Pages: 1 2 3 4

 

2008-07-03 11:20:27
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6844|Texas - Bigger than France

imortal wrote:

Pug wrote:

But ironically, he's been conviceted of rape and sentenced to a few thousand years of rape.
I think they call that poetic justice.

Pug wrote:

......just like Iran...no queers here and we have oil, except we do have more guns.
Talk about stereotypes!  You've been watching too many old movies.  Austin is one of the most gay-friendly cities in the country.

More guns AND more pickup trucks.
Yeah I know.  I'm only 3 hours away in CC, Tx.  Plus I've been to a gay wedding in Dallas...except it was a "commitment ceremony".  Same as a regular wedding IMO...I thought it would be, you know, more "gay".  The only real weird thing was that the lady pastor who married them was dancing with her fem-bot partner at the reception.

Last edited by Pug (2008-07-03 11:20:53)

2008-07-03 11:31:11
zeidmaan
Member
+234|6717|Vienna

crazy Muslims never stop amazing me... wait wat?
2008-07-03 12:02:02
d4rkst4r
biggie smalls
+72|6755|Ontario, Canada
thats the american count system for yah
"you know life is what we make it, and a chance is like a picture, it'd be nice if you just take it"
2008-07-03 14:59:37
FallenMorgan
Member
+53|6216|Glendale, CA
Don't hold your breath, he'll be eligable for parole in 3402 AD.
2008-07-03 16:06:51
The#1Spot
Member
+105|6842|byah
I wonder how heavy of a penalty if the gender was turned around? I think about 10years maybe 11.
2008-07-03 16:08:22
imortal
Member
+240|6967|Austin, TX

The#1Spot wrote:

I wonder how heavy of a penalty if the gender was turned around? I think about 10years maybe 11.
Most likely true.  Especially if she was hot.
2008-07-03 16:10:49
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6923|London, England

imortal wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:

I wonder how heavy of a penalty if the gender was turned around? I think about 10years maybe 11.
Most likely true.  Especially if she was hot.
Why would three teenage boys even report being raped by a hot chick, why would it even be classified as rape or a crime

WHY
2008-07-03 16:12:56
Thorax
Banned
+77|6106

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

imortal wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:

I wonder how heavy of a penalty if the gender was turned around? I think about 10years maybe 11.
Most likely true.  Especially if she was hot.
Why would three teenage boys even report being raped by a hot chick, why would it even be classified as rape or a crime

WHY
Because it is.  Most people with no game tend to find these types of things unexplainable.  But yeah, it's wrong.
2008-07-03 16:14:56
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6923|London, England

Thorax wrote:

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

imortal wrote:


Most likely true.  Especially if she was hot.
Why would three teenage boys even report being raped by a hot chick, why would it even be classified as rape or a crime

WHY
Because it is.  Most people with no game tend to find these types of things unexplainable.  But yeah, it's wrong.
No game?

What are you insinuating, you Mountain Lion.

I think I can vouch for alot of people when I say that it isn't wrong.
2008-07-03 16:18:16
Thorax
Banned
+77|6106

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

Thorax wrote:

Mek-Stizzle wrote:


Why would three teenage boys even report being raped by a hot chick, why would it even be classified as rape or a crime

WHY
Because it is.  Most people with no game tend to find these types of things unexplainable.  But yeah, it's wrong.
No game?

What are you insinuating, you Mountain Lion.

I think I can vouch for alot of people when I say that it isn't wrong.
Because rape is rape.  If you don't want to have sex with someone you don't have to and when you are forced that is wrong.  If the boys hadn't had a problem with it, this story would have never seen the light of day.  Obviously they did, therefore it is a crime. 

I say you have no game because you would have a problem with being raped if you did.  Also, you be able to go get it when you pleased instead of hoping to be raped by a "hot chick".  In which case it wouldn't be rape anymore now would it?
2008-07-03 16:22:39
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6923|London, England

Thorax wrote:

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

Thorax wrote:

Because it is.  Most people with no game tend to find these types of things unexplainable.  But yeah, it's wrong.
No game?

What are you insinuating, you Mountain Lion.

I think I can vouch for alot of people when I say that it isn't wrong.
If the boys hadn't had a problem with it, this story would have never seen the light of day.  Obviously they did, therefore it is a crime.
What boys, what crime. I thought this was a hypothetical situation. If they did report it, then they're gay.

