Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

LaidBackNinja wrote:

My point is that there is NOT enough food to go around. The current system is NOT working. People are starving over there.

GS:
Who gives a shit what it's called. It's not about semantics. It's about people not getting food and fucking dying because of it.

http://media.npr.org/programs/newsnotes … 200_lg.jpg
Children starving and dying is sad but it has nothing to do with a lack of available resources.
It has something to do with the way those resources are distributed, but you can't deny that our current system is wasteful and certainly doesn't make things easier. If everyone just ate meat once or twice a week instead of with every meal, and the raising of livestock went down accordingly, world hunger could be solved instantly.
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell