No these "Christians" go against the teaching of Jesus. The radical Muslims are following the teaching of Muhammad exactlyadam1503 wrote:
And so not representative of their religions as a whole?lowing wrote:
Actually we don't: I believe Islamic terror is just that Islamic terror. I believe these Christian nutcases are just that Christian nutcases.
These christians follow a particular interpretation of the Bible, just as the radical Muslims follow a particular interpretation of the Quran.lowing wrote:
No these "Christians" go against the teaching of Jesus. The radical Muslims are following the teaching of Muhammad exactlyadam1503 wrote:
And so not representative of their religions as a whole?lowing wrote:
Actually we don't: I believe Islamic terror is just that Islamic terror. I believe these Christian nutcases are just that Christian nutcases.
these people are following the wrong interpretation of the Bible, specifically, they are taking the old testament without the new testament. and because the only part where it talks about gay people is in Genesis they're following Torah... so they're Jewish loladam1503 wrote:
These christians follow a particular interpretation of the Bible, just as the radical Muslims follow a particular interpretation of the Quran.lowing wrote:
No these "Christians" go against the teaching of Jesus. The radical Muslims are following the teaching of Muhammad exactlyadam1503 wrote:
And so not representative of their religions as a whole?
Ummmmm, these people ARE NOT following the teachings of Jesus......The radicals ARE following the teachings of Islam. It is the moderates who are not following Islam as it is taught by the prophet Muhammad.adam1503 wrote:
These christians follow a particular interpretation of the Bible, just as the radical Muslims follow a particular interpretation of the Quran.lowing wrote:
No these "Christians" go against the teaching of Jesus. The radical Muslims are following the teaching of Muhammad exactlyadam1503 wrote:
And so not representative of their religions as a whole?
You're insane. Really.lowing wrote:
Ummmmm, these people ARE NOT following the teachings of Jesus......The radicals ARE following the teachings of Islam. It is the moderates who are not following Islam as it is taught by the prophet Muhammad.adam1503 wrote:
These christians follow a particular interpretation of the Bible, just as the radical Muslims follow a particular interpretation of the Quran.lowing wrote:
No these "Christians" go against the teaching of Jesus. The radical Muslims are following the teaching of Muhammad exactly
You say that the moderates aren't following their own religion?
And you would know... how?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/koran.htmlSpark wrote:
You're insane. Really.lowing wrote:
Ummmmm, these people ARE NOT following the teachings of Jesus......The radicals ARE following the teachings of Islam. It is the moderates who are not following Islam as it is taught by the prophet Muhammad.adam1503 wrote:
These christians follow a particular interpretation of the Bible, just as the radical Muslims follow a particular interpretation of the Quran.
You say that the moderates aren't following their own religion?
And you would know... how?
I can read, hear and see. Please explain how the moderates are following the teachings of a man who he himself lopped off over 600 heads?
muhammad spread islam himself by killing... it's funny how people say it's a religion of peace, and then they put down Christianity even though we spread our faith from 3000 to 3 million in 200 years, all this done non-violently.Spark wrote:
You're insane. Really.lowing wrote:
Ummmmm, these people ARE NOT following the teachings of Jesus......The radicals ARE following the teachings of Islam. It is the moderates who are not following Islam as it is taught by the prophet Muhammad.adam1503 wrote:
These christians follow a particular interpretation of the Bible, just as the radical Muslims follow a particular interpretation of the Quran.
You say that the moderates aren't following their own religion?
And you would know... how?
http://www.evilbible.com/January.htmlowing wrote:
http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/koran.html
I can read, hear and see. Please explain how the moderates are following the teachings of a man who he himself lopped off over 600 heads?
See? I too can pick and choose evidence to support the idea that Christianity is a violent and intolerant religion. These quotes clearly show that Christianity is inherently hostile and intolerant towards others...
But wait, didnt we just agree that Christianity as it is observed by the majority is a peaceful and tolerant religion?
So you can see that by picking and choosing the evidence I can sway the argument against Christianity being peaceful, as you have done against Islam.
Nothin an a-10 can't solve.
You do realize you are quoting the old testamant and not the new testament.... I specifically said the TEACHINGS of JESUS against the TEACHINGS of Muhammad.... Now compare.adam1503 wrote:
http://www.evilbible.com/January.htmlowing wrote:
http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/koran.html
I can read, hear and see. Please explain how the moderates are following the teachings of a man who he himself lopped off over 600 heads?
See? I too can pick and choose evidence to support the idea that Christianity is a violent and intolerant religion. These quotes clearly show that Christianity is inherently hostile and intolerant towards others...
But wait, didnt we just agree that Christianity as it is observed by the majority is a peaceful and tolerant religion?
So you can see that by picking and choosing the evidence I can sway the argument against Christianity being peaceful, as you have done against Islam.
It is kinda hard to call the old tesament Christianity, since Christ was not even born
A) every one of those are taken out of contextadam1503 wrote:
http://www.evilbible.com/January.htmlowing wrote:
http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/koran.html
I can read, hear and see. Please explain how the moderates are following the teachings of a man who he himself lopped off over 600 heads?
See? I too can pick and choose evidence to support the idea that Christianity is a violent and intolerant religion. These quotes clearly show that Christianity is inherently hostile and intolerant towards others...
But wait, didnt we just agree that Christianity as it is observed by the majority is a peaceful and tolerant religion?
So you can see that by picking and choosing the evidence I can sway the argument against Christianity being peaceful, as you have done against Islam.
B) you need to understand much more about God in order to get the meaning of those
C) you also need to know something about Jewish history and their relationship with God
buts its just a movie.
