I predict a mass suicide on these forums when people start to realize how similar these candidates really are. Did you hear him tell O'reilly that withdrawal time and numbers would depend on conditions on the ground (determined by commanders)? Gee, that sounds very familiar.usmarine wrote:
didnt o'rly talk him out of a tax cut or something?SealXo wrote:
and obama doesnt freeze up?
oh wait instead he changes his mind
yes, we all appreciate the retard perspective.War Man wrote:
The Bush Doctrine is a lie, say what you want but it is. It isn't all Bushes fault that the economy sucks. It is the major government spending from both parties that has made our economy bad.
I am not a retard, I just have different opinions than bf2s in generalReciprocity wrote:
yes, we all appreciate the retard perspective.War Man wrote:
The Bush Doctrine is a lie, say what you want but it is. It isn't all Bushes fault that the economy sucks. It is the major government spending from both parties that has made our economy bad.
The Bush doctrine isn't an opinion. The Bush Doctrine is our sitting president's stated foreign policy. Preemptive strikes on percieved enemies posing an eminent threat.War Man wrote:
I am not a retard, I just have different opinions than bf2s in generalReciprocity wrote:
yes, we all appreciate the retard perspective.War Man wrote:
The Bush Doctrine is a lie, say what you want but it is. It isn't all Bushes fault that the economy sucks. It is the major government spending from both parties that has made our economy bad.
Last edited by Reciprocity (2008-09-13 00:48:55)
Try to imagine if O'Reilly was actually a Dem with the same kind of interview tactics and he's interviewing Palin instead of Obama. Dear god, that would be a complete massacre.destruktion_6143 wrote:
she seems very condescending towards the reporter. almost like a bully. she seems very nervous and such. obama at least exhumes confidence.
ya, very interesting wasn't it? he was all for pulling out and then all of sudden things are getting better and more and more iraqis are starting to kick out al-q, he changes his "losing" tune.Kmarion wrote:
I predict a mass suicide on these forums when people start to realize how similar these candidates really are. Did you hear him tell O'reilly that withdrawal time and numbers would depend on conditions on the ground (determined by commanders)? Gee, that sounds very familiar.usmarine wrote:
didnt o'rly talk him out of a tax cut or something?SealXo wrote:
and obama doesnt freeze up?
oh wait instead he changes his mind
Hahahahahahahahahah, holy fuck, hahahahahaha.War Man wrote:
Fox News is not conservative news you know. It is way more liberal than you think.MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
The links in your post are from Fox News. Provide me something neutral, something from Wikipedia.Lotta_Drool wrote:
When you talk in a group do you sometimes notice an awkward silence and then people making excuses to leave?
Perhaps you should read the links in my post about educating yourself.
Seriously, it is edging toward liberalism. Better than liberal news only thoughMGS3_GrayFox wrote:
Hahahahahahahahahah, holy fuck, hahahahahaha.War Man wrote:
Fox News is not conservative news you know. It is way more liberal than you think.MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
The links in your post are from Fox News. Provide me something neutral, something from Wikipedia.
Gibson really pisses me off with his stupid questions, and also what is the point of watching interviews when they cut things out to make it short and make the person being interviewed look like a douchebag. Seriously pisses me off.destruktion_6143 wrote:
she seems very condescending towards the reporter. almost like a bully. she seems very nervous and such. obama at least exhumes confidence.
Liberal media's fault once again.War Man wrote:
Seriously, it is edging toward liberalism. Better than liberal news only thoughMGS3_GrayFox wrote:
Hahahahahahahahahah, holy fuck, hahahahahaha.War Man wrote:
Fox News is not conservative news you know. It is way more liberal than you think.Gibson really pisses me off with his stupid questions, and also what is the point of watching interviews when they cut things out to make it short and make the person being interviewed look like a douchebag. Seriously pisses me off.destruktion_6143 wrote:
she seems very condescending towards the reporter. almost like a bully. she seems very nervous and such. obama at least exhumes confidence.
I agree, and it's not retarded. It's truth.War Man wrote:
The Bush Doctrine is a lie, say what you want but it is. It isn't all Bushes fault that the economy sucks. It is the major government spending from both parties that has made our economy bad.
You are intimidated by strong women. Try just picturing her in her panties and she is not so bad.ATG wrote:
She kind of frightens me.
Obama is a dumbshit. Didn't you ever hear his stupid comments. "The bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor"(surely you aren't referring to the Atom bomb are you dear Obama?)Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Liberal media's fault once again.War Man wrote:
Seriously, it is edging toward liberalism. Better than liberal news only thoughMGS3_GrayFox wrote:
Hahahahahahahahahah, holy fuck, hahahahahaha.Gibson really pisses me off with his stupid questions, and also what is the point of watching interviews when they cut things out to make it short and make the person being interviewed look like a douchebag. Seriously pisses me off.destruktion_6143 wrote:
she seems very condescending towards the reporter. almost like a bully. she seems very nervous and such. obama at least exhumes confidence.
She's a moron, poor choice for VP and the nail in the GOP coffin. GG McCain. Accept it.
In the days leading up to Charles Gibson’s interview with Sarah Palin, many demanded that he ask her tough questions on foreign policy and reform. Certainly that is what journalists should do with all of our elected officials and political candidates, but it seems that Gibson doesn’t always meet this standard. Two bloggers have already provided evidence that Gibson treated Democrats much differently
http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=5000184
Obama interview
How does it feel to break a glass ceiling?
How does it feel to “win”?
How does your family feel about your “winning” breaking a glass ceiling?
Who will be your VP?
Should you choose Hillary Clinton as VP?
Will you accept public finance?
What issues is your campaign about?
Will you visit Iraq?
Will you debate McCain at a town hall?
What did you think of your competitor’s [Clinton] speech?
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09...with-abc-news/
Palin interview:
Do you have enough qualifications for the job you’re seeking? Specifically have you visited foreign countries and met foreign leaders?
Aren’t you conceited to be seeking this high level job?
Questions about foreign policy
-territorial integrity of Georgia
-allowing Georgia and Ukraine to be members of NATO
-NATO treaty
-Iranian nuclear threat
-what to do if Israel attacks Iran
-Al Qaeda motivations
-the Bush Doctrine
-attacking terrorists harbored by Pakistan
Is America fighting a holy war? [misquoted Palin]
We would have no problem with tough questioning to hold Republican candidates accountable if the media would perform the same task with Democrats. Yet no major media outlet has reported on Barack Obama’s long association with and defense of William Ayers, an unrepentant domestic terrorist, nor have they pressed him on his lack of executive experience or the absence of any significant political accomplishments except his own elections. We await that interview with great anticipation and no hope whatsoever of it ever occurring.
No, no.Reciprocity wrote:
The Bush doctrine isn't an opinion. The Bush Doctrine is our sitting president's stated foreign policy. Preemptive strikes on percieved enemies posing an eminent threat.War Man wrote:
I am not a retard, I just have different opinions than bf2s in generalReciprocity wrote:
yes, we all appreciate the retard perspective.
Your logic is so superior and has so much backing to it. Surely, nobody can debate this child!?!?War Man wrote:
Obama is a dumbshit. Didn't you ever hear his stupid comments. "The bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor"(surely you aren't referring to the Atom bomb are you dear Obama?)Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Liberal media's fault once again.War Man wrote:
Seriously, it is edging toward liberalism. Better than liberal news only though
Gibson really pisses me off with his stupid questions, and also what is the point of watching interviews when they cut things out to make it short and make the person being interviewed look like a douchebag. Seriously pisses me off.
She's a moron, poor choice for VP and the nail in the GOP coffin. GG McCain. Accept it.
Last edited by Poseidon (2008-09-13 15:29:26)
I'd imagine it was an expansion of Clinton policy. Clinton made it the official policy to remove Saddam. Or maybe even an expansion of the Carter doctrine. Carter was the President who made it official US Policy to intervene in the mideast with military force in order to ensure our oil supply.Uzique wrote:
No, no.Reciprocity wrote:
The Bush doctrine isn't an opinion. The Bush Doctrine is our sitting president's stated foreign policy. Preemptive strikes on percieved enemies posing an eminent threat.War Man wrote:
I am not a retard, I just have different opinions than bf2s in general
Preemptive strikes and attacks are actually legal and semi-justified.
The Bush Doctrine as laid out in the National Security Council documents states preventative warfare. That's a whole different ballgame.
You're not arguing the fact that Obama has inserted foot in mouth in epic fashion several times are you?Poseidon wrote:
Your logic is so superior and has so much backing to it. Surely, nobody can debate this child!?!?War Man wrote:
Obama is a dumbshit. Didn't you ever hear his stupid comments. "The bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor"(surely you aren't referring to the Atom bomb are you dear Obama?)Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Liberal media's fault once again.
She's a moron, poor choice for VP and the nail in the GOP coffin. GG McCain. Accept it.
no stupid it was bush. all bush. god kerry.Kmarion wrote:
I'd imagine it was an expansion of Clinton policy. Clinton made it the official policy to remove Saddam. Or maybe even an expansion of the Carter doctrine. Carter was the President who made it official US Policy to intervene in the mideast with military force in order to ensure our oil supply.Uzique wrote:
No, no.Reciprocity wrote:
The Bush doctrine isn't an opinion. The Bush Doctrine is our sitting president's stated foreign policy. Preemptive strikes on percieved enemies posing an eminent threat.
Preemptive strikes and attacks are actually legal and semi-justified.
The Bush Doctrine as laid out in the National Security Council documents states preventative warfare. That's a whole different ballgame.
How could I? Every politician does.Stingray24 wrote:
You're not arguing the fact that Obama has inserted foot in mouth in epic fashion several times are you?Poseidon wrote:
Your logic is so superior and has so much backing to it. Surely, nobody can debate this child!?!?War Man wrote:
Obama is a dumbshit. Didn't you ever hear his stupid comments. "The bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor"(surely you aren't referring to the Atom bomb are you dear Obama?)