[Call of Duty: World at War] Specs/Collectors Edition

2008-09-26 05:17:52

#1

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6549|Long Island, New York

http://kotaku.com/5055076/call-of-duty- … stem-specs

https://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/kotaku/2008/09/cod360.jpg

What would a big holiday game be without an expensive collector's edition? It'd be nowhere, that's where. So Call of Duty: World At War will be going somewhere with this expensive box of crap limited edition collectibles, which will be available for both 360 and PC versions of the game. For $80 (360) and $70 (PC), you'll get the game, a metal box, a canteen, a week's worth of double-XP in MP and early access to a high-level weapon, which would take cheap bastards 45+ levels of hard work to unlock.

Also unveiled today are the system specs for the PC version of the game, which for XP users are quite generous:

Processor: AMD 64 3200+/Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz or better

Memory: 8 GB free hard-drive space, 512MB RAM (XP)/1GB RAM (Vista)

Graphics: Shader 3.0 or better, 256MB Nvidia GeForce 6600GT/ATI Radeon 1600XT or better

Not bad. I'm definitely getting this for PC, so I'm glad it won't be too demanding.

The week of double XP and D1A sounds good as well.

2008-09-26 05:31:18

#2

SharkyMcshark: I'll take two; +132|6797|Perth, Western Australia

Fail. World War 2 games can go hang.

Although I may pick it up later on down the line if enough of my friends say the MP is good.

Now off to set my XboX up on the big TV for Force Unleashed

Last edited by SharkyMcshark (2008-09-26 05:32:15)

2008-09-26 06:22:04

#3

Jenspm: penis; +1,716|6744|St. Andrews / Oslo

lol, $80?

That's $26 less than what the basic game will cost over here

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png

2008-09-26 08:04:50

#4

SamTheMan:D: Banned; +856|5986|England

i can see this sucking as much if not more than 4

2008-09-26 08:07:20

#5

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6164|what

SamTheMan:D wrote:
i can see this sucking as much if not more than 4

You take that back this instant.

If anything it will suck as bad if not worse than 3.

2008-09-26 08:08:47

#6

Lieutenant_Jensen: Your cops are corrupt.; +200|6403|fåking denmark

Jenspm wrote:
lol, $80?

That's $26 less than what the basic game will cost over here

Same in Denmark. Hooray for Scandinavia.

2008-09-26 11:03:58

#7

SEREVENT: MASSIVE G STAR; +605|6119|Birmingham, UK

Im not sure if i should get this on PS3 or PC...

Its a choice of HAWX on PS3 or PC, or CoD5 on PC or PS3.

Probably HAWX on PS3 and CoD5 on PC after seeing the specs though...

2008-09-26 11:05:34

#8

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6549|Long Island, New York

SEREVENT wrote:
Im not sure if i should get this on PS3 or PC...

Its a choice of HAWX on PS3 or PC, or CoD5 on PC or PS3.

Probably HAWX on PS3 and CoD5 on PC after seeing the specs though...

If you have a joystick, get HAWX on PC.

2008-09-26 11:09:18

#9

SEREVENT: MASSIVE G STAR; +605|6119|Birmingham, UK

Poseidon wrote:
SEREVENT wrote:
Im not sure if i should get this on PS3 or PC...

Its a choice of HAWX on PS3 or PC, or CoD5 on PC or PS3.

Probably HAWX on PS3 and CoD5 on PC after seeing the specs though...
If you have a joystick, get HAWX on PC.

Yeah... i don't.

2008-09-26 11:11:53

#10

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6549|Long Island, New York

SEREVENT wrote:
Poseidon wrote:
SEREVENT wrote:
Im not sure if i should get this on PS3 or PC...

Its a choice of HAWX on PS3 or PC, or CoD5 on PC or PS3.

Probably HAWX on PS3 and CoD5 on PC after seeing the specs though...
If you have a joystick, get HAWX on PC.
Yeah... i don't.

Then go buy one. They're not that expensive.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6826102204

(use for reference, ofc)

Last edited by Poseidon (2008-09-26 11:12:07)

2008-09-26 11:13:18

#11

SEREVENT: MASSIVE G STAR; +605|6119|Birmingham, UK

Poseidon wrote:
SEREVENT wrote:
Poseidon wrote:

If you have a joystick, get HAWX on PC.
Yeah... i don't.
Then go buy one. They're not that expensive.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6826102204

(use for reference, ofc)

Uhhhhhhhhh i don't have any money.

Infact, all i've got is a grand total of £11.

I need a jobbbbbbbb

2008-09-26 11:14:28

#12

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6549|Long Island, New York

SEREVENT wrote:
Poseidon wrote:
SEREVENT wrote:

Yeah... i don't.
Then go buy one. They're not that expensive.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6826102204

(use for reference, ofc)
Uhhhhhhhhh i don't have any money.