Yes, taken out of context just like lowing's quotes from the Koran. It just goes to show that by twisting the evidence you can make it agree with your point of view, even when it dosent.clogar wrote:
A) every one of those are taken out of contextadam1503 wrote:
http://www.evilbible.com/January.htmlowing wrote:
http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/koran.html
I can read, hear and see. Please explain how the moderates are following the teachings of a man who he himself lopped off over 600 heads?
See? I too can pick and choose evidence to support the idea that Christianity is a violent and intolerant religion. These quotes clearly show that Christianity is inherently hostile and intolerant towards others...
But wait, didnt we just agree that Christianity as it is observed by the majority is a peaceful and tolerant religion?
So you can see that by picking and choosing the evidence I can sway the argument against Christianity being peaceful, as you have done against Islam.
B) you need to understand much more about God in order to get the meaning of those
C) you also need to know something about Jewish history and their relationship with God
except that mohamed really did kill people to spread islamadam1503 wrote:
Yes, taken out of context just like lowing's quotes from the Koran. It just goes to show that by twisting the evidence you can make it agree with your point of view, even when it dosent.clogar wrote:
A) every one of those are taken out of contextadam1503 wrote:
http://www.evilbible.com/January.htm
See? I too can pick and choose evidence to support the idea that Christianity is a violent and intolerant religion. These quotes clearly show that Christianity is inherently hostile and intolerant towards others...
But wait, didnt we just agree that Christianity as it is observed by the majority is a peaceful and tolerant religion?
So you can see that by picking and choosing the evidence I can sway the argument against Christianity being peaceful, as you have done against Islam.
B) you need to understand much more about God in order to get the meaning of those
C) you also need to know something about Jewish history and their relationship with God
No, he fought to defend Islam. The Koran teaches that war is only just or unjust; there is no such thing as a "holy" war. It teaches that war in self-defence or to fight tyranny and oppression is just.clogar wrote:
except that mohamed really did kill people to spread islam
what ? you have got to be kidding me, right ?clogar wrote:
muhammad spread islam himself by killing... it's funny how people say it's a religion of peace, and then they put down Christianity even though we spread our faith from 3000 to 3 million in 200 years, all this done non-violently.Spark wrote:
You're insane. Really.lowing wrote:
Ummmmm, these people ARE NOT following the teachings of Jesus......The radicals ARE following the teachings of Islam. It is the moderates who are not following Islam as it is taught by the prophet Muhammad.
You say that the moderates aren't following their own religion?
And you would know... how?
christian history is full of examples where we spread and "defended" and enforced our religion with the sword.
sort of like how stalin was just an atheist nutcase? he isn't representative of anything but himself and his followers. not the atheist community at large.lowing wrote:
Actually we don't: I believe Islamic terror is just that Islamic terror. I believe these Christian nutcases are just that Christian nutcases.
He's right there. And then (clogar) right again about how Muhammad was a blood thirsty savage who killed to get his own way.lowing wrote:
Ummmmm, these people ARE NOT following the teachings of Jesus......The radicals ARE following the teachings of Islam. It is the moderates who are not following Islam as it is taught by the prophet Muhammad.adam1503 wrote:
These christians follow a particular interpretation of the Bible, just as the radical Muslims follow a particular interpretation of the Quran.lowing wrote:
No these "Christians" go against the teaching of Jesus. The radical Muslims are following the teaching of Muhammad exactly
Although let's be honest. Christianity, when it started to become popular in Rome and then in Europe - ended up being nothing to do with Jesus anymore (unfortunately)
Christianity would be alot closer to Buddhism had the Europeans and Romans and Jews not fucked with the religion. Maybe that's East/West for you. Eastern Religions tend to follow the original codes whereas Middle Eastern/Western/European religions tend to be manipulated for personal gain.
Maybe that's why the West (and that includes Middle East/Islam) took over more or less the world, simply boils down to a case of a different mindset.
Last edited by Mek-Izzle (2008-01-25 04:04:02)
I have to say that unless history has been re-written and I've been reading bullshit (which is entirely possible but unlikely that it's ALL bullshit), Muhammad was a brutal killing cockstain. He was basically a tyrant whose particular path to control was religion. He was a thug who thought he could take control and expand his sphere of influence through violence and justify it with religion.
The same can probably be said about a bunch of "Christians" (the Spanish Inquisition, et al), but I don't use them as my example for quality living.
The same can probably be said about a bunch of "Christians" (the Spanish Inquisition, et al), but I don't use them as my example for quality living.
Last edited by Dersmikner (2008-01-25 06:38:37)
I see a fatwa in your future, infidel.Dersmikner wrote:
I have to say that unless history has been re-written and I've been reading bullshit (which is entirely possible but unlikely that it's ALL bullshit), Muhammad was a brutal killing cockstain. The was basically a tyrant whose particular path to control was religion. He was a thug who thought he could take control and expand his sphere of influence through violence and justify it with religion.
The same can probably be said about a bunch of "Christians" (the Spanish Inquisition, et al), but I don't use them as my example for quality living.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Can't the USAF 'accidently' lose a small tactical nuke above their house/church?
We don't have any of those...only the big "crowd pleasers".Bernadictus wrote:
Can't the USAF 'accidently' lose a small tactical nuke above their house/church?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
God hates Heath Ledger? Well, I'm sure that adds him to the countless billions in the WBC's book.
After thisFEOS wrote:
We don't have any of those...only the big "crowd pleasers".Bernadictus wrote:
Can't the USAF 'accidently' lose a small tactical nuke above their house/church?
I'm sure it won't be missed.
They should call themselves cult freaks, let the man RIP. That's the problem with religion is that it's open to interpretation by anyone. I like how they speak for their God saying that he hates him. I prayed for 4 years trying to getting something to respond to me, nothing ever did. The prophets didn't have to wait that long, so in my personal conclusion there is no God for surely he would have wanted a personal relationship with me.