here is Spark, in true form, as polite and mature a debater as ever:
Well, spark, HERE'S YOUR LINK
spark wrote:Put up or shut up. Give a decent scientific argument or shove your religious supremacy up your ass.
the problem with the global warming debate is, it is not actually a debate. It's a fight, with the believers in global warming actively trying to squash the argument, rather than feel the argument out. For these people, global warming is so obvious that we don't have time to argue about it, let's tax tax tax and levy fines, and then (and this is the convenient part) when we don't die from rising waters in 10 years, they take the credit.
there is tons and tons of research out there, but Spark, this one's for you.
you too, cameron.
and linkAn analysis by Bloomberg News on December 6 found: "Government officials and activists flying to Bali, Indonesia, for the United Nations meeting on climate change will cause as much pollution as 20,000 cars in a year." (emphasis added) link
...and still more link
and lastly, even if there was global warming, it has officially stopped.
If you respond, Spark, please do not flame me personally. I do my research. I am not a sucker for the deliberate misconceptions in Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth."
There are always 2 sides to an argument. What are you afraid of, by refusing to learn the other side of the argument? Why are the global warming crowds so belligerent?
Last edited by G3|Genius (2007-12-11 18:12:46)