Infact, all i've got is a grand total of £11.

I need a jobbbbbbbb

Well, it comes out in January, so you have time.

2008-09-26 11:23:42

#13

_j5689_: Dreads & Bergers; +364|6728|Riva, MD

Would suck if they put an EA-style DRM into this game.

2008-09-26 11:30:53

#14

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6549|Long Island, New York

_j5689_ wrote:
Would suck if they put an EA-style DRM into this game.

Oh fuck, that's right.

If that happens, I might just contemplate getting it on the 360.

Dammit..

2008-09-26 12:42:39

#15

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6633|London, England

Poseidon wrote:
SEREVENT wrote:
Im not sure if i should get this on PS3 or PC...

Its a choice of HAWX on PS3 or PC, or CoD5 on PC or PS3.

Probably HAWX on PS3 and CoD5 on PC after seeing the specs though...
If you have a joystick, get HAWX on PC.

HAWX for consoles (they have two joysticks on them)

and CoD 5 for PC (FPS game that uses mainly bolt-action and semi-auto weapons = mouse only)

2008-09-26 12:44:36

#16

krazed: Admiral of the Bathtub; +619|6791|Great Brown North

why do so many people hate WWII games so much? i like them :\ "modern" shooters bore me with all of the automatics

2008-09-26 12:46:31

#17

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6753|FUCK UBISOFT

TheAussieReaper wrote:
SamTheMan:D wrote:
i can see this sucking as much if not more than 4
You take that back this instant.

If anything it will suck as bad if not worse than 3.

which was as bad if not worse than 4

2008-09-26 12:58:11

#18

DefCon-17: Maple Syrup Faggot; +362|6168|Vancouver | Canada

That's a fucking cool looking collector's edition.

..But I won't get it.

The game looks lame, to be honest.

2008-09-26 13:23:24

#19

S.Lythberg: Mastermind; +429|6458|Chicago, IL

why the negative attitude? just because CoD3 was bad? This game has had over double the time in production, I expect it to be similar to CoD4 in all aspects

2008-09-26 13:26:56

#20

iNeedUrFace4Soup: fuck it; +348|6557

Double exp means nothing for the pc version unless they plan to actually make exp server side this time. Also, a little longer than a week to reach max rank would be nice.

2008-09-26 13:58:13

#21

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6753|FUCK UBISOFT

S.Lythberg wrote:

why the negative attitude? just because CoD3 was bad? This game has had over double the time in production, I expect it to be similar to CoD4 in all aspects

Other than developer, setting, multiplayer, engine, etc...

2008-09-26 14:02:40

#22

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6549|Long Island, New York

Miggle wrote:
S.Lythberg wrote:

why the negative attitude? just because CoD3 was bad? This game has had over double the time in production, I expect it to be similar to CoD4 in all aspects
Other than developer, setting, multiplayer, engine, etc...

o rly?

Treyarch has had a full extra year over CoD3's development to make World at War - and it's using the excellent CoD4 engine, which is plenty of reason to be excited.

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/ar … ?id=190547

2008-09-26 14:49:08

#23

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|6855|Reykjavík, Iceland.

Jenspm wrote:
lol, $80?

That's $26 less than what the basic game will cost over here

lol same

Double XP and a super gun = fail
Metal box = ultra win.

Getting the collectors edition (if it comes out here at all) because I like metal boxes.

2008-09-26 14:52:05

#24

firebolt5: Member; +114|6167

Just going to throw this out in the thread:

GS: Speaking of COD4, that game featured one of the most robust and addicting online multiplayer modes we've seen in a while, and you've taken another page from Infinity Ward's book by including persistent ranks and stats in your own multiplayer mode. You've also added a new squad mechanic. Tell us how online squads work.

CS: Squads make it easier to play with your friends while helping to keep your team organized into groups. This is particularly fun on our large multiplayer maps.

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/callo … ot;thumb;4

2008-09-26 15:15:16

#25

specialistx2324: hahahahahhaa; +244|6700|arica harbour

those retarded shitbags in activision/treyarch ( more like gay arch) have not one single brain cell to remind them that there are way to many WWII games out there.

BF2S Forums [Call of Duty: World at War] Specs/Collectors Edition

SamTheMan:D wrote:

Jenspm wrote:

SEREVENT wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

SEREVENT wrote:

SEREVENT wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

SEREVENT wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

SEREVENT wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

SEREVENT wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

SEREVENT wrote:

_j5689_ wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

SEREVENT wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

SamTheMan:D wrote:

S.Lythberg wrote:

Miggle wrote:

S.Lythberg wrote:

Jenspm wrote:

Board footer