Word.mikkel wrote:
The most disturbing thing is that journalists in the year 2008 still manage to write "ATM machine" in their articles.
O'' that's bad.Pug wrote:
You should be beaten for trying a stunt like that...
There are angles where thats possible you know. It would require her to be on the ground. Think about it.mikkel wrote:
Also, I love how the B is mirrored, even though the supposed attacker would be looking straight down at her face. Some people are just too stupid.
Of course it's possible, but it's very unlikely.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
There are angles where thats possible you know. It would require her to be on the ground. Think about it.mikkel wrote:
Also, I love how the B is mirrored, even though the supposed attacker would be looking straight down at her face. Some people are just too stupid.
This was what made me skeptical from the moment I saw the picture. Without the image the story is plausible, given the rabid nature of some of Obama's more "enthusiatic" supporters. After the image, however, the story's believability index dropped substantially in my book. Sure, there was the possibility she took the photo hersself, using a mirror instead of the more traditional self-timer method, but I was just more skeptical than convinced after I saw it.mikkel wrote:
Also, I love how the B is mirrored, even though the supposed attacker would be looking straight down at her face. Some people are just too stupid.
lolironyReciprocity wrote:
typical racist dumb white republican bitch.
jail and public humiliation for being a dumb cunt will suffice.usmarine wrote:
but yes, she should be sent to jail for quite some time. or killed. either way the world would be better.
I'd take this fraud over the one's on the other side.Turquoise wrote:
Well, she's done a great job of creating more negative press for McCain.
Agreed.Kmarion wrote:
I'd take this fraud over the one's on the other side.
Last edited by dan673 (2008-10-24 19:37:17)
Minorities and poor people (are not the same) and deserve the right to vote just as much as you, or anybody else. To think less of them, is fascism.Reciprocity wrote:
Just imagining all these minorities and poor people(same thing) voting makes me sick. And all these college professors brainwashing their students to vote for that one.
You should learn how to properly sling that accusation.TheAussieReaper wrote:
To think less of them, is fascism.
wtf moar like the onionPoseidon wrote:
Bill Maher talking about it now:
"Today she admitted she made the whole thing up, I knew it, there's no such thing as a McCain campaign."
"Today the McCain campaign responded that they were shocked it didn't work"
"The McCain campaign has already referred to her as Joe Scratch-face"
"The Police knew she was lying because she told this outlandish tale about having money in a bank.."
lawl
Horrifically false if you speak of this situation as a general concept in colleges/universities. I am a college student, and from what I heard from my politics and history professors is an extreme liberal bias on many occasions. They don't necessarily force feed you their biased opinions on a platter, but that playfully sway their students, and put it into fatuous terms, terms that make the most sense to the common student and naturally agree. I, and 3 of my other siblings who have graduated from Ivy League schools in the U.S. can certainly account for this happening. If a professor is blatantly politically biased, why would a student bother to challenge them and risk their grade in that class? It's unfortunate, but that is the most common case.TheAussieReaper wrote:
College professors do not brainwash students. They teach students only what is relevant to the courses they undertake. They are under strict rules and guidelines and risk their very jobs if they try to sway students politically. That's less freedom than you have to discuss politics at work. I know, I'm almost finished my degree. I doubt you've ever seen higher education, or you would not make such a stupid remark.
