haha...hmmm....
>>Anyways, I think I got a real big debate coming up, and that is: advantages and disadvantages of falling on ya stomack versus standing up straight, and shooting the enemy.
Most advanced/developing/pro playes I think will say go prone...you become a smaller target, which is more difficul for the opponent to hit,...blah blah blah....
BUT!!! I choose to disagree...because...I find that when an enemy, facing me, about 20-30 meters away (30 feet?) (MEDIUM DISTANCE), or close distance, JUMPS DOWN and GOES PRONE, FIRING AT ME, it is much easier for me to concentrate my zoomless but awesome G36 whatever IN HIS FACE.< take time to think about this. When an opponent is standing up, straight up, and is fireing at you, you sort of just sight him and shoot. But when he is prone, all you see is his head on the ground, firing at you, so you naturally aim for his face and take him out much much faster cos all your bullits go into his facial. See what I mean. So if I'm right in thinking that one shot in the face kills intantly, then shouldn't you just stand tall and proud when engaging enemy because they shoot you in your torso and/or ARMOR, requiring 4-5-6 hits, while you look down at them as they lie there, and all you have to aim at is their mug, so you go rrrrrrat-rrrrat, and they are dead, and you can go patch up those fleshwounds???
see my argument? of course I know that it is always advised to aim at the face, but if you suddenly see someone semi-close, you sort of...um...shoot, aiming at their BODY, not necesserily the head, cos it'd take a split second longer if you were to zero in on their face, thus, you resulting in a state of "critical woundedness"...
what do you think?
p.s. dont bother posting is your answer is "your a noob"...
>>Anyways, I think I got a real big debate coming up, and that is: advantages and disadvantages of falling on ya stomack versus standing up straight, and shooting the enemy.
Most advanced/developing/pro playes I think will say go prone...you become a smaller target, which is more difficul for the opponent to hit,...blah blah blah....
BUT!!! I choose to disagree...because...I find that when an enemy, facing me, about 20-30 meters away (30 feet?) (MEDIUM DISTANCE), or close distance, JUMPS DOWN and GOES PRONE, FIRING AT ME, it is much easier for me to concentrate my zoomless but awesome G36 whatever IN HIS FACE.< take time to think about this. When an opponent is standing up, straight up, and is fireing at you, you sort of just sight him and shoot. But when he is prone, all you see is his head on the ground, firing at you, so you naturally aim for his face and take him out much much faster cos all your bullits go into his facial. See what I mean. So if I'm right in thinking that one shot in the face kills intantly, then shouldn't you just stand tall and proud when engaging enemy because they shoot you in your torso and/or ARMOR, requiring 4-5-6 hits, while you look down at them as they lie there, and all you have to aim at is their mug, so you go rrrrrrat-rrrrat, and they are dead, and you can go patch up those fleshwounds???
see my argument? of course I know that it is always advised to aim at the face, but if you suddenly see someone semi-close, you sort of...um...shoot, aiming at their BODY, not necesserily the head, cos it'd take a split second longer if you were to zero in on their face, thus, you resulting in a state of "critical woundedness"...
what do you think?
p.s. dont bother posting is your answer is "your a noob"...