Wow...very mature.CameronPoe wrote:
You did. Look at my sig - I've quoted your exact words with context added in square brackets.
Hahaha. Best post in D&ST ever!usmarine2005 wrote:
Wow...very mature.CameronPoe wrote:
You did. Look at my sig - I've quoted your exact words with context added in square brackets.
And when in comparison to Saddam and Hitler I stand by that. Of course, your quote will not show the context of the discussion. Good job at setting the example of a "respected" and "mature" HOF member. I strive to be like you.
Well you are a HOFr too, how are you setting the example?usmarine2005 wrote:
Wow...very mature.CameronPoe wrote:
You did. Look at my sig - I've quoted your exact words with context added in square brackets.
And when in comparison to Saddam and Hitler I stand by that. Of course, your quote will not show the context of the discussion. Good job at setting the example of a "respected" and "mature" HOF member. I strive to be like you.
"Fuck you all. And fuck you ATG that was not the point. Close the fucking thread. Fucking cunts."usmarine2005 wrote:
Wow...very mature.CameronPoe wrote:
You did. Look at my sig - I've quoted your exact words with context added in square brackets.
And when in comparison to Saddam and Hitler I stand by that. Of course, your quote will not show the context of the discussion. Good job at setting the example of a "respected" and "mature" HOF member. I strive to be like you.
Yes...awesome contribution also. Another well behaved member. I change my vote to you.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Hahaha. Best post in D&ST ever!
Yes...and I do not hide it. What is your point? I do not pretend to be better than anyone like you do.CameronPoe wrote:
"Fuck you all. And fuck you ATG that was not the point. Close the fucking thread. Fucking cunts."
The thead was fine until you guys set it off track.sergeriver wrote:
Well you are a HOFr too, how are you setting the example?
well actually, the colonies backed up the brits to the sea, the french just cut off their escape route. Also the French only shoed up after the colonists proved they actually had a chance to win..sergeriver wrote:
It took a day to the French to defeat the Brits in the Battle of Chesapeak giving you guys the chance to get your independence. you should speak French.lowing wrote:
Maybe, but at least it took longer than a summer vacation..sergeriver wrote:
No, it's ok. In fact the Brits kicked our butts, like they did with the about to be born US until the French helped them.
Are you serious? At least I can debate. All you do is spout off one liners. I've got no bans and 2 AWMs. How about you?usmarine2005 wrote:
Yes...awesome contribution also. Another well behaved member. I change my vote to you.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Hahaha. Best post in D&ST ever!
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-01-27 16:42:46)
You are there because of the French. Deal with it.lowing wrote:
well actually, the colonies backed up the brits to the sea, the french just cut off their escape route. Also the French only shoed up after the colonists proved they actually had a chance to win..sergeriver wrote:
It took a day to the French to defeat the Brits in the Battle of Chesapeak giving you guys the chance to get your independence. you should speak French.lowing wrote:
Maybe, but at least it took longer than a summer vacation..
And you consider that a contribution what you said up there? I just want an example so I can be like you.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Are you serious? At least I can debate. All you do is spout off one liners. I've got no bans and 2 AWMs. How about you?usmarine2005 wrote:
Yes...awesome contribution also. Another well behaved member. I change my vote to you.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Hahaha. Best post in D&ST ever!
I was just pointing out an 'awesome contribution'.usmarine2005 wrote:
Yes...and I do not hide it. What is your point? I do not pretend to be better than anyone like you do.CameronPoe wrote:
"Fuck you all. And fuck you ATG that was not the point. Close the fucking thread. Fucking cunts."
ummmmmmmm I am sorry, what is an "AWM"?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Are you serious? At least I can debate. All you do is spout off one liners. I've got no bans and 2 AWMs. How about you?usmarine2005 wrote:
Yes...awesome contribution also. Another well behaved member. I change my vote to you.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Hahaha. Best post in D&ST ever!
And I never deny it. What is wrong with you? I do not pretend like you do.CameronPoe wrote:
I was just pointing out an 'awesome contribution'.usmarine2005 wrote:
Yes...and I do not hide it. What is your point? I do not pretend to be better than anyone like you do.CameronPoe wrote:
"Fuck you all. And fuck you ATG that was not the point. Close the fucking thread. Fucking cunts."
I've got 3 bans, one perm, and a Bn AWMs.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Are you serious? At least I can debate. All you do is spout off one liners. I've got no bans and 2 AWMs. How about you?usmarine2005 wrote:
Yes...awesome contribution also. Another well behaved member. I change my vote to you.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Hahaha. Best post in D&ST ever!
PS - Not in the HOF. Don't really care about it to be honest - it's not like the bar's set very high for it anyway.
Automated warning message.lowing wrote:
ummmmmmmm I am sorry, what is an "AWM"?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Are you serious? At least I can debate. All you do is spout off one liners. I've got no bans and 2 AWMs. How about you?usmarine2005 wrote:
Yes...awesome contribution also. Another well behaved member. I change my vote to you.
What you should get every time you start a thread against poor people, Muslims, appeasers and Liberals, lol.lowing wrote:
ummmmmmmm I am sorry, what is an "AWM"?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Are you serious? At least I can debate. All you do is spout off one liners. I've got no bans and 2 AWMs. How about you?usmarine2005 wrote:
Yes...awesome contribution also. Another well behaved member. I change my vote to you.
USM, you've contributed to the derailment of this thread just as much as anyone else you call out. If I wanted I'm quite sure I can find numerous examples of your lack of contribution to many threads. The fact of the matter is, you call people out when you are guilty of the same offense.usmarine2005 wrote:
And you consider that a contribution what you said up there? I just want an example so I can be like you.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Are you serious? At least I can debate. All you do is spout off one liners. I've got no bans and 2 AWMs. How about you?usmarine2005 wrote:
Yes...awesome contribution also. Another well behaved member. I change my vote to you.
I have 0 bans and 0 AWMS (whatever that is) and i've been here 7 months although i never really noticed debate...i liked my stats! lol.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Are you serious? At least I can debate. All you do is spout off one liners. I've got no bans and 2 AWMs. How about you?usmarine2005 wrote:
Yes...awesome contribution also. Another well behaved member. I change my vote to you.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Hahaha. Best post in D&ST ever!
PS - Not in the HOF. Don't really care about it to be honest - it's not like the bar's set very high for it anyway.
I don't pretend anything. I don't think I'm better than anyone. I know my posts generally make a lot more logical sense than yours do though.usmarine2005 wrote:
And I never deny it. What is wrong with you? I do not pretend like you do.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-01-27 16:50:23)
How many countries supported it and gave us intel? How many democrats including Clinton said Saddam must be taken out? Jesus you think it was just Bush or something.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
The invasion surprised Saddam - interesting. It still doesn't give credit to the fact that the "evidence" in going to war was weak, misrepresented, and there was a definite agenda in the push for war.
Words don't kill people. Bad decisions certainly do.usmarine2005 wrote:
How many countries supported it and gave us intel? How many democrats including Clinton said Saddam must be taken out? Jesus you think it was just Bush or something.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
The invasion surprised Saddam - interesting. It still doesn't give credit to the fact that the "evidence" in going to war was weak, misrepresented, and there was a definite agenda in the push for war.
You make decisions off of intel given to you. One man / country can not do it all.sergeriver wrote:
Words don't kill people. Bad decisions certainly do.usmarine2005 wrote:
How many countries supported it and gave us intel? How many democrats including Clinton said Saddam must be taken out? Jesus you think it was just Bush or something.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
The invasion surprised Saddam - interesting. It still doesn't give credit to the fact that the "evidence" in going to war was weak, misrepresented, and there was a definite agenda in the push for war.
He had the same intel than Clinton, yet he decided on his own to invade Iraq.usmarine2005 wrote:
You make decisions off of intel given to you. One man / country can not do it all.sergeriver wrote:
Words don't kill people. Bad decisions certainly do.usmarine2005 wrote:
How many countries supported it and gave us intel? How many democrats including Clinton said Saddam must be taken out? Jesus you think it was just Bush or something.
That reminds me of this cool video.sergeriver wrote:
Words don't kill people. Bad decisions certainly do.usmarine2005 wrote:
How many countries supported it and gave us intel? How many democrats including Clinton said Saddam must be taken out? Jesus you think it was just Bush or something.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
The invasion surprised Saddam - interesting. It still doesn't give credit to the fact that the "evidence" in going to war was weak, misrepresented, and there was a definite agenda in the push for war.