I say you have no game because you would have a problem with being raped if you did.  Also, you be able to go get it when you pleased instead of hoping to be raped by a "hot chick".  In which case it wouldn't be rape anymore now would it?
I never said I'd hope to get raped by a hot chick (according to you, because i'm desperate/virgin/have no game), I just said if It happened I probably wouldn't report it or classify myself as a rape victim

You ruin all the jokes you do
2008-07-03 16:24:41
Thorax
Banned
+77|6106

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

Thorax wrote:

Mek-Stizzle wrote:


No game?

What are you insinuating, you Mountain Lion.

I think I can vouch for alot of people when I say that it isn't wrong.
If the boys hadn't had a problem with it, this story would have never seen the light of day.  Obviously they did, therefore it is a crime.
What boys, what crime. I thought this was a hypothetical situation. If they did report it, then they're gay.

I say you have no game because you would have a problem with being raped if you did.  Also, you be able to go get it when you pleased instead of hoping to be raped by a "hot chick".  In which case it wouldn't be rape anymore now would it?
I never said I'd hope to get raped by a hot chick (according to you, because i'm desperate/virgin/have no game), I just said if It happened I probably wouldn't report it or classify myself as a rape victim

You ruin all the jokes you do
Busted
2008-07-03 20:21:03
deeznutz1245
Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.
+483|6795|Connecticut

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

rammunition wrote:

Its kind of stupid. Why give him such a ridiculously long sentence. I understand that they don't want him out of prison, but giving him something like 80 years would have been enough to keep him there indefinitely. When a sentence like 4060 years comes out, it makes the judicial system look childish.
Exactly.  They should have just said it was life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Because a life sentence is only a 20 year term. That would mean he is on the streets again at the age of 61. Also, the court must remain consistent with its sentencing. It must sentence him equally for each crime or else the defense may provide an appeal stating one crime outweighed the other in penalty thus making the crimes non equivilant. That could be grounds for a mistrial beleive it or not and would result in a re-trial. In lamans terms they covered their ass.
Malloy must go
2008-07-03 20:30:06
Wallpaper
☺
+303|6296|The pool

HurricaИe wrote:

It takes forever for people, even if they're 110% guilty to actually get executed.

Anyway, I should become a judge and be the first to give someone a sentence of over 9,000 years.


Dont forget they treat cancer and various other life threatening diseases that the people on DEATH row have
My flickr
2008-07-03 20:31:17
HurricaИe
Banned
+877|6263|Washington DC

deeznutz1245 wrote:

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

rammunition wrote:

Its kind of stupid. Why give him such a ridiculously long sentence. I understand that they don't want him out of prison, but giving him something like 80 years would have been enough to keep him there indefinitely. When a sentence like 4060 years comes out, it makes the judicial system look childish.
Exactly.  They should have just said it was life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Because a life sentence is only a 20 year term. That would mean he is on the streets again at the age of 61. Also, the court must remain consistent with its sentencing. It must sentence him equally for each crime or else the defense may provide an appeal stating one crime outweighed the other in penalty thus making the crimes non equivilant. That could be grounds for a mistrial beleive it or not and would result in a re-trial. In lamans terms they covered their ass.
Why is a life sentence only 20 years?
2008-07-03 20:36:30
imortal
Member
+240|6967|Austin, TX

HurricaИe wrote:

deeznutz1245 wrote:

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:


Exactly.  They should have just said it was life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Because a life sentence is only a 20 year term. That would mean he is on the streets again at the age of 61. Also, the court must remain consistent with its sentencing. It must sentence him equally for each crime or else the defense may provide an appeal stating one crime outweighed the other in penalty thus making the crimes non equivilant. That could be grounds for a mistrial beleive it or not and would result in a re-trial. In lamans terms they covered their ass.
Why is a life sentence only 20 years?
Don't ask me, but a 'life' sentence is generally considered to be 20 years.  Most likely a holdover from British Common Law, but that is only a guess.
2008-07-03 20:36:50
Mutantbear
Semi Constructive Criticism
+1,431|6267|London, England

Has this source been confirmed? OmgFAUXnews doesn't sound very reliable considering it has FAKE right in the name
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ https://i.imgur.com/Xj4f2.png
2008-07-04 00:14:44
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6408|eXtreme to the maX
Anyone proven guilty via dna and sentenced to more years than they are expected to live should be executed.
I'd much rather know they're rotting in prison.
Fuck Israel
2008-07-04 00:23:22
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7131|Grapevine, TX

