pj666
Member
+16|6376|Sydney, Australia
1. Sufficiently quiet sub runs silent service and waits for the carrier group to pass over it. Pops half a dozen torpedoes at the carrier and skidaddles (to be hunted down and killed by the rest of the pissed off group).
2. Submarine wolf pack. Co-ordinated with 3 and 4 below.
3. Swarm the group with so many land based missiles the Aegis gets overwhelmed. Even they can't stop everything if you throw enough at it.

China doesn't have any carriers, but is busting to build some. India has some, but they aren't up to the US. No other country has a blue water navy able to go head to head with a US carrier group, apart from maybe the Russians, and they have let their navy run down. So ...

4. Land based squadrons of fighters and bombers launching swarms of missiles.

But the real clincher:

5. EMP pulse to knock out the computers. Military hard ware is pretty protected, but it would at least distract them if not knock them out temporarily. Stick an EMP bomb in a sea mine or similar, and leave it floating in front of where the group is going. Watch it by satellite until it gets close, then let off the pulse. Then cue 2, 3 and 4 above.

But I prefer the Under Siege scenario. Just so we all get to see Erika Eleniak's breasts again.
Pernicious544
Zee Tank Skank
+80|6711|MoVal So-Cal

Bubbalo wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:


Yet again, usmarine demonstrate his brilliant intellect.  There is absolutely no force capable of defeating a carrier group other than god.  Even two carrier groups couldn't do it!
Show me an example of someone destroying a modern carrier group?
Show me an example of two carrier groups attempting to.

Seriously, you say things like that, then attempt to seriously defend them, and then you wonder why some people consider you a nutjob?
You should think about the word "nutjob" and how it relates to you for a second.
Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6489|Communist Republic of CA, USA

r2zoo wrote:

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

r2zoo wrote:

Anyone seen "The Sum of All Fears"?  They pretty much kicked the hell out of a carrier with a couple of well placed missle shots.  True it was sort of a sneak attack, and was jsut the carrier, but it is possible.
IIRC, in both the book and movie, There is 0 response from the Carrier's Escorts and Air Wing.  Hell even in the movie, in one of the panoramic shots, the Carrier is alone AND empty (no crewmen, planes, nothing).
Movie sucked IMO, book was much better, but as for it being empty, never really understood that.  But it does show how the Anit air/anti missle system can be over whelemed and that a carrier is vulnerable.  To be honest a bunch of guys running around on deck launching planes isnt much defense agaisnt already airborne aircraft currently attacking.  On the flipside carriers are almost always launching various aircraft 24/7 to deter such a thing and for training etc.

Defeating a carrier group would be nearly impossible directly without massive resources and lives.  However striking the homeports of the ships and armorys along with supply lines would effectivly cripple the ships.  Without gasoline for the aircraft, what good is your squadrons.  Sure a carrier can run for decades on a nuclear reactor, it will run out of drinking water, food, medical supplies, replacement parts and ammunation.  No supplies, no fight.

Shame we dont have Battleships in the Navy anymore, sure their obsolete but ill be damned if seeing that beast off your coastline wouldnt make you reconsider attacking
The System was overwhelmed because the escorts didn't open fire, and only one (of two on each side) CIWS systems opened fire, at a range much closer than their maximum range.  And according to the movie (I'm looking for my book, you've got me interested again), the planes get through by sneaking under the Carrier's Radar.  This may be possible if it's just the carrier, but good luck sneaking past the AEGIS', AWACS, and Air Screen, which can all scan to the water level.  Also note that in both the book and movie, the Ship is heavily damaged, not sunk.  The thing about the Nimitz is that, although you can take away all of its weapons and such, the ship is still built so well that you would have to flood almost every compartment to sink it.

Edit: In regards to being empty, I think it was just a film crew error.  I'm pretty sure the shots beforehand shows the pilots scrambling and such.

