BF2S Forums Ann Coulter, do I know First hand what she is about. ?

[blaq] plague wrote:

Nomer wrote:

Kniero wrote:

How sorrowful that statement truly is - the only fool here is the one keeping themself in seclusion.

Can you read? He's an Aussie!  He has no reason to know some relatively unimportant american political pundit/figure, after all, he doesn't get Fox News or MSNBC or any of that crap that she or any other of those jokes appear on.  Just try to name a mainstream Aussie politician, now try to name a trivial yet visible Aussie talking head.

The simple fact is that if he doesn't listen to any of it...why is he posting in here?

Horseman 77 wrote:

Yes here is the only Direct qoute in the Entire Article.

A refrence to clinton

" who won the presidency only because Ross Perot took 19 percent of the vote. "





a Fragment of a sentence, that she spoke.

And The fragment Is 100% true.

again my piont is The right is Independent by nature, The left will support a child molester or a rapist if it suits their needs.

"I love to engage in repartee with people who are stupider than I am."  That was a direct quote...shows how arrogant she is.  I don't disagree with you.  It just ridiculous how people as polarized as she is don't really do anything constructive for politics, either conservative or liberal.  Just drivelling on about how ignorant the other side is.  I'm pretty moderate, so I like to drivel on about how ignorant they both are.

I watched the Video and she didnt say that.

Horseman 77 wrote:

Horseman 77 wrote:

[blaq] plague wrote:

The simple fact is that if he doesn't listen to any of it...why is he posting in here?


"I love to engage in repartee with people who are stupider than I am."  That was a direct quote...shows how arrogant she is.  I don't disagree with you.  It just ridiculous how people as polarized as she is don't really do anything constructive for politics, either conservative or liberal.  Just drivelling on about how ignorant the other side is.  I'm pretty moderate, so I like to drivel on about how ignorant they both are.

I watched the Video and she didnt say that.

She was commenting on people who were shouting chanting and trying to disrupt "Free Speach "

No hate, no arogance ,  so The problem is what ?

But weren't they practicing free speech just as much as disrupting it?  Also, that was a quote from the article referenced, I haven't found a video with her speech/QnA session on it.  I will agree though, that given the circumstances of the speech, maybe it's not the best example.  How about when she told a disabled Vietnam vet that people like him "were the reason we lost the war."  Or how "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."

...On the other hand, here's one that made me laugh...

"A couple [of] alleged males attempted to sucker punch a 100-pound woman and missed. And they ended up with their faces smashed in and spending the night in the Pima County Jail, where I'm sure -- being good liberals -- their views on gay marriage will serve them well."

I've read enough by her to still think she's a fascist buffoon...But a least she has a good wit.

Last edited by [blaq] plague (2005-12-30 16:30:44)

Horseman 77 wrote:

Marconius wrote:

Ann Coulter is a lying liar and I hate all of the lies when she tells them!

pants on fire ?  Age please, lol

the only direct qoute was the refrence to clinton

" who won the presidency only because Ross Perot took 19 percent of the vote. "  Where is the lie ?

I was making a pretty obvious reference to Al Franken's book "Lies and the Lying Liars that Tell Them."  Not obvious enough, I guess.  Ann Coulter happens to be one of the primary targets in that book, and everything Franken comes up with against her checks out.

[blaq] plague wrote:

Horseman 77 wrote:

Yes here is the only Direct qoute in the Entire Article.

A refrence to clinton

" who won the presidency only because Ross Perot took 19 percent of the vote. "



a Fragment of a sentence, that she spoke.

And The fragment Is 100% true.

again my piont is The right is Independent by nature, The left will support a child molester or a rapist if it suits their needs.

Also, there's actually not any solid proof that Perot cost Bush Sr. the election in 92.  Most of the studies showed that he only took a marginal amount of votes away from the republicans...The majority of his voters had already voted either democrat/independent in both senate and state ballots.  In the electoral college, perot took 32 votes from Clinton, and 37 from Bush...Since bush lost by 100...I don't think the 5 extra would have been enough.

Bush was conservative Perot was Ultra Conservative cliton was Libral Democrat.  Be realistic.

Every lucid person in The United States knows that Perot took Votes from Bush and not clinton.