghz, though that's 1.2 faster than stock.
Thats not what I mean. Look at the chart. E2180 vs E8400, both at the same clock. It's pretty obvious which one is going to calculate faster.
that is also about the cache the E8400 has more of it. I can make 2 leader boards 6mb cpu and 4mb cpu

vs 512k CPU vs 1MB CPU vs 2MB CPU vs 3MB CPU vs 4MB CPU vs 6MB CPU vs 12MB CPU

Not gonna work out.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-10-25 14:21:53

#11

menzo: ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#; +616|6446|Amsterdam‫

.Sup wrote:
So all I need to do is LOWER the frequency of my CPU?

yeah get it to 3.6 and try to get the most out of it

2008-10-25 14:44:47

#12

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6463|cuntshitlake

menzo2003 wrote:
GGF0RCE wrote:
Thats not what I mean. Look at the chart. E2180 vs E8400, both at the same clock. It's pretty obvious which one is going to calculate faster.
that is also about the cache

Besides clocks, cache matters the most when talking about core2duo's. Then memory freq and timings. I have no competition with my 1mb L2 CPU. The Q9550 I had for a while would have ripped in this, but vista 64-bit refused to run SPi.

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2008-10-25 15:39:48

#13

jaymz9350: Member; +54|6577

DeathUnlimited wrote:
menzo2003 wrote:
GGF0RCE wrote:
Thats not what I mean. Look at the chart. E2180 vs E8400, both at the same clock. It's pretty obvious which one is going to calculate faster.
that is also about the cache
Besides clocks, cache matters the most when talking about core2duo's. Then memory freq and timings. I have no competition with my 1mb L2 CPU. The Q9550 I had for a while would have ripped in this, but vista 64-bit refused to run SPi.

I have no problem running it in vista 64, though if i'm trying for the best times i use xp

and to ggforce i see what you mean now, also clock for clock the 45nm will beat the 65nm

2008-10-25 16:42:53

#14

De_Jappe: Triarii; +432|6527|Belgium

I have 13.000 flat, but cba to put pictures online at this hour

2008-10-25 16:52:24

#15

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6649

Feck. I'm going to get buttraeped with Vista.

2008-10-25 17:07:20

#16

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6567|NYC / Hamburg

safe mode

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2008-10-25 17:12:56

#17

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6649

https://xs232.xs.to/xs232/08436/3598126.jpg

How come are phishman and menzo so much faster? Something to do with the die shrink between earlier C2D's and later ones?

2008-10-25 18:06:02

#18

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6197|Winland

ghettoperson wrote:
http://xs232.xs.to/xs232/08436/3598126.jpg

How come are phishman and menzo so much faster? Something to do with the die shrink between earlier C2D's and later ones?

More efficient clock-per-clock, and more L2.

To conquer this thread, you need an E84/5/600, a kicker mobo and awesome RAM. It's all down to the FSB and RAM speed now.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-10-25 18:08:58

#19

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6649

Is 'kicker' some term all the cool kids use in Finland?

2008-10-25 18:19:02

#20

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6197|Winland

ghettoperson wrote:
Is 'kicker' some term all the cool kids use in Finland?

Don't you EVER mention sports in here AGAIN!

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-10-25 18:22:14

#21

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6567|NYC / Hamburg

https://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h297/nigelf/computer/Untitled-3.png

well that was easy. 400x9 & mem @ 1066MHz 5-5-5-15-2T

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2008-10-26 02:46:56

#22

menzo: ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#; +616|6446|Amsterdam‫

updated

2008-10-26 04:10:05

#23

menzo: ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#; +616|6446|Amsterdam‫

sub 13

https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/pi3.jpg

2008-10-26 04:13:16

#24

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6453|The Twilight Zone

max wrote:
http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h297/ … tled-3.png

well that was easy. 400x9 & mem @ 1066MHz 5-5-5-15-2T

Max you also still play Bf42? never seen you playing it when I looked at xfire. cool

2008-10-26 04:17:42

#25

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6567|NYC / Hamburg

I do. Sometimes I feel like my beloved 1942. Miranda doesn't report gaming to xfire anyways. Also I run IM on my lappy, not the gaming PC

/long explaination

in short: yes

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

BF2S Forums The Bf2s SUPER_Pi 3.6GHz challenge.

Stimey wrote:

GGF0RCE wrote:

jaymz9350 wrote:

GGF0RCE wrote:

GGF0RCE wrote:

jaymz9350 wrote:

GGF0RCE wrote:

menzo2003 wrote:

GGF0RCE wrote:

jaymz9350 wrote:

.Sup wrote:

menzo2003 wrote:

GGF0RCE wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

menzo2003 wrote:

GGF0RCE wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

max wrote:

Board footer