Last edited by Major.League.Infidel (2007-06-16 01:11:07)

Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6489|Communist Republic of CA, USA

Longbow wrote:

USSR sub [ Nuclear torpedo ] US Carrier Strike Group
Original Post says conventional Weapons.
Vernedead
Cossack
+21|6244|Albion
mines
Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6489|Communist Republic of CA, USA

pj666 wrote:

1. Sufficiently quiet sub runs silent service and waits for the carrier group to pass over it. Pops half a dozen torpedoes at the carrier and skidaddles (to be hunted down and killed by the rest of the pissed off group).
2. Submarine wolf pack. Co-ordinated with 3 and 4 below.
3. Swarm the group with so many land based missiles the Aegis gets overwhelmed. Even they can't stop everything if you throw enough at it.

China doesn't have any carriers, but is busting to build some. India has some, but they aren't up to the US. No other country has a blue water navy able to go head to head with a US carrier group, apart from maybe the Russians, and they have let their navy run down. So ...

4. Land based squadrons of fighters and bombers launching swarms of missiles.

But the real clincher:

5. EMP pulse to knock out the computers. Military hard ware is pretty protected, but it would at least distract them if not knock them out temporarily. Stick an EMP bomb in a sea mine or similar, and leave it floating in front of where the group is going. Watch it by satellite until it gets close, then let off the pulse. Then cue 2, 3 and 4 above.
1. The escorts are pinging away with Active Sonar the whole time, and the 2 688's are there for that reason
2. See above
3.  We're talking like 1,000+ missiles.   Think we'd notice a cluster of that many launchers, considering Joe Chinamen can't just pick up a Styx launcher and fire from the hip.
4.  Planes are even easier to hit than Missiles.
5.  I'm not sure if EMP is considered conventional, and I'm also unsure if any nation has weaponized it yet.  And Good Luck mining the Open Ocean unnoticed and getting the CVBG to stumble onto them, especially with the escorts pinging away and the S-3's flying ahead.  And since doing that would force the mines to be unsecured, there's no telling where they'd end up.  Also take into account Water's effects on an EMP pulse (I'm not sure of this, just thinking out loud).

Again, I can't stress this enough.  The Nimitz is built with so many compartments and is so watertight that you'd need to flood over 75% of the compartments to sink it.  That's just the way they are built.  So yes, you could take out its Teeth, but it would still be floating.(Uncomfirmed percentage, but I know it's more than 50%)
CannonFodder11b
Purple Heart Recipient
+73|6700|Fort Lewis WA

DeadboyUSMC wrote:

Rule out any kind of submarines attacking the carrier group. Yay destroyers and sonar.

Oh, and missiles, CWIS'll take them out.
Beg to differ... Active sonar or a Ping, will detect a sub. An active ping can be heard by anyone listening.  And its a double edged sword. Most ships do not troll around 24/7 Pinging. Now if a sub is silent and submerged IE just laying in the water not moving under its own power, cavitation will not occur and no sounds will be made from the sub (Cavitation is air bubbles that form when a subs screw(s) are churning.  If the sub is sitting silent and most modern subs due to the rubber like coating over the hulls are noise dampened, so no man made noises will escape the sub unless it is pressurizing its tubes, or opening torp doors.

A sub can sit for hours without making noise, if the tubes are flooded there goes that noise, all it would take is a loud and noisy carrier group to give the sub an idea of range and target range, from there all it would take is 1 active ping to set up a firing solution. Once the solution is made the sub can pop off 4 torps (most attack class subs have 4 foreward torpedo bays) 4 shots in the water, torps aren't what they used to be they seek noise and follow for the most part.  4 hits will cripple a carrier, if not cause it to take on mass amounts of water.   

What i'm saying is Nothing is invincible...where theres a will theres a way.
The russians if given the proper motivation can sneak a sub into a carrier group.
Hell the french could probably sneak a sub into a carrier group if given the proper motivation of Bree, and wine.
ELITE-UK
Scratching my back
+170|6485|SHEFFIELD, ENGLAND
I'd say the 3 new Royal navy's super subs would do the job.
7ig4
Member
+0|6171|Germany
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_212_submarine with Barracuda Supercavitation Torpedoes...

