I have a roulette system, but is it worth it?

2008-01-27 08:35:50

#1

Ninja_Kid2002: Member; +119|6269|Floodsville, TN, (UK really)

Ok, firstly, if you don't believe what I'm about to say, please don't post on this thread, but:

I've found a system that seems to always win on roulette.
I've been practising it on free online tables and it has worked, so I just signed up to an online real-money casino site to try it out.
I've won $66 (£33) in 30 minutes playing and i've never gone below my original deposit.

The problem is, by the system I use (which I'm not going to tell you! ) I can only win $1 at a time, so it's quite a slow process. (The reason is because of the table limits, but I'm not going to go into that!)

So my question is: Is $132 an hour worth it?

What say you forums?

2008-01-27 08:38:21

#2

BlackKoala: Member; +215|6327

You don't always bet the same color and DD when you lose, right?

2008-01-27 08:39:31

#3

adam1503: Member; +85|6390|Manchester, UK

$132 (~£66) an hour sounds worth it to me...

Last edited by adam1503 (2008-01-27 08:39:46)

2008-01-27 08:43:58

#4

DesertFox-: The very model of a modern major general; +794|6686|United States of America

Well you can make that your full time job and do pretty well if it's a guaranteed win.

$132 /hr x 40 hours / week (as if it were a 9 to 5 job) x 52 weeks / year = $274,560 / year.

I'm sure you'd like much better to do something else.

2008-01-27 08:44:06

#5

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6531|Global Command

At lol @ " sure system " for roulette.

2008-01-27 08:44:58

#6

Shocking: sorry you feel that way; +333|6001|...

Ninja_Kid2002 wrote:
Ok, firstly, if you don't believe what I'm about to say, please don't post on this thread, but:

I've found a system that seems to always win on roulette.
I've been practising it on free online tables and it has worked, so I just signed up to an online real-money casino site to try it out.
I've won $66 (£33) in 30 minutes playing and i've never gone below my original deposit.

The problem is, by the system I use (which I'm not going to tell you! ) I can only win $1 at a time, so it's quite a slow process. (The reason is because of the table limits, but I'm not going to go into that!)

So my question is: Is $132 an hour worth it?

What say you forums?

quit your job and do that 8 hours a day instead.

8x132 = 1056 euros a day

that's fucking much.

inane little opines

2008-01-27 08:46:02

#7

jord: Member; +2,382|6680|The North, beyond the wall.

I can't imagine you've found it. If there is a sure win system, which I'm struggling to believe. It was probably discovered a very long time ago.

2008-01-27 08:46:52

#8

Aries_37: arrivederci frog; +368|6577|London

If it folows something like http://www.nyrd.net/Strategy%20guide%20 … ulette.pdf have fun getting unlucky and losing 6 hours of winnings in one go AFAIK there is no surefire way to win roulette consistently.

2008-01-27 08:47:10

#9

_PQWeR_AuRoRa_olly: Member; +22|6512|Surrey, United Kingdom

yeah mate it is worth it... but they will pick up on a system you may use pretty quick if they are regularly losing money to you.

2008-01-27 08:47:24

#10

gbr.hitman: Fair Play!; +21|6602|Warwickshire, England

At a guess you use the double up system?

2008-01-27 09:02:34

#11

bennisboy: Member; +829|6648|Poundland

Aries_37 wrote:
If it folows something like http://www.nyrd.net/Strategy%20guide%20 … ulette.pdf have fun getting unlucky and losing 6 hours of winnings in one go AFAIK there is no surefire way to win roulette consistently.

That system is so flawed, as the chance of any of the sections is always 1/3 (not including 0), the chance of one section coming up isnt actually affected by the last roll

2008-01-27 09:05:09

#12

CanadianLoser: Meow :3 :3; +1,148|6509

pm me the system.

2008-01-27 09:06:32

#13

Ninja_Kid2002: Member; +119|6269|Floodsville, TN, (UK really)

Well, like I said, I'm not going to say what the system is, but as you pointed out, there's no way I was the first person to think of it, since I'm not all that clever!

I read the casino rules, and there's nothing in there about being allowed to kick you for winning, or for using a system, only for using "robots" as they call it. Since I'm using brain power it can't be all that bad.

But under what conditions are they likely to ban me from playing:
A) Using a recognised system
B) Winning too much
C) Using identified betting patterns

I'm pretty nervous about it as I don't gamble ever since I know the house always wins, so i'm being really cautious.

2008-01-27 09:06:38

#14

ig: This topic seems to have no actual posts; +1,199|6524

yes it's worth it, and i'll need that info

2008-01-27 09:10:36

#15

gbr.hitman: Fair Play!; +21|6602|Warwickshire, England

The only guaranteed way to not lose on roulette is to 'double up', but it don't always work online because the tables are fixed and there are bet limits.

2008-01-27 09:12:31

#16

Ninja_Kid2002: Member; +119|6269|Floodsville, TN, (UK really)

Aries_37 wrote:
If it folows something like http://www.nyrd.net/Strategy%20guide%20 … ulette.pdf have fun getting unlucky and losing 6 hours of winnings in one go AFAIK there is no surefire way to win roulette consistently.

That's the worst system ever. It's totally based on the "Gambler's Fallacy" that each event effects the next, but the roulette ball doesn't remember where it landed last spin.

Awful, awful system.

gbr.hitman wrote:
The only guaranteed way to not lose on roulette is to 'double up', but it don't always work online because the tables are fixed and there are bet limits.

You're talking about the Martingale system, which is disproven pretty well here

Last edited by Ninja_Kid2002 (2008-01-27 09:18:48)

2008-01-27 09:18:44

#17

Shocking: sorry you feel that way; +333|6001|...

and i'll need that system btw pm

inane little opines

2008-01-27 09:19:13

#18

BlackKoala: Member; +215|6327

then post your system so everyone here can disprove it in ten seconds with math.

2008-01-27 09:23:00

#19

Ninja_Kid2002: Member; +119|6269|Floodsville, TN, (UK really)

BlackKoala wrote:
then post your system so everyone here can disprove it in ten seconds with math.

I'm pretty sure I can disprove my system, and I hate people who claim they can beat casinos, because we all know it's not possible, otherwise everyone would do it.

It just seems to be working for me right now, I really posted this because I was scared that I'd missed something, I think I've found the answer I was looking for.

2008-01-27 09:24:16

#20

ig: This topic seems to have no actual posts; +1,199|6524

Ninja_Kid2002 wrote:
BlackKoala wrote:
then post your system so everyone here can disprove it in ten seconds with math.
I'm pretty sure I can disprove my system, and I hate people who claim they can beat casinos, because we all know it's not possible, otherwise everyone would do it.

It just seems to be working for me right now, I really posted this because I was scared that I'd missed something, I think I've found the answer I was looking for.

that's why you play poker. no house advantage.

2008-01-27 09:24:35

#21

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6567|Area 51

dayarath wrote:
Ninja_Kid2002 wrote:
Ok, firstly, if you don't believe what I'm about to say, please don't post on this thread, but:

I've found a system that seems to always win on roulette.
I've been practising it on free online tables and it has worked, so I just signed up to an online real-money casino site to try it out.
I've won $66 (£33) in 30 minutes playing and i've never gone below my original deposit.

The problem is, by the system I use (which I'm not going to tell you! ) I can only win $1 at a time, so it's quite a slow process. (The reason is because of the table limits, but I'm not going to go into that!)

So my question is: Is $132 an hour worth it?

What say you forums?
quit your job and do that 8 hours a day instead.

8x132 = 1056 euros a day

that's fucking much.

Dollars is not euro's 1056 dollars is around 650 euro's. Still alot of money for one day.

2008-01-27 09:26:07

#22

_j5689_: Dreads & Bergers; +364|6718|Riva, MD

Yes, do it, and congrats for finding it.

2008-01-27 09:27:07

#23

Shocking: sorry you feel that way; +333|6001|...

RDMC wrote:
dayarath wrote:
Ninja_Kid2002 wrote:
Ok, firstly, if you don't believe what I'm about to say, please don't post on this thread, but:

I've found a system that seems to always win on roulette.
I've been practising it on free online tables and it has worked, so I just signed up to an online real-money casino site to try it out.
I've won $66 (£33) in 30 minutes playing and i've never gone below my original deposit.

The problem is, by the system I use (which I'm not going to tell you! ) I can only win $1 at a time, so it's quite a slow process. (The reason is because of the table limits, but I'm not going to go into that!)

So my question is: Is $132 an hour worth it?

What say you forums?
quit your job and do that 8 hours a day instead.

8x132 = 1056 euros a day

that's fucking much.
Dollars is not euro's 1056 dollars is around 650 euro's. Still alot of money for one day.

oh.. he said dollars.

that makes it less attractive, still alot though.

inane little opines

2008-01-27 09:28:30

#24

gbr.hitman: Fair Play!; +21|6602|Warwickshire, England

Ninja_Kid2002 wrote:
Aries_37 wrote:
If it folows something like http://www.nyrd.net/Strategy%20guide%20 … ulette.pdf have fun getting unlucky and losing 6 hours of winnings in one go AFAIK there is no surefire way to win roulette consistently.
That's the worst system ever. It's totally based on the "Gambler's Fallacy" that each event effects the next, but the roulette ball doesn't remember where it landed last spin.

Awful, awful system.

gbr.hitman wrote:
The only guaranteed way to not lose on roulette is to 'double up', but it don't always work online because the tables are fixed and there are bet limits.
You're talking about the Martingale system, which is disproven pretty well here

Actually it doesn't disprove it, because if you had enough money you are always guaranteed to win. The only way you can lose is if you run out of money and for you to run out of money the roulette table would have to land on the same colour for 100's of times in a row (depending on how much money you have to start with). Anyway, my 'double up' system is slightly differen't to the method explained in your link.

2008-01-27 09:30:47

#25

Ninja_Kid2002: Member; +119|6269|Floodsville, TN, (UK really)

gbr.hitman wrote:
Ninja_Kid2002 wrote:
Aries_37 wrote:
If it folows something like http://www.nyrd.net/Strategy%20guide%20 … ulette.pdf have fun getting unlucky and losing 6 hours of winnings in one go AFAIK there is no surefire way to win roulette consistently.
That's the worst system ever. It's totally based on the "Gambler's Fallacy" that each event effects the next, but the roulette ball doesn't remember where it landed last spin.

Awful, awful system.

gbr.hitman wrote:
The only guaranteed way to not lose on roulette is to 'double up', but it don't always work online because the tables are fixed and there are bet limits.
You're talking about the Martingale system, which is disproven pretty well here
Actually it doesn't disprove it, because if you had enough money you are always guaranteed to win. The only way you can lose is if you run out of money and for you to run out of money the roulette table would have to land on the same colour for 100's of times in a row (depending on how much money you have to start with). Anyway, my 'double up' system is slightly differen't to the method explained in your link.

Except that all roulette tables have a maximum bet limit

BF2S Forums I have a roulette system, but is it worth it?

Ninja_Kid2002 wrote:

Aries_37 wrote:

Aries_37 wrote:

gbr.hitman wrote:

BlackKoala wrote:

Ninja_Kid2002 wrote:

BlackKoala wrote:

dayarath wrote:

Ninja_Kid2002 wrote:

RDMC wrote:

dayarath wrote:

Ninja_Kid2002 wrote:

Ninja_Kid2002 wrote:

Aries_37 wrote:

gbr.hitman wrote:

gbr.hitman wrote:

Ninja_Kid2002 wrote:

Aries_37 wrote:

gbr.hitman wrote:

Board footer