Mutantsteak wrote:

Has this source been confirmed? OmgFAUXnews doesn't sound very reliable considering it has FAKE right in the name
/ face palm... yes I originally found it on Fox News. Proudly. the whole fauxnews thing is sarcism, found somewhere on the internet.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co … 03759.html

Dilbert_X wrote:

Anyone proven guilty via dna and sentenced to more years than they are expected to live should be executed.
I'd much rather know they're rotting in prison.
do you even pay taxes?
2008-07-04 00:30:00
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6408|eXtreme to the maX
Yes I pay taxes.
Prisons should be run very different.

Either 1 guard per 100 prisoners - the better ones are allowed out to cook and wash clothes, any trouble and they're in their cell 24/7.

Or they can do hard miserable labour, like picking up broken glass in the desert 12 hrs a day. I'd pay for that.
Fuck Israel
2008-07-04 00:55:32
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7131|Grapevine, TX

Dilbert_X wrote:

Yes I pay taxes.
Prisons should be run very different.

Either 1 guard per 100 prisoners - the better ones are allowed out to cook and wash clothes, any trouble and they're in their cell 24/7.

Or they can do hard miserable labor, like picking up broken glass in the desert 12 hrs a day. I'd pay for that.
are you 19 1/2?? you make it assumptive that you know a lot of knowledge about prison operations.    like when you say 1 guard for 100 prisoners.
they already have inmates that cook and clean. what are you debating again? Oh yeah, you would rather spend your tax money on child rapists, to keep them caged like the animals they are. call me an evil conservative hate monger that wants to put a bullet in his brain and end his miserable existence on this planet. he hasn't done  anything to contribute. but that's why there are people like me, to balance things out.
2008-07-05 07:35:08
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6953|USA

(T)eflon(S)hadow wrote:

omgfauxnews.com wrote:

WEATHERFORD, Texas  —  A man was sentenced to more than 4,000 years in prison Wednesday for sexually assaulting three teenage girls over two years.

A day after finding James Kevin Pope guilty, jurors sentenced him to 40 life prison terms — one for each sex assault conviction — and 20 years for each of the three sexual performance of a child convictions.

At the request of prosecutors, state District Judge Graham Quisenberry ordered Pope to serve the sentences consecutively, adding up to 4,060 years. He will be eligible for parole in the year 3209, according to the Parker County District Attorney's Office.

"We believe it was a just result," prosecutor Robert DuBoise said, adding that he was "overwhelmed" with the judge's decision to stack the sentences.

Pope, 43, abused the girls for nearly two years. It came to authorities' attention earlier this year after Pope made several inappropriate comments to a friend, who notified Child Protective Services.

During the trial, the teens testified about the abuse, and their sexually explicit photographs were shown as evidence.

But Rick Alley, Pope's defense lawyer, told jurors in closing arguments that the victims were incapable of understanding what happened, the Weatherford Democrat reported in its Wednesday online edition.

"If it was as traumatic as they indicate, they would be able to give you (specific dates and times of the incidents). Simply because it's shocking doesn't make it true," Alley said.

During the sentencing phase of the trial, a U.S. Secret Service agent testified that while examining Pope's home computer, he found more than 200 images of child porn.

Later Wednesday, some jurors said the case was difficult because of the subject matter.

"We were careful not to make any mistakes in viewing and evaluating the evidence," said juror Dale Lewis.
Makes me proud to be a Texan!
wow, TX is getting soft, I woulda thought they woulda gave him life in prison.
2008-07-05 08:25:27
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6707|North Carolina
It kind of makes you wonder why things like this happen, yet serial killers get much lesser sentences.  Sex > murder?

A little consistency in punishments would be nice.
2008-07-05 11:27:42
deeznutz1245
Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.
+483|6795|Connecticut

Turquoise wrote:

It kind of makes you wonder why things like this happen, yet serial killers get much lesser sentences.  Sex > murder?

A little consistency in punishments would be nice.
Because if you fuck children you are worse than anything.
Malloy must go
2008-07-05 12:37:27
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6485|Ireland

ATG wrote:

Anyone proven guilty via dna and sentenced to more years than they are expected to live should be executed.
They should be gifted to the department of defense to test the effects of new weapons on.

 

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard