Last edited by trippy982 (2008-02-07 17:32:35)
lol...again...trippy982 wrote:
Supporting troops that spawn supporting wars with laserbeams attached...
EDIT: ok... this is getting old...
um... i guess the laserbeams scares me most...
Dummie. If you support the troops you are just supporting what they do for your country. Supporting the war is completely different. If you support the soldiers, you support what they are doing. Supporting the war is supporting the stupid choices of the president.trippy982 wrote:
Supporting troops that spawn supporting wars with laserbeams attached...
EDIT: ok... this is getting old...
um... i guess the laserbeams scares me most...
lol wut?ThaReaper wrote:
Dummie. If you support the troops you are just supporting what they do for your country. Supporting the war is completely different. If you support the soldiers, you support what they are doing. Supporting the war is supporting the stupid choices of the president.trippy982 wrote:
Supporting troops that spawn supporting wars with laserbeams attached...
EDIT: ok... this is getting old...
um... i guess the laserbeams scares me most...
If you support what they are doing, which is fighting a war, then that means you support war... no?ThaReaper wrote:
If you support the soldiers, you support what they are doing.
Well, not in my opinion. Because most soldiers want to help protect the country. That doesn't mean they want to go to war. I can't really explain it.Ryan wrote:
If you support what they are doing, which is fighting a war, then that means you support war... no?ThaReaper wrote:
If you support the soldiers, you support what they are doing.
And the ultimate way to bring every soldier home, is to end the war.RedTwizzler wrote:
I've said it a million times:
What better way is there to support the troops than to bring them home alive to their families from a land of sand and roadside explosives?
Or win the war...whatever that is.Ryan wrote:
And the ultimate way to bring every soldier home, is to end the war.RedTwizzler wrote:
I've said it a million times:
What better way is there to support the troops than to bring them home alive to their families from a land of sand and roadside explosives?
Last edited by trippy982 (2008-02-07 17:55:27)
That isn't going to happen with Bush as our president.Ryan wrote:
And the ultimate way to bring every soldier home, is to end the war.RedTwizzler wrote:
I've said it a million times:
What better way is there to support the troops than to bring them home alive to their families from a land of sand and roadside explosives?
don't worry, bush won't be in office long, be prepared to give hilary a warm welcome...ThaReaper wrote:
That isn't going to happen with Bush as our president.Ryan wrote:
And the ultimate way to bring every soldier home, is to end the war.RedTwizzler wrote:
I've said it a million times:
What better way is there to support the troops than to bring them home alive to their families from a land of sand and roadside explosives?
I'm sure she'll be allowed to speak at Obama's Inauguraltrippy982 wrote:
don't worry, bush won't be in office long, be prepared to give hilary a warm welcome...ThaReaper wrote:
That isn't going to happen with Bush as our president.Ryan wrote:
And the ultimate way to bring every soldier home, is to end the war.
No. I support them in that I hope they all come home safe and sound, and as soon as possible.Ryan wrote:
If you support what they are doing, which is fighting a war, then that means you support war... no?ThaReaper wrote:
If you support the soldiers, you support what they are doing.
The only way to win the war might be to support it. Help get it over as soon as possible with a victory outcome. That way, our troops are home, with satisfaction of winning a war. But extending the time it takes to win this war means thousands more soldiers killed.trippy982 wrote:
Or win the war...whatever that is.Ryan wrote:
And the ultimate way to bring every soldier home, is to end the war.RedTwizzler wrote:
I've said it a million times:
What better way is there to support the troops than to bring them home alive to their families from a land of sand and roadside explosives?
Ok, serious business. If we end the war by bringing the soldiers home now, does that mean we lost the war. Put a tally on wars USA lost? Sucks to lose...but sucks more to gamble someone else's life on something that has no purpose.
Thousands is a bit of an overstatement honestly. IMO, and in the opinion of many servicemen I've talked to, they'd rather win the war at the cost of some more casualties and possibly themselves than to lose. Definitely a parallel to the 'Leave no man behind' and 'Death before dishonor' attitudes of the US Military. (IMO both attitudes are good things)Ryan wrote:
The only way to win the war might be to support it. Help get it over as soon as possible with a victory outcome. That way, our troops are home, with satisfaction of winning a war. But extending the time it takes to win this war means thousands more soldiers killed.trippy982 wrote:
Or win the war...whatever that is.Ryan wrote:
And the ultimate way to bring every soldier home, is to end the war.
Ok, serious business. If we end the war by bringing the soldiers home now, does that mean we lost the war. Put a tally on wars USA lost? Sucks to lose...but sucks more to gamble someone else's life on something that has no purpose.
What if it turns out into another world war? More than a few thousand will die.Ghandi767 wrote:
Thousands is a bit of an overstatement honestly. IMO, and in the opinion of many servicemen I've talked to, they'd rather win the war at the cost of some more casualties and possibly themselves than to lose. Definitely a parallel to the 'Leave no man behind' and 'Death before dishonor' attitudes of the US Military. (IMO both attitudes are good things)Ryan wrote:
The only way to win the war might be to support it. Help get it over as soon as possible with a victory outcome. That way, our troops are home, with satisfaction of winning a war. But extending the time it takes to win this war means thousands more soldiers killed.trippy982 wrote:
Or win the war...whatever that is.
Ok, serious business. If we end the war by bringing the soldiers home now, does that mean we lost the war. Put a tally on wars USA lost? Sucks to lose...but sucks more to gamble someone else's life on something that has no purpose.
Last edited by Ryan (2008-02-07 18:07:31)