BF2S Forums Entire US Marines V 100 SAS soldiers.

Spetznaz would rape them all.

HurricaИe wrote:

jord wrote:

HurricaИe wrote:

Barrett XM109 does

And dude, it'd be like Operation Gothic Serpent. Army Rangers and Delta Force (very well trained) versus a shitload of Somalis. The Somalis lost way more men but still ended up killing 17 Army soldiers, and forced a retreat. And these guys had Blackhawks, Littlebirds etc.

There was a mission.

In my hypothetical scenario, there is no mission but to eliminate the enemy.

Then the Marines would still win. Again, if they moved in huge groups I doubt the SAS would last very long. Not because of superior training or anything, but because they'd be outnumbered as fuck.

Wiki says there are 186K active duty Marines and 40K reserve Marines. That's almost 230K Marines.

Versus 100 SAS? The Marines would undoubtedly win.

Guerilla warfare. Think a four man team sniping for a hill a mile away. Think bombs, claymores, traps.

And reserves don't count.

jord wrote:

HurricaИe wrote:

jord wrote:

There was a mission.

In my hypothetical scenario, there is no mission but to eliminate the enemy.

Then the Marines would still win. Again, if they moved in huge groups I doubt the SAS would last very long. Not because of superior training or anything, but because they'd be outnumbered as fuck.

Wiki says there are 186K active duty Marines and 40K reserve Marines. That's almost 230K Marines.

Versus 100 SAS? The Marines would undoubtedly win.

Guerilla warfare. Think a four man team sniping for a hill a mile away. Think bombs, claymores, traps.

And reserves don't count.

The Marines obviously don't have snipers, claymores, etc.

You're delusional if you think 100 people could kill off 186,000 (one hundred and eighty six thousand) people.

more interesting would be 100 SAS / SBS vs 100 SEALS / Green berets

Sgtslutter > All Special Forces.

HurricaИe wrote:

jord wrote:

HurricaИe wrote:

Then the Marines would still win. Again, if they moved in huge groups I doubt the SAS would last very long. Not because of superior training or anything, but because they'd be outnumbered as fuck.

Wiki says there are 186K active duty Marines and 40K reserve Marines. That's almost 230K Marines.

Versus 100 SAS? The Marines would undoubtedly win.

Guerilla warfare. Think a four man team sniping for a hill a mile away. Think bombs, claymores, traps.

And reserves don't count.

The Marines obviously don't have snipers, claymores, etc.

You're delusional if you think 100 people could kill off 186,000 (one hundred and eighty six thousand) people.

Hey c'mon there Hurricane, the ratio is only 1860 : 1.

It would be a piece of cake if they had nuke.

Zimmer wrote:

jord wrote:

dayarath wrote:

Sorry to dissapoint you but SAS is overrated. The marines are an incredibly strong fighting force, and no 100 man special forces group in the world would be able to stand a chance, if it's jungle warfare I guess they're just going to mow the trees down with 25mm rounds at the start, also spraying fire in a direction where you think enemy forces are is pretty succesfull in wooded areas.

What infantry weapon fires 25mm rounds?


SAS overrated my ass. In Sierra Leone they killed 40+ enemies and lost just 1 man. In the Iranian embassy siege they killed 5 captured 1 and lost no men. That's just 2 operations.

It's hilarious to see how all of you brits are so damn full of yourselves.

"Oh, we have the best Special Forces in the world. That makes us better than you."

You would lose. So badly, it wouldn't even be funny.

Do you have any idea how many marines there are compared to 100 SAS soldiers?

You would get annihilated.

People dying is never funny. Unless you know of some situation when it is...

jord wrote:

People dying is never funny. Unless you know of some situation when it is...

And here I was thinking you were the grammatical intellectual.

Jord, your argument here holds no grounds whatsoever. Leave now and maybe you can be reserved some respect after saying the most ridiculous bullshit I have ever seen in an argument. This is what happens when you are in denial, thinking your country is so awesome.

Currently living in rape, murder and knife capital of Europe, I can tell you right now it isn't.

jord wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Spetznaz would rape them all.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main … do0501.xml

The operation was aimed to be "clinical" and to assassinate the president with a minimum of what the Americans would call "collateral damage". It quickly turned into a nightmare of confusion and incompetence: members of the Spetsnaz teams (several of them had been assigned to the task) attacked in the dark, and then failed to recognise who was firing at whom - with the result that they ended up shooting each other, inflicting horrendous casualties on their own side.

Wow awesome.

Have you heard of this brand new thing that has spread all over Internet? It's called sarcasm.

jord wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Spetznaz would rape them all.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main … do0501.xml

The operation was aimed to be "clinical" and to assassinate the president with a minimum of what the Americans would call "collateral damage". It quickly turned into a nightmare of confusion and incompetence: members of the Spetsnaz teams (several of them had been assigned to the task) attacked in the dark, and then failed to recognise who was firing at whom - with the result that they ended up shooting each other, inflicting horrendous casualties on their own side.

Wow awesome.

Isn't it ironic that the article was made by the British?

NooBesT wrote:

jord wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Spetznaz would rape them all.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main … do0501.xml

The operation was aimed to be "clinical" and to assassinate the president with a minimum of what the Americans would call "collateral damage". It quickly turned into a nightmare of confusion and incompetence: members of the Spetsnaz teams (several of them had been assigned to the task) attacked in the dark, and then failed to recognise who was firing at whom - with the result that they ended up shooting each other, inflicting horrendous casualties on their own side.

Wow awesome.

Have you heard of this brand new thing that has spread all over Internet? It's called sarcasm.

I must have heard of it as the very post you quoted contained sarcasm from me...

SAS. why? you forget the brits are the former colinal power in burma. thety know the lay of the land. whta would probabyl ahppen is hta thhe marines would be flused out by the populace, and the SAS could kill the lot.

kptk92 wrote:

I think I would win out of the lot of them, seeing as the SAS employed me, and I said "dun wry guise taek a braek" so they did and I just picked them all off using my leet sniper rifle

if you had been in the SAS, you'd know that they aren't allowed to admit they are, so i don't believe you. ( check the wikipedia article on the SAS. they are boudn by law not to say they are in the SAS. yhe books by ex-SAS men are under psedonyms)