RoosterCantrell
Goodbye :)
+399|6782|Somewhere else

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

lowing wrote:

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:


LOL...go ahead and do whatever makes you think you have been consistent and I have not.  I've said from the fist post that I would protect my home and family if directly attacked, but that I would not MURDER the person that was breaking into the neighbors home. 

Oh wait, did you just shoot me, because I forgot my keys and was trying to find a way into my house!?  PLEASE DON'T DO ME ANY FUCKING FAVORS YOU FUCKING CONSERVATIVE VIGILANTE!!!
Hmmmmmmm I wonder what you would do if someone broke into your nieghbors house while your son or daughter was spending the night there.
Nothing I am sure.

I already told ya, I won't see or hear a thing, I wouldn't care if ya fuckin froze to death stuck in your chimney or some other stupid shit. Probably would send the video to the Darwin Awards or one of the funniest video shows.
LOL!!!  You are so pathetic.  I feel sorry for your wife and family.  As much as I am a devout athiest I will say this, for your benefit...

May God have murcy on your soul.

Oh, and if there is a hell, and I'm going there, I have a place reserved just for you. 
constructive...
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7038|Salt Lake City

RoosterCantrell wrote:

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

lowing wrote:

Hmmmmmmm I wonder what you would do if someone broke into your nieghbors house while your son or daughter was spending the night there.
Nothing I am sure.

I already told ya, I won't see or hear a thing, I wouldn't care if ya fuckin froze to death stuck in your chimney or some other stupid shit. Probably would send the video to the Darwin Awards or one of the funniest video shows.
LOL!!!  You are so pathetic.  I feel sorry for your wife and family.  As much as I am a devout athiest I will say this, for your benefit...

May God have murcy on your soul.

Oh, and if there is a hell, and I'm going there, I have a place reserved just for you. 
constructive...
I'm editing this post because I have no intent of looking back over that many pages of posts to see what Rooster posted, and I think I may have overreacted to his post.  So, to Rooster, I apologize.

Last edited by Agent_Dung_Bomb (2008-01-01 21:17:56)

RoosterCantrell
Goodbye :)
+399|6782|Somewhere else

EDIT: nevermind. 

I was just gonna say chill out, much love all around.


I didn't post much, if anything.  But people don't have to post to have an interest in a thread.  It kinda sucks when it gets derailed a bit.

Last edited by RoosterCantrell (2008-01-01 21:23:19)

belldawg
Serial Jay-Walker
+52|6286|Perth, indian ocean

RoosterCantrell wrote:

EDIT: nevermind. 

I was just gonna say chill out, much love all around.
ahaha i was just reading what you really did say, good thing you read the apology note
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7038|Salt Lake City

RoosterCantrell wrote:

EDIT: nevermind. 

I was just gonna say chill out, much love all around.
It's cool.  I have a thick skin, as I would hope most on these forums do.  It's kind of a prerequisite to internet D&ST. 
RoosterCantrell
Goodbye :)
+399|6782|Somewhere else

belldawg wrote:

RoosterCantrell wrote:

EDIT: nevermind. 

I was just gonna say chill out, much love all around.
ahaha i was just reading what you really did say, good thing you read the apology note
ahh it wasnt bad.  i was just saying insult aren't constructive..

now IM the one derailing

-apologies-
Moo? Si!
Tall, Dark, Antlered
+39|6431|817---->907
Horn instead says he was in fear once he rounded a corner of his house and was confronted by both burglars.

...he was relying on when he says he came around the corner and came face to face with those people and they are on my property at that point."

Horn's account is that after he ordered the men not to move, they took off in different directions.

The bravado that seemed to fire up Horn before the shooting had left him when he returned into the house to tell the dispatcher in evident panic: "I had no choice ... They came in the front yard with me, man ... They came right in my yard."
1.  This tells me they were on his property when he told them not to move.
2.  They moved, possibly towards him, possibly away.  Given the adrenaline, the situation and location, I'm sure it was hard to discern which direction. 
3.  The dispatch seemed overly nonchalant.  I think if I was him and a guy just told me he was going after a couple of douche bags with a shotgun, I think I would be yelling at patrol to get their ass in gear and give an ETA.
4. Criminals are stupid, if they hit up a house and get away with it, they're going to the same house/houses in the area again. 
5.  Illegal aliens, theft.  Not off to a good start in the law abiding citizens category.
SharkyMcshark
I'll take two
+132|7087|Perth, Western Australia

lowing wrote:

This poor criminal shit never ceases to amaze me. You do realize it was the CRIMINALS that deserve to get hurt or killed during the commitment of a felony and NOT the victims RIGHT??
This argument brings to mind two immediate faults. The first is that Horn wasn't a victim at all. The second is what seems to a more over arching problem with you. The Fact That Its NOT Black And White. The only two options here AREN'T

a. Law abiding citizen so American they shit apple pie, or
b. Someone who committed a felony boom headshot.

Point is just because someone committed a crime it doesn't instantly make them eligible for death on the spot sans jury, judge, or trial.

And again, Horn said "I'm going to kill them". He went out there intending to kill them. Over a bag full of his neighbours possessions. What's right about that?


lowing wrote:

Now, are you going to stand by your belief that a home owner should NOT have the right to use deadly force in the defense of his hearth and home because the penal code has no provisions to kill burglars?
The penal code has provisions not to kill burglars because theft is not deemed to be a felony that warrants death. And again, obviously if a burglar is carrying a gun/running towards you with a knife/menacing you you'd be justified (to various levels) in shooting him.

If the criminal isn't using deadly force (or in this case is in fact not using force at all because they were running away), where's the justification for deadly force? They were on his land? They'd stolen? Neither trespassing or theft are capital offenses, and while Horn's back yard obviously wasn't a court, seeing as there is no case of self defense here you do have to look at what crime has been committed (in this case non capital crimes) when seeking an explanation for this heroic act violent shooting.

lowing wrote:

Nope, I am saying after being attacked, whether the criminal then runs or not, I can completely understand a victim being so full of emotion and adrenalin that he might shoot his attacker in the back, I also have no problem with it. Does that clarify it?
So what you're saying is that it's justifiable to commit a crime if you're a bit upset?

And again how does Horn qualify as the victim here? It wasn't his house, and he went looking for them (against the advice of emergency services none the less). He doesn't really sound like a victim at all to me.


Moo? Si! wrote:

1.  This tells me they were on his property when he told them not to move.
2.  They moved, possibly towards him, possibly away.  Given the adrenaline, the situation and location, I'm sure it was hard to discern which direction. 
3.  The dispatch seemed overly nonchalant.  I think if I was him and a guy just told me he was going after a couple of douche bags with a shotgun, I think I would be yelling at patrol to get their ass in gear and give an ETA.
4. Criminals are stupid, if they hit up a house and get away with it, they're going to the same house/houses in the area again. 
5.  Illegal aliens, theft.  Not off to a good start in the law abiding citizens category.
1. Not a capital offense

2. So what you're saying is that he didn't know what direction they were headed in but still managed land fatal shots on both of them? Because that doesn't really make sense to me (and yes, I have fired guns before).

3. Yes, because I'm sure screaming at Horn and screaming down the phone to the cops to 'hurry up before this redneck kills them' or something would have calmed him down.

4. Again, not a capital offense

5. And I hate to sound like a broken record player, but, not a capital offense

lowing wrote:

If you would not defend your home and your family up to and including death then you are either a liar, or a coward.
Of course a vast majority would defend their family to the death. But that's not what this is about. Defending family to the death doesn't comprise going to bring to justice execute two people who are dangerous and at large pose no threat to you because they wronged your neighbour by committing a non capital offense.

lowing wrote:

Again I do not support murder but if a criminal gets killed while commiting their crimes oh well.
I don't know about what planet you're from, but on Earth the only two colours aren't black and white.

I'm still astounded that people on here think that a non violent burglary justifies being shot executed by a perfectly sane rational citizen vigilante redneck while feeling the scene.

Hero my ass. He should at least face two charges of manslaughter. Probably first degree murder, but then and again this is Texas we're talking about.

Last edited by SharkyMcshark (2008-01-01 23:22:11)

mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7023|Sydney, Australia
I'm going to close this thread at this point. After 8 pages we are beginning to go around in circles. Thanks Sharky for the excellent post above.


Lowing, I'm not denying that people should have the ability to defend themselves, using deadly force, when their own life is in danger. The force should however match the threat. It must be just and reasonable, and in response to a clear and present danger.

This being said, the OP's case involves a man who had no association with the crime in progress premeditate on, and carry out the execution of two robbers. Now on the claim that he could have been protecting his neighbours (which I don't believe where home. I'll check the article) - the robbers were running away. They presented no threat to Mr. Horn or his neighbours.


"He's comin out the window... I've gotta go now... You hear the shotgun clickin' and I'm going."

The decision to kill them was made while he was not in danger. As such, he should be charged and prosecuted to the full extent of the law.


In a civilised society, there should be no tolerance for this vigilante form of justice. The punishment should fit the crime, and as the 911 operator stated:

"Property is not worth killing someone over"

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard