Maybe other countries don't go Yipikaye like Bruce Willis.Kmarion wrote:
Maybe it's because the majority of the world is not fighting? At least not proportionately.m3thod wrote:
Why does the US always seem to have a disproportionately large blue on blue incidents?
...........Cowboy mentality?
Last edited by sergeriver (2008-06-11 07:42:54)
Exactly, sure all those Mooslims are made entirely out of towel, they're not real people!m3thod wrote:
If its not american deaths who gives a shit right?....
A feeling of terror doesn't class it as terrorism or a terrorist act, that would make every war ever fought, or even light street killings terrorist acts. I don't understand this whole 'cowardly' label the Pakistani govenrment's throwing out, that's more like something you use to label an enemy than an ally who accidentally hit some of your men.Braddock wrote:
Exactly, sure all those Mooslims are made entirely out of towel, they're not real people!m3thod wrote:
If its not american deaths who gives a shit right?....
And for all those saying it's not a terror attack because it was an accident and it was not done on purpose yadda, yadda, yadda...I'm sure those 11 Pakistanis had a certain feeling of terror just prior to being blown to bits by that US bomb; I don't think they would have had enough time to check up the modern dictionary definition of the word though.
One thing seems to be clear in modern politics: it's okay to kill people as long you didn't mean it.
lots of friendly Iraqi soldiers and police officers have killed American troops by accident. I myself recall two occasions where I was nearly killed by friendly iraqis doing their job. it happens. you dont hear much about it because its war and its expected.Braddock wrote:
'US strike deaths' anger Pakistan
"Pakistan's military has condemned what it says was an air strike by US-led forces that killed 11 Pakistani troops as a "cowardly attack". Details of the incident on the border with Afghanistan are still unclear. Reports suggest it took place as US-led forces operating in Afghanistan were tackling pro-Taleban militants. The US military confirmed it had carried out the operation, which comes amid rising tensions between the US and Pakistan militaries. The soldiers' deaths occurred overnight at a border post in the Mohmand region, one of Pakistan's tribal areas, across the border from Afghanistan's Kunar province."
I'd like to see what kind of reaction would result if 11 US troops were accidentally killed by 'friendly' Pakistani fire.
Right. But doing it now is wrong because...................?David.P wrote:
It's not just the christians that killed civilians in those ways. Mongols, Persians, and Muslims aswell. Hell every Ancient-Mid evil society did so.ZombieVampire! wrote:
Would you prefer they celebrated by slaughtering civilians en masse, like Christian crusaders?
The leftists said so..... Now why are they going back on their word?ZombieVampire! wrote:
Right. But doing it now is wrong because...................?David.P wrote:
It's not just the christians that killed civilians in those ways. Mongols, Persians, and Muslims aswell. Hell every Ancient-Mid evil society did so.ZombieVampire! wrote:
Would you prefer they celebrated by slaughtering civilians en masse, like Christian crusaders?
Last edited by rammunition (2008-06-11 10:01:46)
To be fair I don't think this incident deliberately sought to kill Pakistani troops...but the fact does remain that once again people are being blown to bits because of American foreign interference.rammunition wrote:
I must update my list
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=98872&p=1
one thing about America is, they bomb "third world countries" such as Pakistan and somalia, but don't have the balls to attack China and Russia as they know they will be off the map (rightfully). They think they are "tough" for killing people of countries they know who cannot defend themselves.
You got to love Pakistan's response, tough and direct, Don't submit to America Pakistan, great attitude from them
it may have been an accident but America has a great record when it comes to "friendly fire", especially in Iraq/Afghanistan. either they are not thought properly who their allies are or they are just stupid.Braddock wrote:
To be fair I don't think this incident deliberately sought to kill Pakistani troops...but the fact does remain that once again people are being blown to bits because of American foreign interference.rammunition wrote:
I must update my list
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=98872&p=1
one thing about America is, they bomb "third world countries" such as Pakistan and somalia, but don't have the balls to attack China and Russia as they know they will be off the map (rightfully). They think they are "tough" for killing people of countries they know who cannot defend themselves.
You got to love Pakistan's response, tough and direct, Don't submit to America Pakistan, great attitude from them
Or they thought about the opportunity of taking out the Taleban target and decided the Pakistani's were expendable.rammunition wrote:
it may have been an accident but America has a great record when it comes to "friendly fire", especially in Iraq/Afghanistan. either they are not thought properly who their allies are or they are just stupid.Braddock wrote:
To be fair I don't think this incident deliberately sought to kill Pakistani troops...but the fact does remain that once again people are being blown to bits because of American foreign interference.rammunition wrote:
I must update my list
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=98872&p=1
one thing about America is, they bomb "third world countries" such as Pakistan and somalia, but don't have the balls to attack China and Russia as they know they will be off the map (rightfully). They think they are "tough" for killing people of countries they know who cannot defend themselves.
You got to love Pakistan's response, tough and direct, Don't submit to America Pakistan, great attitude from them
This attack is only going to breed more extremists as i read a report on the BBC as many Pakistanis are angry, what people tend to not realise is injustice breeds extremismBraddock wrote:
Or they thought about the opportunity of taking out the Taleban target and decided the Pakistani's were expendable.rammunition wrote:
it may have been an accident but America has a great record when it comes to "friendly fire", especially in Iraq/Afghanistan. either they are not thought properly who their allies are or they are just stupid.Braddock wrote:
To be fair I don't think this incident deliberately sought to kill Pakistani troops...but the fact does remain that once again people are being blown to bits because of American foreign interference.
Erm ok, you do realise that Pakistan has a sizeable nuclear stockpile right?rammunition wrote:
I must update my list
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=98872&p=1
one thing about America is, they bomb "third world countries" such as Pakistan and somalia, but don't have the balls to attack China and Russia as they know they will be off the map (rightfully). They think they are "tough" for killing people of countries they know who cannot defend themselves.
You got to love Pakistan's response, tough and direct, Don't submit to America Pakistan, great attitude from them
Own'dM.O.A.B wrote:
Erm ok, you do realise that Pakistan has a sizeable nuclear stockpile right?rammunition wrote:
I must update my list
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=98872&p=1
one thing about America is, they bomb "third world countries" such as Pakistan and somalia, but don't have the balls to attack China and Russia as they know they will be off the map (rightfully). They think they are "tough" for killing people of countries they know who cannot defend themselves.
You got to love Pakistan's response, tough and direct, Don't submit to America Pakistan, great attitude from them
Besides there was really only one country holding back the USSR in the Cold War and that was the US, no other Western country had the capabilities to hold off a Russian attack. The bombing 'third world countries' part is just labelling for the sake of labelling, the terrorist groups happen to operate from third world countries, so I guess bombing a first or second world country would be a good plan eh?
Pakistan is hardly a 3rd world country.rammunition wrote:
I must update my list
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=98872&p=1
one thing about America is, they bomb "third world countries" such as Pakistan and somalia, but don't have the balls to attack China and Russia as they know they will be off the map (rightfully). They think they are "tough" for killing people of countries they know who cannot defend themselves.
You got to love Pakistan's response, tough and direct, Don't submit to America Pakistan, great attitude from them
Bloody is. I've been there.FatherTed wrote:
Pakistan is hardly a 3rd world country.rammunition wrote:
I must update my list
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=98872&p=1
one thing about America is, they bomb "third world countries" such as Pakistan and somalia, but don't have the balls to attack China and Russia as they know they will be off the map (rightfully). They think they are "tough" for killing people of countries they know who cannot defend themselves.
You got to love Pakistan's response, tough and direct, Don't submit to America Pakistan, great attitude from them
yeah, but there was an update to Pakistani 1.5 from Pakistani 3.0b after bush was selected President of the United Sheep of America.m3thod wrote:
Bloody is. I've been there.FatherTed wrote:
Pakistan is hardly a 3rd world country.rammunition wrote:
I must update my list
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=98872&p=1
one thing about America is, they bomb "third world countries" such as Pakistan and somalia, but don't have the balls to attack China and Russia as they know they will be off the map (rightfully). They think they are "tough" for killing people of countries they know who cannot defend themselves.
You got to love Pakistan's response, tough and direct, Don't submit to America Pakistan, great attitude from them
who cares? I'll go there in the summer and they'll all tell me bush is a goat fucker and blair should suck his dick for a living....about 10000 times.Lotta_Drool wrote:
yeah, but there was an update to Pakistani 1.5 from Pakistani 3.0b after bush was selected President of the United Sheep of America.m3thod wrote:
Bloody is. I've been there.FatherTed wrote:
Pakistan is hardly a 3rd world country.
Last edited by m3thod (2008-06-11 13:57:14)
The best way to deal with trolls is not acknowledge that they exist.God Save the Queen wrote:
rammunition is the reason why this place is a joke and not to be taken seriously.
You wish you went Yipikaye mutha fucka...lolsergeriver wrote:
Maybe other countries don't go Yipikaye like Bruce Willis.Kmarion wrote:
Maybe it's because the majority of the world is not fighting? At least not proportionately.m3thod wrote:
Why does the US always seem to have a disproportionately large blue on blue incidents?
...........Cowboy mentality?
I've never seen an American say "yipikaye" seriously. That's just in the movies. And believe it or not, DieHard is NOT a documentary.sergeriver wrote:
Maybe other countries don't go Yipikaye like Bruce Willis.Kmarion wrote:
Maybe it's because the majority of the world is not fighting? At least not proportionately.m3thod wrote:
Why does the US always seem to have a disproportionately large blue on blue incidents?
...........Cowboy mentality?
/threadATG wrote:
You guys need to stop being simpletons.
Pakistani troops where either killed by accident or because they were chilling with terrorist.
Shit happens, its war.
