BF2S Forums Interrogator: Invasion Surprised Saddam

Stingray24 wrote:

Don't make me post the unanimous UN resolution again ...

What will that do?  Make my point about the international community taking action instead of the U.S. more valid?  Our politicians make the case for invasion in the U.N., support and constantly point to the numerous resolutions passed against Iraq, yet don't want to wait for international support, instead electing to go after Iraq with our "Coalition of the Willing".

Would you like me to post the resolutions against Israel that condemn them?  We sure do give those a lot of weight.  Double standards.

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Saddam had just as much right to have WMDs as we do.

lol... except for the fact he gassed women and children in his own country.

WMD suck.

http://www.uiowa.edu/~policult/assets/V … m_phuc.jpg

I wouldn't class napalm as a WMD.

usmarine2005 wrote:

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

Piro added that Saddam had the intention of restarting an Iraqi weapons program at the time, and had engineers available for chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.

Hmmmm....interesting.  Guess he was going to make WMD's after all.

Nah, he was going to ask Rummy some.

Last edited by sergeriver (2008-01-27 14:51:12)

Maybe we should stay on the topic of how a lot of peoples assumptions on here were incorrect.

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Maybe we should stay on the topic of how a lot of peoples assumptions on here were incorrect.

Like Bush?

Ummm...no

rdx-fx wrote:

ooh!  whatzis?!  nope.. can't possibly be one of those mythical chemical scuds Saddam had.
Looks like it's seen better days.
http://www.vlar.net/bf2s/Dead.Scud.01.jpg

here, have a few links detailing Saddam's use of WMDs;

http://www.kdp.se/old/chemical.html
http://www.worldthreats.com/middle_east … eapons.htm
http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stori … ads03.html
http://www.gendercide.org/case_anfal.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_poison_gas_attack
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Anfal_Campaign

I'm not posting pics of chemical weapons victims.  One, not a fan of the Banhammer.  Two, I'm pretty sure more of you would actually get off on them, rather than the intended effect of shocking some reality into you.

Do your own google work.  "Chemical Ali" "Anfal Campaign" "Halabja".
This wasn't one incident.  This was a systematic program of genocide by Saddam.

Now, who didn't have any WMDs?

This is quite possibly the most irrelevant post I have seen in quite some time on this forum. You do realise that we all know that Saddam used to have WMD and that the west sold them to him and that the west didn't so much as raise an eyebrow when he gassed the Kurds at Halabja?

Posting facts and links to information on pre-1991 Iraqi weapons programs is entirely irrelevant in the context of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Thorough inspections of his military capabilities took place between then and 1998 and all of the inspectors were confident that the programs had all but been eradicated, as was proved to be the case when the US failed to find any functional WMD following their misguided invasion. Why are you posting such irrelevant information?

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-01-27 15:08:48)

usmarine2005 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Why are you posting such irrelevant information?

Says the man who posted Vietnam pics....

You posted a reference to gassing and generally inhumane military activity, I did likewise. kthx

usmarine2005 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Says the man who posted Vietnam pics....

You posted a reference to gassing and generally inhumane military activity, I did likewise. kthx

That was not military what Saddam did.  Not even close.  There was no war.  Sorry, but that failed Cam.

Who did provide him the WMD?

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Who did provide him the WMD?

It was meant to deter Iran and you know it.  Stop with this stupid shit for once.

It was wrong and you know it.  Would you give WMD to Ahmadinejad?

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

It was meant to deter Iran and you know it.  Stop with this stupid shit for once.

It was wrong and you know it.  Would you give WMD to Ahmadinejad?

Well hello serge, I will not say it is wrong since I do not know what the world would be like if Iran took over Iraq back then.

Tell that to the Kurds Saddam killed.  Cmon.

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Tell that to the Kurds Saddam killed.  Cmon.

So you want to blame Germans for producing scientists who made nukes?  Jesus christ.

No, smart ass, but you don't give a knife to a wacko.  Duh.

usmarine2005 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Says the man who posted Vietnam pics....

You posted a reference to gassing and generally inhumane military activity, I did likewise. kthx

That was not military what Saddam did.  Not even close.  There was no war.  Sorry, but that failed Cam.

Using napalm on villages in Vietnam wasn't very 'military' either.

usmarine2005 wrote:

Well hello serge, I will not say it is wrong since I do not know what the world would be like if Iran took over Iraq back then.

lol. usmarine has a rather novel take on history! Apparently Iran invaded Iraq and not the other way around!!!