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20061113-121539-3317r.htm
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6572

iamangry wrote:

I don't think the OP meant to include the United States' own weapon systems, because if they did, its a simple matter of sending the B-2's out for a bombing run, then following through with some F-22's and finally just coming in with another carrier group.  But of course I don't know why I'm even saying this, because you're going to come back with some excuse like "it doesn't say only non-american technology in the op" or something like that, and I'll make some reply to the effect of what I just said, only being more deliberate in explaining my logic, and then you'll say something completely off the wall, and then we'll all be sick of arguing semantics with you instead of actually debating, and concede.  So let me make you happy and concede outright.  usmarine's a nutjob, I have no idea what I'm talking about (makes me LOL when it comes to defense tech), you're always right.
Yes, because I certainly wasn't saying that just to point out the obvious fallacy of usmarine's statement.

And a couple of B2s wouldn't make it past a carrier group's air defences.

Pernicious544 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:


Show me an example of someone destroying a modern carrier group?
Show me an example of two carrier groups attempting to.

Seriously, you say things like that, then attempt to seriously defend them, and then you wonder why some people consider you a nutjob?
You should think about the word "nutjob" and how it relates to you for a second.
Yes, because I'm absolutely crazy for suggesting that anything but a deity could destroy a carrier group.

If they're so good, why is the US still doing weapons research?

Last edited by Bubbalo (2007-06-16 02:56:09)

Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6632|London, England
You know what, even if it is taken out. The U.S has like 10+ more of those supercarriers. That's just fucking hacking.


Even big countries have only one or two. Shit, China doesn't even have one yet. Then, these carriers are no way as big as the U.S ones. The USN is just miles better than anyone else. Still, i'm sure some sneaky tactics or a shitload of missiles will do the job.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ai … in_service
Retalliation[1337]
Robin Hood ---> "u got arrownd"
+51|6485|Belgium
/lol i thought u meant starcraft.....
Well since submarines have worked very well in the past why not use them now?
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6572

Mekstizzle wrote:

Even big countries have only one or two. Shit, China doesn't even have one yet. Then, these carriers are no way as big as the U.S ones. The USN is just miles better than anyone else. Still, i'm sure some sneaky tactics or a shitload of missiles will do the job.
A shitload of anything will do the job.  The question is how big a shitload (and does any have the capacity to create it).
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6592|SE London

Akula class subs, attacking while a diversionary air strike and missile barrage hit, would have a shot.

Or ships equipped with that rail gun that was being tested.
CannonFodder11b
Purple Heart Recipient
+73|6700|Fort Lewis WA

Bubbalo wrote:

If they're so good, why is the US still doing weapons research?
Because if you dont do constant research you're not going to last very long.
For every 1 person trying to make things better, and safer, there are 10 people trying to figure out ways to blow shit up, and kill people.
Its the nature of the beast.
-101-InvaderZim
Member
+42|6854|Waikato, Aotearoa

Ghosty wrote:

one missile sunk a british ship in the falkland conflict so the answer is yes, conventional weapons can sink a ship no matter how big (also look at the titanic one ice cube sunk that and thats a fucking HUGE ship) everyone likes to think their country is unbeatable but no matter how big and strong little things will always pin big things down.
Or the unexpected

Dont forget Murphy's Law of Combat:
58. When in doubt, empty your magazine
131. Any ship can be a minesweeper . . . . once
153. No battleplan no matter how well thought out ever survives initial contact

Speaking of Murphys Law of Combat - its amazing how many of them are SO TRUE. I just had a look thru some of them
and agreed with almost all of them.

Last edited by -101-InvaderZim (2007-06-16 05:37:55)

Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6686|Canberra, AUS

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

pj666 wrote:

1. Sufficiently quiet sub runs silent service and waits for the carrier group to pass over it. Pops half a dozen torpedoes at the carrier and skidaddles (to be hunted down and killed by the rest of the pissed off group).
2. Submarine wolf pack. Co-ordinated with 3 and 4 below.
3. Swarm the group with so many land based missiles the Aegis gets overwhelmed. Even they can't stop everything if you throw enough at it.

China doesn't have any carriers, but is busting to build some. India has some, but they aren't up to the US. No other country has a blue water navy able to go head to head with a US carrier group, apart from maybe the Russians, and they have let their navy run down. So ...

4. Land based squadrons of fighters and bombers launching swarms of missiles.

But the real clincher:

5. EMP pulse to knock out the computers. Military hard ware is pretty protected, but it would at least distract them if not knock them out temporarily. Stick an EMP bomb in a sea mine or similar, and leave it floating in front of where the group is going. Watch it by satellite until it gets close, then let off the pulse. Then cue 2, 3 and 4 above.
1. The escorts are pinging away with Active Sonar the whole time, and the 2 688's are there for that reason
2. See above
3.  We're talking like 1,000+ missiles.   Think we'd notice a cluster of that many launchers, considering Joe Chinamen can't just pick up a Styx launcher and fire from the hip.
4.  Planes are even easier to hit than Missiles.
5.  I'm not sure if EMP is considered conventional, and I'm also unsure if any nation has weaponized it yet.  And Good Luck mining the Open Ocean unnoticed and getting the CVBG to stumble onto them, especially with the escorts pinging away and the S-3's flying ahead.  And since doing that would force the mines to be unsecured, there's no telling where they'd end up.  Also take into account Water's effects on an EMP pulse (I'm not sure of this, just thinking out loud).

Again, I can't stress this enough.  The Nimitz is built with so many compartments and is so watertight that you'd need to flood over 75% of the compartments to sink it.  That's just the way they are built.  So yes, you could take out its Teeth, but it would still be floating.(Uncomfirmed percentage, but I know it's more than 50%)
You might not sink it - but if there was plenty of aviation fuel around and a few AS-6's or something hit the right spot...

Land-based aircraft can hit a ship way beyond it's Aegis system's range. You need the fighters to deal with that.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Noobeater
Northern numpty
+194|6458|Boulder, CO
lots of poison and a crooked chef could probably do it.
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|6641|Washington, DC

I think it's safe to say that if a nation ever sunk a US carrier group, that nation would be lucky to not be a radioactive wasteland the next day
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|6768|Argentina
This will do it.

https://img510.imageshack.us/img510/8401/georgewbushyp8.jpg
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6572

CannonFodder11b wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

If they're so good, why is the US still doing weapons research?
Because if you dont do constant research you're not going to last very long.
For every 1 person trying to make things better, and safer, there are 10 people trying to figure out ways to blow shit up, and kill people.
Its the nature of the beast.
Keep in mind that was in response to someone arguing that only God can destroy it.  Surely once you get to that point R&D is a waste of money?
BVC
Member
+325|6706
How would people in the US react if a carrier was sunk?
coke
Aye up duck!
+440|6720|England. Stoke
A missile attack would have even less chance of success after the recent refits of certain vessels which has seen the Phalanx system replaced with these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIM-116_Ro … me_Missile
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6772

Bubbalo wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:


Yet again, usmarine demonstrate his brilliant intellect.  There is absolutely no force capable of defeating a carrier group other than god.  Even two carrier groups couldn't do it!
Show me an example of someone destroying a modern carrier group?
Show me an example of two carrier groups attempting to.

Seriously, you say things like that, then attempt to seriously defend them, and then you wonder why some people consider you a nutjob?
Blah blah blah....... USA BAD evil sucks blah blah blah.
samfink
Member
+31|6566
how to destroy a carrier group? easy. 7 bombers is enough. how? get on the good side of the USA, so an overflight isn't seen as a big thing, then bomb the bridge of the shops, then get the hell out of there. either that or hijack 7 Airbus A380s and kamikaze them into the ships. you would only have the subs left, and they would likely be reassigned to a different carrier group or mothballed. juts remember to get yuor nuke defences in place first, or you will be nuked to death, then a few thousand more just to make sure. to aid in the mission, try to jam the missile defenses.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard