Arcano-D.E.S wrote:
I think without Hitler the situation in Germany, specifically Weimar, would have collapsed into a civil war. It would probably have severely split the country and even led to places like Bavaria breaking away. It would be a long a bloody civil war but the communists would lose because they didn't have the army and a fascist government would come to power. It is also very likely that the German fascists would have recieved help from England and Italy to win. I say this because the fear of communism was much greater than the fear of Fascism. Fascism really didn't put the fear into people until Hitler.
i don't think the germans would have fought against themselves in a civil war, first, they had no weapons, second, they came out of war, it took hitler three years to build his army, and the moral for war, he, and his folks, needed. the germans waited for someone that showed the way to unity.
no one is interested in politics, if they know there is SOMEONE (one single person, the individual believes in) is in charge, and leads his country. this simple fact worked fine, and still does.
{USMC}Louis wrote:
The Holocost would never have happened and alot more Jews would still be alive or atleast their families..
watch the jewish diaspora, true 6 ooo ooo jews were killed and many thousand families were extinguished by hitlers genocide, but he wasn't the only one, as far, as i remember, the population of israel was even forced to leave their country, some thousand years ago. i think the diaspora started 600 BCE.
{USMC}Louis wrote:
Poland would probably be alot better off
i don't think so....
poland was the years before WWII a very ununified country, the parties were in controversy positions to the country itself, how to handle it after the monarchy and the treatment of versailles. besides they started a war against czechoslovakia. war was a common, political, solution to many problems, that days.