Last edited by Ganko_06 (2007-07-12 20:21:33)
He only got my vote once but just the same I'm still pissed at myself for allowing a moron the top seat.ATG wrote:
.
I voted for the man. Twice.
What I was wondering.Mitch wrote:
what makes you make a post about it atg?
did you have a choice? /noVillain{NY} wrote:
He only got my vote once but just the same I'm still pissed at myself for allowing a moron the top seat.ATG wrote:
.
I voted for the man. Twice.
Last edited by CoronadoSEAL (2007-07-12 20:25:10)
Yes. I could've voted for Gore.CoronadoSEAL wrote:
did you have a choice? /noVillain{NY} wrote:
He only got my vote once but just the same I'm still pissed at myself for allowing a moron the top seat.ATG wrote:
.
I voted for the man. Twice.
I would have thought that everything the man said in his 1st Term would be enough warning about his 2nd Term. Im still wondering why Mr Bush gotVillain{NY} wrote:
He only got my vote once but just the same I'm still pissed at myself for allowing a moron the top seat.
and he hasn't proven to be a moron either... /sarcasmVillain{NY} wrote:
Yes. I could've voted for Gore.CoronadoSEAL wrote:
did you have a choice? /noVillain{NY} wrote:
He only got my vote once but just the same I'm still pissed at myself for allowing a moron the top seat.
I am consumed with the hatred.The_Mac wrote:
What I was wondering.Mitch wrote:
what makes you make a post about it atg?
That's no excuse.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
commander in chief
Where i live, the polution gets so bad some days, the sky is brown from the hazeATG wrote:
Ya know, I don't believe a thing the man says.
He could say the sky was blue, and I would go outside and check.
Last edited by weerdfoo1 (2007-07-12 21:43:34)
lmao, someone has to much time on there hands...weerdfoo1 wrote:
Where i live, the polution gets so bad some days, the sky is brown from the hazeATG wrote:
Ya know, I don't believe a thing the man says.
He could say the sky was blue, and I would go outside and check.
He lied!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*edit* by the way, i found this a couple years back ago http://www.bushisantichrist.com
CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:
when there is a war going on, it would be bad to switch presidents especially since the opposing candidates were of the appeasement/containment crowd. Everyone (not me) seems to love Clinton but i say that guy just passed the buck and we're paying for it now. while america slept during the 1990s in semi-isolationism, our friends the Islamo-fascists were gaining strength and plotting. Clinton's failure to nip it in the bud when he had Al Qaeda's chief in the crosshairs just illustrates that party's lack of understanding of the nature of the threat.
i am glad GW is a proponent of taking it to the terrorists. i'd rather do that than sit back and wait for another attack. but this way you won't win friends unfortunately. people see this as being a bully and not fixing the problem (eg, eliminating fascist islam). this is again why everyone loved clinton. he was soft on terrorism and 'played-nicey-nice' with everyone when at the time we probably shouldn't have done that.
Also, i think there is a great amount of problems with Bush's appointees. i think some of them are lackeys and are useless. Rummy wanted to go too light into Iraq and they totally dropped the ball when they disbanded the army and didn't contain all the vast storehouses of weapons. I don't think Bush necessarily was the guy saying not to do this.
Bush is also seemingly a very loyal person to his people. this is to a fault because when his people screw up and screw up badly, he's too loyal to call them out on their mess-up and fix the situation. that's one major fault i think that he needs to fix and fix quickly.